\"<p>FILE
FILE PHOTO: A commuter using his mobile phone passes an advertisement of Chinese smartphone maker Oppo at a train station in Singapore May 8, 2014. REUTERS\/Edgar Su<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>The seed of the decision to separate the three companies was sown in October 2021 when India reportedly first put pressure on the BBK group companies to stop relying on Chinese partners and instead use local partners for product distribution. Come December 2021, Oppo<\/a> was accused by Indian regulators of tax evasion and payment of lesser custom duties through misdeclaring imported items and failing to include royalty and license fees in their value.

What we are seeing today in terms of separating
Realme<\/a> and One Plus as independent entities is to protect the current and future operations of these two companies in case of any government action against Oppo. While this may have been the reason given for the separation, the other reason could be the external commercial borrowing providers agreeing to infuse further cash in Oppo if they see it showing a profit after 7 years of losses.

The breakup should bring Oppo in profits for sure. Realme may have a little more time to show profits considering it was launched in 2018- 4 years later than Oppo.

It is also reported that Oppo will sell directly to distributors and large retail chains. The original business model was Chinese entities as distributors (in every state except Gujarat) selling to micro distributors who were reaching out to the retailers. Oppo’s major concerns seem to have been addressed.

However, the “separation” of brands and replacement of Chinese entities by Indian distributors comes with certain implications for the brands, distributors, and the retail channel. Not much changes in the day-to-day operations should be expected as the front end and back teams for all (except possibly for R&D) were separate in any case.

So, what are these implications?
<\/strong>
Brand
<\/strong>
With separate balance sheet and P & L for all 3 companies, Oppo and One Plus may be able to show good profits and increase their investments in the market in terms of marketing, margins and operational expenses. It should be noted that Oppo’s losses had reduced to just Rs 46 crore in 2022 and it would be logical to assume that if taken independently,

Oppo and One Plus would have been profitable companies with Realme in losses. So against 1 of the 2 BBK companies showing profits today, it would be 3 of the 4 BBK companies showing profits. On the other side, Realme as an independent company will possibly get saddled with big losses negatively affecting their offline drive which requires heavy investments and recurring high operational costs.

Distributors<\/strong>

The decision opens opportunities for the bigger Indian distributors to take up Oppo distribution for a state in case Oppo goes for a state distributor set up- an opportunity for distributors with high investment capabilities to get a bigger role. Also, an opportunity for those
Xiaomi<\/a> distributors who were used to high business volumes earlier now facing a downturn, switching loyalties. May be a blessing in disguise for the BBK group and a challenge for Xiaomi and to some extent Samsung<\/a> in such a scenario.

The possibility of the existing Chinese distributors in the back end with the Indian distributor only as a front cannot be ruled out initially as they understand the way the brand works better. In case they go for direct smaller distributors by cities, there would be no impact as the existing micro distributors are already up and running.

Retailers
<\/strong>
Not much impact operationally on the pop and mom stores as they will continue to deal with the distributors of their area as is the model today.

However, this will have a positive impact on the large chain stores with whom the brands would like to deal directly with higher margin supports. The concept of large chain stores is gaining ground in India and as per my estimates out of the 56% contribution of offline stores in India in Q1 2023, at least 50% business was from large chain stores.

This would go up further with large chain stores increasing their footprint with many pop and mom stores merging with them. Those pop & mom stores who don't align could find their survival difficult. Expect chain stores to go all out on board as many pop and mom stores as possible in the coming days.

(Ajay Sharma is presently Advisor, Techarc. Views expressed as personal.)<\/em><\/strong>
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":100372666,"title":"Apple stores in India to push other smartphone brands to rethink retail strategy","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/blog\/apple-stores-in-india-to-push-other-smartphone-brands-to-rethink-retail-strategy\/100372666","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"blog"}],"related_content":[],"msid":100866356,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"The restructuring of Oppo and its implications","synopsis":"\"Not much changes in the day-to-day operations should be expected as the front end and back teams for all (except possibly for R&D) were separate in any case,\" says Sharma. ","titleseo":"blog\/the-restructuring-of-oppo-and-its-implications","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Ajay Sharma","author_link":"\/author\/479260496\/ajay-sharma","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479260496.cms?width=100&height=100&hostid=268","author_additional":{"thumbsize":true,"msid":479260496,"author_name":"Ajay Sharma","author_seo_name":"ajay-sharma","designation":"Advisor","agency":false}}],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":1240,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":4618000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETTelecom","artdate":"2023-06-09 10:57:24","lastupd":"2023-06-09 10:57:24","breadcrumbTags":["Oppo","samsung","BBK group restructuring","technology news","Xiaomi","Vivo","Realme","smartphone industry","restructuring of Oppo"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"blog\/the-restructuring-of-oppo-and-its-implications"}}" data-authors="[" ajay sharma"]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2023-06-09" data-index="article_1">

