\"<p>FILE
FILE PHOTO: An attendee holds two titanium Apple Watch Edition smart watches in the demonstration area during a launch event at their headquarters in Cupertino, California, U.S., September 10, 2019. REUTERS\/Stephen Lam<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>By Blake Brittain
<\/strong>
The Biden Administration will not overrule a U.S. International<\/a> Trade Commission decision that could block imports of Apple<\/a> Inc's Apple Watches for infringing AliveCor<\/a> Inc patents related to heart monitoring, the office of the U.S. Trade Representative said Tuesday.

An AliveCor spokesperson also said it had been informed there would be no veto of the ruling. Any
ITC<\/a> ban is still on hold while Apple and AliveCor continue to clash over the patents.

The ITC ruled in December that imports of Apple's smartwatches should be banned for infringing AliveCor's patents, but it placed the ban on pause while related proceedings over the patents run their course. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office found the patents invalid earlier that month, in a ruling that AliveCor has said it will appeal.

Apple said Tuesday it will appeal the ITC's import ban decision, which it said would have a negative effect on public health.

Representatives for the
White House<\/a> did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday. The ITC had no comment.

The White House had 60 days to decide whether to veto the ITC's Dec. 22 ruling based on policy concerns.

Presidential vetoes of ITC import bans have historically been rare. However, the Obama administration reversed a ban on some iPhones and iPads in 2013 in a patent fight between Apple and
Samsung Electronics<\/a> Co Ltd, citing its effects on U.S. consumers and economic competition.

AliveCor accused Apple of infringing three patents related to its KardiaBand, an
Apple Watch<\/a> accessory that monitors a user's heart rate, detects irregularities and performs an electrocardiogram to identify heart problems like atrial fibrillation.

Mountain View, California-based AliveCor told the ITC that Apple copied its technology and drove it out of the market by making Apple's operating system incompatible with the KardiaBand.

Apple Watch Series 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 have ECG technology. Apple introduced its most recent Series 8 last year.

AliveCor has separately sued Apple in California federal court for allegedly monopolizing the U.S. market for Apple Watch heart-rate apps, and filed a related patent infringement lawsuit against Apple in Texas federal court.

Apple has countersued AliveCor in San Francisco federal court for allegedly infringing its patents.

The ITC case is Certain Wearable Electronic
Devices<\/a> With ECG Functionality and Components Thereof, U.S. International Trade Commission, No. 337-TA-1266.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":98136315,"title":"New Data Bill to retain age of minors as those below 18","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/new-data-bill-to-retain-age-of-minors-as-those-below-18\/98136315","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":98136342,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Biden admin won't veto ITC's Apple Watch import ban ruling","synopsis":"The ITC ruled in December that imports of Apple's smartwatches should be banned for infringing AliveCor's patents, but it placed the ban on pause while related proceedings over the patents run their course. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office found the patents invalid earlier that month, in a ruling that AliveCor has said it will appeal.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/biden-admin-wont-veto-itcs-apple-watch-import-ban-ruling","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"Reuters","artdate":"2023-02-22 07:37:42","lastupd":"2023-02-22 07:39:33","breadcrumbTags":["Apple","white house","apple watch edition","Apple Watch","ITC","AliveCor","Devices","International","Samsung Electronics"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/biden-admin-wont-veto-itcs-apple-watch-import-ban-ruling"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2023-02-22" data-index="article_1">

拜登管理不会否决ITC的苹果看进口禁令裁决

12月美国国际贸易委员会裁定进口苹果的smartwatches应该禁止侵犯AliveCor的专利,但是它把禁令暂停相关程序在运行他们的专利。美国专利和商标办公室发现了专利无效这个月早些时候,在裁定AliveCor表示将提起上诉。

  • 更新于2023年2月22日07:39点坚持
< p >文件照片:一个参与者拥有两个苹果钛手表版智能手表在示范区发射事件在他们的总部位于加州,加州,美国,2019年9月10日。路透/林瑞麟< / p >
文件照片:一个参与者拥有两个苹果钛手表版智能手表在示范区发射事件在他们的总部位于加州,加州,美国,2019年9月10日。路透/斯蒂芬•林
由布莱克Brittain

拜登政府不会否决美国国际贸易委员会决定,可能会阻止进口苹果苹果(aapl . o:行情)的侵权手表AliveCor公司专利相关心脏监测、美国贸易代表办公室周二说。

AliveCor发言人也表示,它已被告知不会否决执政的。任何美国国际贸易委员会禁令仍搁置而苹果专利和AliveCor继续冲突。

广告
12月美国国际贸易委员会裁定进口苹果的smartwatches应该禁止侵犯AliveCor的专利,但是它把禁令暂停相关程序在运行他们的专利。美国专利和商标办公室发现了专利无效这个月早些时候,在裁定AliveCor表示将提起上诉。

