\n\n\tThe chamber has also opposed any restriction in the form of a telecom service provider (TSP)-agnostic platform for providing free data to consumers, arguing that such a proposal would add an unnecessary, additional layer between content providers, telcos and consumers, which could result in additional costs and reduced efficiencies, with no clear ownership for consumer grievances. \n
\"The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai<\/a>) may find it a challenge in regulating such a platform under the provisions of the Trai Act,” Assocham warned in a statement Monday.
\n\n\t“Allowing technical and commercial flexibility with a level-playing field for all businesses in the internet value chain, including telecom operators will also promote the goals of broadband connectivity, attract investment and innovation, thus allowing consumer choice for internet access,” the chamber added.\n
Accordingly, the chamber feels India's telecom policy<\/a> framework should encourage a variety of business models under its forbearance regime with regulatory oversight, rather than mandating or prohibiting certain practices.
\n\n\tDelegation of pricing flexibility from licensed TSPs to third-party platform owners, it said, would result in additional costs and be counter-productive to the objective of affordable internet for all, the Assocham spokesman said.\n
\n\n\tThe chamber also cautioned that allowing unregulated third parties to provide free data would be detrimental to TSPs, which have heavily invested in infrastructure.\n
\n\n\tThe chamber noted that European Union (EU) regulations and the US’s Open Internet Rules allowed differential pricing subject to certain boundaries, maintaining the Net Neutrality principle.\n
\n\n\tAs a result, “they recognise it is imperative to provide technical and commercial flexibility to TSPs,” Assocham said.\n
\n\n\tAccordingly, Trai should take a holistic view on issues relating to OTT services, net neutrality, same service same rules and differential pricing and take a de-novo approach to the issue of provisioning free data, the chamber added.\n
\n<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":53262534,"title":"Bharti Airtel adds 1.40 million subscribers in June","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/bharti-airtel-adds-1-40-million-subscribers-in-june\/53262534","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":53262749,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Assocham urges Trai to review differential pricing rule","synopsis":"Assocham has opposed any restriction by way of a telecom service provider (TSP)-agnostic platform and urged the telecom regulator to restore pricing flexibility to licensed TSPs and review its differential pricing regulation","titleseo":"telecomnews\/assocham-urges-trai-to-review-differential-pricing-rule","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2016-07-18 13:15:43","lastupd":"2016-07-18 17:05:57","breadcrumbTags":["TRAI","policy","Assocham","Differential pricing"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/assocham-urges-trai-to-review-differential-pricing-rule"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2016-07-18" data-index="article_1">
Assocham敦促火车审查差别定价规则
Assocham反对任何限制的电信服务提供商(TSP)不可知论的平台,并敦促电信监管机构恢复许可茶匙定价灵活性和审查其差别定价的监管
加尔各答:行业组织Assocham敦促电信监管机构审查其除非订单吗差别定价的数据服务除了为领有执照的经营者和恢复编列的灵活性。
室也反对任何形式的限制电信服务提供者(TSP)不可知论者的平台向消费者提供免费的数据,认为这样一个计划将添加一个不必要的,附加层之间的内容提供商、电信公司和消费者,这可能会导致额外的成本和效率降低,没有明确的所有权为消费者的不满。
“印度电信管理局(火车)可能会发现它在控制这样一个平台一个挑战火车法案的规定下,印度联合工商会”周一在一份声明中警告说。
“让技术和商业灵活性与对所有企业公平的竞争在互联网价值链,包括电信运营商也将促进宽带连接的目标,吸引投资和创新,从而使消费者选择上网,”美国商会补充道。
因此,印度电信室感觉政策框架应该鼓励多种商业模式下的忍耐与监管制度,而不是授权或禁止某些行为。
代表团从第三方平台所有者许可茶匙定价的灵活性,它说,将导致额外的成本负担得起的网络的目标,会适得其反,印度联合工商会的发言人说。
室还提醒说,允许不受监管的第三方提供免费的数据将不利于茶匙,大量投资于基础设施。
商会指出,欧盟(EU)法规和美国的开放的互联网规则允许差别定价受到一定的界限,保持网络中立原则。
因此,“他们认识到必须提供技术和商业灵活性茶匙,“Assocham说。
因此,火车应该整体对相关问题的看法奥特服务、网络中立,相同的服务相同的规则和差别定价,新创的方法供应免费数据的问题,美国商会补充道。
室也反对任何形式的限制电信服务提供者(TSP)不可知论者的平台向消费者提供免费的数据,认为这样一个计划将添加一个不必要的,附加层之间的内容提供商、电信公司和消费者,这可能会导致额外的成本和效率降低,没有明确的所有权为消费者的不满。
“印度电信管理局(火车)可能会发现它在控制这样一个平台一个挑战火车法案的规定下,印度联合工商会”周一在一份声明中警告说。
“让技术和商业灵活性与对所有企业公平的竞争在互联网价值链,包括电信运营商也将促进宽带连接的目标,吸引投资和创新,从而使消费者选择上网,”美国商会补充道。
因此,印度电信室感觉政策框架应该鼓励多种商业模式下的忍耐与监管制度,而不是授权或禁止某些行为。
代表团从第三方平台所有者许可茶匙定价的灵活性,它说,将导致额外的成本负担得起的网络的目标,会适得其反,印度联合工商会的发言人说。
室还提醒说,允许不受监管的第三方提供免费的数据将不利于茶匙,大量投资于基础设施。
商会指出,欧盟(EU)法规和美国的开放的互联网规则允许差别定价受到一定的界限,保持网络中立原则。
因此,“他们认识到必须提供技术和商业灵活性茶匙,“Assocham说。
因此,火车应该整体对相关问题的看法奥特服务、网络中立,相同的服务相同的规则和差别定价,新创的方法供应免费数据的问题,美国商会补充道。
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动