相对应的人及其影响的重组

”没有多少变化的日常操作应该预期的前端和后台团队对所有(除了可能研发)在任何情况下,单独的“Sharma说。

Ajay沙玛
  • 发表在2023年6月9日,10:57坚持
阅读: 100年行业专业人士
读者的形象读到100年行业专业人士
< p >文件照片:一个通勤使用手机传递广告中国智能手机制造商的朋友在火车站在新加坡5月8日,2014年。路透/埃德加苏< / p >
文件照片:一个通勤使用手机传递中国智能手机制造商的广告相对应的人在火车站在新加坡5月8日,2014年。路透/埃德加苏
决定将三家公司的种子播种在2021年10月当印度报道第一次施压BBK集团公司停止依赖中国合作伙伴,而不是使用本地合作伙伴的产品分布。2021年12月,相对应的人印度监管机构被指控逃税和支付较低的关税通过misdeclaring进口商品和未能包括皇室和许可费用的价值。

广告
我们看到今天的分离Realme和1 +作为独立的实体是保护这两个公司的当前和未来的业务对同僚任何政府的行动。虽然这可能是分离的原因,另一个原因可能是外部商业贷款提供者同意注入更多现金在相对应的人,如果他们看到它显示利润经过7年的损失。

分手应该把朋友的利润。Realme可能有更多的时间来显示利润考虑,这是2018年推出比同僚- 4年后。

也报道,朋友将直接卖给经销商和大型零售连锁店。最初的商业模式是中国实体分销商(每个州古吉拉特邦除外)卖给微分销商与零售商。相对应的人的主要问题似乎已经解决。

然而,“分离”的品牌和替代中国实体的印度品牌经销商有一定的影响,经销商和零售渠道。没有多少的变化日常操作应该预期的前端和后台团队对所有(除了可能研发)是独立的在任何情况下。

广告
所以,这些影响是什么?

品牌

单独的资产负债表和P & L 3家公司,朋友和1 +可以显示良好的利润和增加投资在市场营销方面,利润率和操作费用。应该注意的是,朋友的损失减少到2022年的46个卢比,是逻辑假设,如果独立,

同僚和1 + Realme的盈利公司的损失。所以对1的2 BBK公司今天显示利润,这将是3的4 BBK公司利润。另一方面,Realme作为独立公司可能会背负着巨额亏损负面影响他们的离线开车需要大量投资和重复出现的高运营成本。

分销商

决定打开机会更大的印度经销商拿起同僚分布状态,以防同僚适用于一个国家经销商建立——一个分销商的机会高投资能力发挥更大的作用。同样,一个人的机会小米分销商是用于高业务量现在面临衰退,早些时候切换的忠诚。可能因祸得福BBK组和小米,某种程度上挑战吗三星在这种情况下。

中国现有分销商的可能性后端与印度经销商只作为前不能排除最初他们更好地理解品牌的工作方式。以防他们去直接分销商的小城市,不会影响现有的微分销商已经启动并运行。

零售商

不影响操作的流行和妈妈商店将继续处理区域的经销商是当今模型。

然而,这将产生积极影响的大型连锁店的品牌想直接处理利润率较高的支持。大型连锁商店的概念是在印度取得进展,按照我的估计,从56%的贡献离线商店在印度2023年一季度,至少50%的业务来自大型连锁商店。

这将进一步上升,大型连锁店增加他们的足迹与许多流行和妈妈商店合并。那些不对齐的流行&妈妈商店可以找到他们的生存困难。希望连锁店全力以赴上尽可能多的流行和妈妈商店在未来几天。

(Ajay Sharma目前顾问Techarc。作为个人观点。)
  • 发表在2023年6月9日,10:57坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
\"&lt;p&gt;FILE
FILE PHOTO: A commuter using his mobile phone passes an advertisement of Chinese smartphone maker Oppo at a train station in Singapore May 8, 2014. REUTERS\/Edgar Su<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>The seed of the decision to separate the three companies was sown in October 2021 when India reportedly first put pressure on the BBK group companies to stop relying on Chinese partners and instead use local partners for product distribution. Come December 2021, Oppo<\/a> was accused by Indian regulators of tax evasion and payment of lesser custom duties through misdeclaring imported items and failing to include royalty and license fees in their value.