苹果公司周二说,它将吸引美国国际贸易委员会的进口禁令的决定,称这将对公众健康产生负面影响。

代表的白宫没有立即回复记者的置评请求。美国国际贸易委员会没有发表评论。

白宫已经60天内决定是否否决美国国际贸易委员会的12月22日的裁决基于政策的担忧。

总统否决的ITC进口禁令在历史上是罕见的。然而,奥巴马政府推翻了禁止一些iphone和ipad在2013年与苹果之间的专利三星电子有限公司,称其对美国消费者的影响和经济竞争。

AliveCor指控苹果侵犯三个专利KardiaBand大小有关,一个苹果的手表辅助监控用户的心率,发现违规行为并执行心电图识别心脏病心房纤维性颤动。

总部位于加州山景城AliveCor对美国国际贸易委员会说,苹果复制技术,把它赶出市场,使苹果的操作系统不兼容KardiaBand。

广告
苹果系列看4、5、6、7和8有心电图技术。去年苹果公司推出了其最新系列8。

AliveCor已分别在加州联邦法院起诉苹果公司涉嫌垄断美国市场对苹果看心率的应用,并提出一个相关的专利侵权起诉苹果在德克萨斯州联邦法院。

苹果公司在旧金山联邦法院反诉AliveCor涉嫌侵犯其专利。

美国国际贸易委员会某些可穿戴电子设备与心电图功能和组件,美国国际贸易委员会337 - ta - 1266。
  • 发布于2023年2月22日07:37点坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
\"&lt;p&gt;FILE
FILE PHOTO: An attendee holds two titanium Apple Watch Edition smart watches in the demonstration area during a launch event at their headquarters in Cupertino, California, U.S., September 10, 2019. REUTERS\/Stephen Lam<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>By Blake Brittain
<\/strong>
The Biden Administration will not overrule a U.S. International<\/a> Trade Commission decision that could block imports of Apple<\/a> Inc's Apple Watches for infringing AliveCor<\/a> Inc patents related to heart monitoring, the office of the U.S. Trade Representative said Tuesday.

An AliveCor spokesperson also said it had been informed there would be no veto of the ruling. Any
ITC<\/a> ban is still on hold while Apple and AliveCor continue to clash over the patents.

The ITC ruled in December that imports of Apple's smartwatches should be banned for infringing AliveCor's patents, but it placed the ban on pause while related proceedings over the patents run their course. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office found the patents invalid earlier that month, in a ruling that AliveCor has said it will appeal.

Apple said Tuesday it will appeal the ITC's import ban decision, which it said would have a negative effect on public health.

Representatives for the
White House<\/a> did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday. The ITC had no comment.

The White House had 60 days to decide whether to veto the ITC's Dec. 22 ruling based on policy concerns.

Presidential vetoes of ITC import bans have historically been rare. However, the Obama administration reversed a ban on some iPhones and iPads in 2013 in a patent fight between Apple and
Samsung Electronics<\/a> Co Ltd, citing its effects on U.S. consumers and economic competition.

AliveCor accused Apple of infringing three patents related to its KardiaBand, an
Apple Watch<\/a> accessory that monitors a user's heart rate, detects irregularities and performs an electrocardiogram to identify heart problems like atrial fibrillation.

Mountain View, California-based AliveCor told the ITC that Apple copied its technology and drove it out of the market by making Apple's operating system incompatible with the KardiaBand.

Apple Watch Series 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 have ECG technology. Apple introduced its most recent Series 8 last year.

AliveCor has separately sued Apple in California federal court for allegedly monopolizing the U.S. market for Apple Watch heart-rate apps, and filed a related patent infringement lawsuit against Apple in Texas federal court.

Apple has countersued AliveCor in San Francisco federal court for allegedly infringing its patents.

The ITC case is Certain Wearable Electronic
Devices<\/a> With ECG Functionality and Components Thereof, U.S. International Trade Commission, No. 337-TA-1266.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":98136315,"title":"New Data Bill to retain age of minors as those below 18","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/new-data-bill-to-retain-age-of-minors-as-those-below-18\/98136315","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":98136342,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Biden admin won't veto ITC's Apple Watch import ban ruling","synopsis":"The ITC ruled in December that imports of Apple's smartwatches should be banned for infringing AliveCor's patents, but it placed the ban on pause while related proceedings over the patents run their course. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office found the patents invalid earlier that month, in a ruling that AliveCor has said it will appeal.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/biden-admin-wont-veto-itcs-apple-watch-import-ban-ruling","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"Reuters","artdate":"2023-02-22 07:37:42","lastupd":"2023-02-22 07:39:33","breadcrumbTags":["Apple","white house","apple watch edition","Apple Watch","ITC","AliveCor","Devices","International","Samsung Electronics"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/biden-admin-wont-veto-itcs-apple-watch-import-ban-ruling"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/biden-admin-wont-veto-itcs-apple-watch-import-ban-ruling/98136342">