![\"<p>RPT](\"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
The ED told the court that the interim protection was granted on March 24, 2018 on the condition that Karti will appear before the investigating officer as and when directed and join the probe, but he has been avoiding summons to appear before it after the filing of the charge sheet.
Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and senior advocate Sonia Mathur, appearing for the agency, alleged that Karti was not cooperating with the investigation<\/a>, which was one of the conditions imposed on him.
The agency told the court that the probe regarding FDI approval was continuing.
\"The accused willfully and deliberately avoided the summons issued to him since June 2016\", with the \"sole aim\" of derailing the proceedings, the agency claimed.
\"Whenever he was confronted with the documents, he showed his irritation, sometimes anger and then conveniently avoided to answer the question on one pretext or the other,\" it alleged.
\"Though the accused did appear at times when called for investigation<\/a> but used to leave mid-way while intimating that he would not be able appear for about a week. The said modus was essentially to consult lawyers and tailor-made answered to questions asked on earlier date of examination, thus not revealing complete facts and also delaying the investigation.
\"It is pertinent to mention that such tailor-made answers provided as a result of the legal assistance has mandated the need for a custodial interrogation<\/a> of the accused for an affective investigation which would not be possible sans the custody of the accused,\" the agency said in its plea, moved through advocates N K Matta and Nitesh Rana.
During a brief hearing, the court asked advocate Arshdeep Singh, appearing for Karti, why his client was not joining the probe.
The counsel said Karti had joined the probe on various occasions before the charge sheet was filed by the agency against him. \"I (Karti) am not running away. I sought a copy of the charge sheet but they are not responding,\" the counsel said, while seeking time to file a detailed reply to the plea.
In its plea, the ED said that even during investigation, Karti had either remained silent or answered after consulting his lawyers.
Maintaining that the apex court had directed it to complete the investigation within six months, that is by September 12, the ED alleged that the actions of the accused were \"nothing but dilatory tactics\" to bypass the attempt to complete probe within the time frame.
On August 7, the court had extended till October 8 the interim protection from arrest granted to Chidambaram and Karti in the Aircel-Maxis<\/a> cases filed by the CBI and the ED for the alleged offences of corruption and money laundering respectively. They were named in the charge sheet filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the case on July 19.
The ED is also probing a separate money-laundering case in the Aircel-Maxis matter and a charge sheet was filed against Karti by the agency on July 13.
Chidambaram and Karti have been questioned by the ED on various occasions, even though the politician has not been arrayed as an accused. Both have denied the allegations levelled against them by the CBI and the ED.<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":65762591,"title":"Rising diesel prices may hurt Airtel, Vodafone-Idea and Reliance Jio","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/rising-diesel-prices-may-hurt-telcom-sector\/65762591","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":65762651,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Aircel-Maxis case:ED presses for custodial interrogation of Karti Chidambaram","synopsis":"Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and senior advocate Sonia Mathur, appearing for the agency, alleged that Karti was not cooperating with the investigation, which was one of the conditions imposed on him.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/aircel-maxis-caseed-presses-for-custodial-interrogation-of-karti-chidambaram","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"PTI","artdate":"2018-09-11 08:21:01","lastupd":"2018-09-11 08:21:01","breadcrumbTags":["Aircel-Maxis","Interrogation","Investigation","Industry","chidambaram"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/aircel-maxis-caseed-presses-for-custodial-interrogation-of-karti-chidambaram"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2018-09-11" data-index="article_1">
- Telecom乐动扑克News
- 3分钟阅读
Aircel-Maxis案例:ED按上述表示奇丹巴拉姆的保管的审讯
额外的副检察长梅塔和高级主索尼娅Mathur,印度央行机构的出现,声称表示不配合调查,这是对他的条件之一。
艾德告诉法庭,临时保护被授予3月24日,2018年,条件是表示将会出现在调查官当导演和加入调查,但是他一直避免召唤出现之前,提交后的费用单。
额外的副检察长梅塔和高级主索尼娅Mathur,印度央行机构的出现,声称表示并不配合调查,这是对他的条件之一。
该机构告诉法庭,调查关于FDI批准仍在继续。
“被告故意,故意避开了召唤发给他2016年6月以来”,“唯一目标”的破坏程序,该机构声称。
“每当他面对这些文件,显示他的刺激,有时愤怒,然后方便地避免回答这个问题在一个借口,“所谓。
“虽然被告确实出现在呼吁的时候调查但用于离开中路,暗示他不可能出现在大约一个星期。该方法本质上是咨询律师和特制的回答问题早些时候的考试日期,因此也不显示完整的事实和拖延调查。
“相关提这种特制的答案提供的法律援助规定需要保管的审讯被告的情感调查不可能无监护权的被告,”该机构表示认罪,穿过倡导者N K马塔和Nitesh Rana。
在一个简短的听证会,法院要求主Arshdeep辛格,出现上述表示,为什么没有加入他的客户调查。
律师表示,表示已经加入了探测器在各种场合和案件记录提交之前的机构反对他。“我(表示)不逃跑。我寻找一份表但他们不回应,”律师说,而寻求文件详细回复请求的时间。
在其认罪,艾德说,即使在调查,表示后保持沉默或回答咨询他的律师。
维护顶点法院指示它在六个月内完成调查,是9月12日,ED声称被告的行为是“除了不慌不忙的战术”绕过试图探测的时间框架内完成。
8月7日,法院已经扩展到10月8日的临时保护逮捕授予奇丹巴拉姆和表示Aircel-Maxis案件由CBI和ED分别涉嫌犯罪腐败和洗钱。提起的案件记录他们的名字由中央调查局(CBI) 7月19日。
ED也探索一个单独的洗钱案Aircel-Maxis物质和费用表的起诉表示由该机构在7月13日。
奇丹巴拉姆和表示质疑的ED在各种场合,即使作为指控政治家没有排列。都否认对他们的指控CBI和ED。
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动