独家

CAG夺取国家电网公司的不足在电信业的定价方法

CAG说,“有不足由公司在随后的定价方法。乘法因子采用扩大高等能力很低,关税收入产生负面影响。定价的不可剥夺的权利使用(电位)合同是与不同的方法适用于不同的合同不一致,导致较低的收入业务。”

新德里8月7()审计和审计(CAG今天用官方传播效用电网公司不足的定价方法之后,它在提供折扣和缺乏透明度电信业务。“多样化的电信业务是值得称道的,使得该公司在两个重要的服务领域即电力和电信。然而审计发现PGCIL无法达到预期的市场份额在电信业务,虽然业务收入利润自2009 - 10,它还没有实现回报预期到2007年,”CAG说今天在国会在其报告中提出。

CAG说,“有不足由公司在随后的定价方法。乘法因子采用扩大高等能力很低,关税收入产生负面影响。定价的不可剥夺的权利使用(电位)合同是与不同的方法适用于不同的合同不一致,导致较低的收入业务。”

“该公司提供的折扣上限关税是透明的和非歧视性的。缺陷被发现在共享的收入与国家传播工具为电信业务使用传输资产。观察制定的财务影响412.88卢比(399.48卢比相关定价方法和13.40卢比分享相关的收入和津贴的停机时间信贷)。”

CAG推荐”,该公司可能审查的乘数扩大带宽价格符合火车通知。该公司可能也为电位合同框架统一的定价方法。透明的标准向客户提供折扣可能制定和统一实施。”KKS MR MR

遵循和联系我们,脸谱网,Linkedin,Youtube
New Delhi, Aug 7 () The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG<\/a>) today rapped state-run transmission utility Power Grid Corporation<\/a> for inadequacies in pricing methodology followed by it and lack of transparency in offering discounts for its telecom<\/a> business. \"Diversification into telecom business by the Company was commendable and enabled the company to operate in two important service areas viz. Power and Telecom. However Audit noticed that PGCIL could not achieve the projected market share in telecom business and though the business has been earning profits since 2009-10, it is yet to achieve payback which was anticipated by 2007,\" the CAG said in its report tabled in Parliament today.

The CAG observed, \"There were inadequacies in the pricing methodology followed by the Company. The multiplication factor adopted to scale up tariff for higher capacities was low, which adversely impacted revenue. Pricing of Indefeasible Right to Use (IRU) contracts was inconsistent with different methods applied for different contracts, leading to lower revenue for the business.\"

\"The discounts offered by the Company on ceiling tariff were neither transparent nor non-discriminatory. Shortcomings were noticed in sharing of revenue with State transmission utilities for using transmission assets for telecom business. The financial impact of observations worked out to Rs 412.88 crore (Rs 399.48 crore related to pricing methodology and Rs 13.40 crore related to sharing of income and allowance of downtime credit).\"