What we are seeing today in terms of separating
Realme<\/a> and One Plus as independent entities is to protect the current and future operations of these two companies in case of any government action against Oppo. While this may have been the reason given for the separation, the other reason could be the external commercial borrowing providers agreeing to infuse further cash in Oppo if they see it showing a profit after 7 years of losses.

The breakup should bring Oppo in profits for sure. Realme may have a little more time to show profits considering it was launched in 2018- 4 years later than Oppo.

It is also reported that Oppo will sell directly to distributors and large retail chains. The original business model was Chinese entities as distributors (in every state except Gujarat) selling to micro distributors who were reaching out to the retailers. Oppo’s major concerns seem to have been addressed.

However, the “separation” of brands and replacement of Chinese entities by Indian distributors comes with certain implications for the brands, distributors, and the retail channel. Not much changes in the day-to-day operations should be expected as the front end and back teams for all (except possibly for R&D) were separate in any case.

So, what are these implications?
<\/strong>
Brand
<\/strong>
With separate balance sheet and P & L for all 3 companies, Oppo and One Plus may be able to show good profits and increase their investments in the market in terms of marketing, margins and operational expenses. It should be noted that Oppo’s losses had reduced to just Rs 46 crore in 2022 and it would be logical to assume that if taken independently,

Oppo and One Plus would have been profitable companies with Realme in losses. So against 1 of the 2 BBK companies showing profits today, it would be 3 of the 4 BBK companies showing profits. On the other side, Realme as an independent company will possibly get saddled with big losses negatively affecting their offline drive which requires heavy investments and recurring high operational costs.

Distributors<\/strong>

The decision opens opportunities for the bigger Indian distributors to take up Oppo distribution for a state in case Oppo goes for a state distributor set up- an opportunity for distributors with high investment capabilities to get a bigger role. Also, an opportunity for those
Xiaomi<\/a> distributors who were used to high business volumes earlier now facing a downturn, switching loyalties. May be a blessing in disguise for the BBK group and a challenge for Xiaomi and to some extent Samsung<\/a> in such a scenario.

The possibility of the existing Chinese distributors in the back end with the Indian distributor only as a front cannot be ruled out initially as they understand the way the brand works better. In case they go for direct smaller distributors by cities, there would be no impact as the existing micro distributors are already up and running.

Retailers
<\/strong>
Not much impact operationally on the pop and mom stores as they will continue to deal with the distributors of their area as is the model today.

However, this will have a positive impact on the large chain stores with whom the brands would like to deal directly with higher margin supports. The concept of large chain stores is gaining ground in India and as per my estimates out of the 56% contribution of offline stores in India in Q1 2023, at least 50% business was from large chain stores.

This would go up further with large chain stores increasing their footprint with many pop and mom stores merging with them. Those pop & mom stores who don't align could find their survival difficult. Expect chain stores to go all out on board as many pop and mom stores as possible in the coming days.

(Ajay Sharma is presently Advisor, Techarc. Views expressed as personal.)<\/em><\/strong>
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":100372666,"title":"Apple stores in India to push other smartphone brands to rethink retail strategy","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/blog\/apple-stores-in-india-to-push-other-smartphone-brands-to-rethink-retail-strategy\/100372666","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"blog"}],"related_content":[],"msid":100866356,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"The restructuring of Oppo and its implications","synopsis":"\"Not much changes in the day-to-day operations should be expected as the front end and back teams for all (except possibly for R&D) were separate in any case,\" says Sharma. ","titleseo":"blog\/the-restructuring-of-oppo-and-its-implications","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Ajay Sharma","author_link":"\/author\/479260496\/ajay-sharma","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479260496.cms?width=100&height=100&hostid=268","author_additional":{"thumbsize":true,"msid":479260496,"author_name":"Ajay Sharma","author_seo_name":"ajay-sharma","designation":"Advisor","agency":false}}],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":1240,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":4618000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETTelecom","artdate":"2023-06-09 10:57:24","lastupd":"2023-06-09 10:57:24","breadcrumbTags":["Oppo","samsung","BBK group restructuring","technology news","Xiaomi","Vivo","Realme","smartphone industry","restructuring of Oppo"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"blog\/the-restructuring-of-oppo-and-its-implications"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/blog/the-restructuring-of-oppo-and-its-implications/100866356">