独家
中国国家开发银行写入调频吧Sitharaman,寻求实现依赖鼓吹决议
决议计划涉及Jio采购RITL大约4000卢比已经一直悬而未决,电信公司后发现一批银行包括印度国家银行RTIL列为虚假账户但未披露国家公司法法庭(NCLT)或Jio。
决议计划涉及Jio采购RITL大约4000卢比已经一直悬而未决,电信公司后发现一批银行包括印度国家银行已经上市的RTIL作为一个虚假账户但未披露国家公司法法庭(NCLT)或Jio。
账户的分类作为印度的银行内部欺诈是一个问题,中国银行的信中表示,1月25日。“这不应该影响RITL企业破产解决过程(CIRP)或NCLT批准决议计划的实现,”它补充道在信中,其中一个副本等。
中国银行还要求立法修正案,以阻止这种推迟债务解决流程在未来。
NCLT已经批准了这项决议计划提出的信实物业和项目管理服务有限公司(RPPMSL) Jio的子公司,2020年12月。然而,在此之前一个月批准,印度国家银行,海外银行和印度印度联合银行分类RITL作为欺诈帐户。他们没有通知NCLT虽然决议应用程序被检查。
这件事被公开时,Jio联盟寻求细节从印度国家银行,宣布需要评估是否由印度银行的欺诈分类构成实质性的不利影响下定义的决议计划。
打开以外的“第三方技术”自己的5 g:依赖Jio总统欧门马修
“印度应将光谱干扰和我们需要适量的频谱在正确的价值拍卖成功。运营商可以利用光谱的全部价值,”欧门在独家互动等。
不久之后,印度国家银行通知NCLT将撤回“欺诈”标签RITL决议计划已经实现,还说不会影响分类RPPMSL或其董事。
信中提到最近最高法院审判类似的问题涉及Ebix新加坡和Educomp解决方案的债权人,在最高法院已经裁定,一次决议计划委员会批准贷款,解决申请人不得撤销或修改。
![\"China](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/figure>New Delhi: China Development Bank<\/a> has written to finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman<\/a>, calling upon the government to ensure that an affiliate of Reliance Jio<\/a> immediately pays and implements the debt resolution process for Reliance Infratel Ltd (RITL), which had been approved by the bankruptcy tribunal in December 2020.The resolution plan which involves Jio purchasing RITL for about Rs 4,000 crore has been kept in abeyance, after the telecom company found that a clutch of banks including State Bank of India<\/a> had listed RTIL<\/a> as a fraudulent account but not disclosed it either to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT<\/a>) or Jio.
The classification of the account as fraudulent is an issue internal to Indian banks, the Chinese lender said in its letter, dated January 25. \u201cThis should not affect RITL\u2019s corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) or the implementation of an NCLT approved resolution plan,\u201d it added in the letter, a copy of which ET has seen.
<\/div><\/div>China Development Bank, along with a handful of Chinese lenders, had accounted for Rs 13,485 crore of RITL\u2019s Rs 41,500 crore debt.
The Chinese bank has also asked for legislative amendments to deter such delay in debt resolution processes in future.
The NCLT had approved the resolution plan proposed by Reliance Property and Project Management Services Ltd (RPPMSL), an affiliate of Jio, in December 2020. However, a month prior to this approval, SBI, Indian Overseas bank and Union Bank of India<\/a> had classified RITL as a fraud account. They did not inform the NCLT about this while the resolution application was being examined by it.
When the matter became public, the Jio affiliate sought details from SBI, stating it needed to assess whether the \u2018fraud classification\u2019 by the Indian banks would constitute a material adverse effect as defined under the resolution plan.
The Chinese bank has also asked for legislative amendments to deter such delay in debt resolution processes in future.
The NCLT had approved the resolution plan proposed by Reliance Property and Project Management Services Ltd (RPPMSL), an affiliate of Jio, in December 2020. However, a month prior to this approval, SBI, Indian Overseas bank and Union Bank of India<\/a> had classified RITL as a fraud account. They did not inform the NCLT about this while the resolution application was being examined by it.
When the matter became public, the Jio affiliate sought details from SBI, stating it needed to assess whether the \u2018fraud classification\u2019 by the Indian banks would constitute a material adverse effect as defined under the resolution plan.