\"<p>Mehta’s
Mehta’s comments have come on the back of Non-Personal Data (NPD) draft, on which the Centre has invited feedback from the industry. <\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>NEW DELHI: The Data Protection Authority<\/a> should be the sole data regulator in the country, said Udai S. Mehta<\/a>, Deputy Executive Director, CUTS International<\/a>, and added that there was a need to adopt a ‘whole government system approach’ towards data regulation.

Mehta’s comments have come on the back of Non-Personal Data (
NPD<\/a>) draft, on which the Centre has invited feedback from the industry<\/a>.

Cautioning against having different regulators in cognate sectors, he said that the report appropriately considers the sensitivity of
NPD<\/a> in the light of personal data as given in the Personal Data Protection Bill<\/a> 2019 (PDPB), the report is devoid of data principals<\/a>, as is the case with the PDPB.

Mehta said that even though the report stresses on ‘light-weight regulation and remains conscious of the compliance costs of regulation’ but it misses out on emphasising scientific and inclusive regulation-making process, such as undertaking regulatory impact assessment; framing risk-based regulations giving due consideration to rights of data principals; and ensuring regulatory harmonisation.

Read also<\/h4>
<\/a><\/figure>
Govt invites feedback on non-personal data governance draft report<\/a><\/h5><\/div>
<\/a><\/figure>
5G’s enhanced capabilities to unlock new consumer, industrial use cases: Paulraj<\/a><\/h5><\/div><\/div><\/div>
The report recommends securing the consent of data principals for processing NPD, along with personal data but it increases the risks of consent fatigue and the report additionally does not comprehensively discuss the rights of data principals, such as the actions they are eligible to take in case of violation of rights. ‘The avenues and mechanisms for data principals to avail redress of their grievances are also not discussed adequately,’ Mehta said.

Mehta also argued that the report misses out on recommending of upholding of ‘principles of necessity, legality, and proportionality’ as the report empowers the government to request access to NPD for security, legal, law enforcement, and regulatory purposes

The report further calls for mandating of sharing of NPD to open up competition for startups, however, Mehta argued that such a step may not bode well with the startup ecosystem for fostering competition and suggested an enabling environment through data sharing could be envisaged for the same.

“The report has rightly excluded algorithms and proprietary knowledge from the ambit of data sharing,” he added.

He suggested that areas like the relation between data custodian and data principals, trusteeship model for enforcing rights of community data principals, and management of data trusts, among others require further scrutiny.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":76997334,"title":"DoT mulls data networks for rural connectivity, BSNL set to lose","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/dot-mulls-data-networks-for-rural-connectivity-bsnl-mtnl-set-to-lose\/76997334","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":76997738,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Data Protection Authority should be sole data regulator in India: CUTS","synopsis":"The Data Protection Authority should be the sole data regulator in the country, said Udai S. Mehta, Deputy Executive Director, CUTS International, and added that there was a need to adopt a \u2018whole government system approach\u2019 towards data regulation. ","titleseo":"telecomnews\/data-protection-authority-should-be-sole-data-regulator-in-india-cuts","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":524,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":2434000,"url":"https:\/\/ettelecom.indiatimes.com\/telecomnews\/data-protection-authority-should-be-sole-data-regulator-in-india-cuts\/articleshow\/76997738.cms"},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETTelecom","artdate":"2020-07-16 15:38:03","lastupd":"2020-07-16 15:38:03","breadcrumbTags":["data protection bill","Personal Data Protection Bill","Data Protection Authority","NPD","data principals","Non-Personal Data (NPD) draft","udai s. mehta","Industry","Cuts International"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/data-protection-authority-should-be-sole-data-regulator-in-india-cuts"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2020-07-16" data-index="article_1">

数据保护机构应该唯一数据监管机构在印度:削减

数据保护机构应该唯一数据监管机构,Udai s . Mehta说副执行主任,削减国际,并补充说,有必要采用一种对数据的整个政府体系的监管。< / p >

  • 发布于2020年7月16日下午03:38坚持
阅读: 100年行业专业人士
读者的形象读到100年行业专业人士
< p >梅塔的评论的非个人数据(NPD)草案,该中心已邀请来自行业的反馈。< / p >
梅塔的评论的非个人数据(NPD)草案,该中心已邀请来自行业的反馈。
新德里:数据保护机构应该是唯一的数据监管机构,说的吗Udai s·梅塔副执行主任削减国际,并补充说,有必要采用一种对数据的整个政府体系的监管。

梅塔的评论的非个人数据(NPD)草案,该中心邀请的反馈行业

警惕在同源领域有不同的监管机构,他说,该报告适当考虑的敏感性NPD的个人资料中给出个人数据保护法案2019 (PDPB),报告是没有的数据主体,与PDPB一样。

广告
梅塔表示,尽管该报告强调“轻量级的监管和仍然意识到规定的合规成本但它遗漏了在强调科学和包容性规范制订过程,如进行监管影响评估;框架基于风险的规定给予适当考虑数据的权利主体;并确保监管协调。

读也


报告建议确保数据主体的同意处理NPD,连同个人资料,但增加的风险报告另外同意疲劳和不全面讨论数据主体的权利,如他们有资格采取的行动违反人权。数据主体的途径和机制效果的纠正他们的不满也不是充分讨论,”梅塔说。

梅塔还认为,该报告遗漏了推荐的维护原则的必要性、合法性和比例的报告使政府请求访问NPD对安全、法律、执法和监管的目的

报告进一步呼吁要求NPD开放共享的竞争对于创业公司来说,然而,梅塔认为,此举可能预示的创业生态系统培养竞争和建议有利环境通过数据共享可以设想。

”报告已经正确地排除算法和专有知识范围的数据共享,”他补充道。

广告
他建议等领域数据托管人和数据之间的关系主体,托管模式执行权利主体的社区数据,数据和管理信托等需要进一步审查。
  • 发布于2020年7月16日下午03:38坚持

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

\"&lt;p&gt;Mehta’s
Mehta’s comments have come on the back of Non-Personal Data (NPD) draft, on which the Centre has invited feedback from the industry. <\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>NEW DELHI: The Data Protection Authority<\/a> should be the sole data regulator in the country, said Udai S. Mehta<\/a>, Deputy Executive Director, CUTS International<\/a>, and added that there was a need to adopt a ‘whole government system approach’ towards data regulation.

Mehta’s comments have come on the back of Non-Personal Data (
NPD<\/a>) draft, on which the Centre has invited feedback from the industry<\/a>.

Cautioning against having different regulators in cognate sectors, he said that the report appropriately considers the sensitivity of
NPD<\/a> in the light of personal data as given in the Personal Data Protection Bill<\/a> 2019 (PDPB), the report is devoid of data principals<\/a>, as is the case with the PDPB.

Mehta said that even though the report stresses on ‘light-weight regulation and remains conscious of the compliance costs of regulation’ but it misses out on emphasising scientific and inclusive regulation-making process, such as undertaking regulatory impact assessment; framing risk-based regulations giving due consideration to rights of data principals; and ensuring regulatory harmonisation.

Read also<\/h4>
<\/a><\/figure>
Govt invites feedback on non-personal data governance draft report<\/a><\/h5><\/div>
<\/a><\/figure>
5G’s enhanced capabilities to unlock new consumer, industrial use cases: Paulraj<\/a><\/h5><\/div><\/div><\/div>
The report recommends securing the consent of data principals for processing NPD, along with personal data but it increases the risks of consent fatigue and the report additionally does not comprehensively discuss the rights of data principals, such as the actions they are eligible to take in case of violation of rights. ‘The avenues and mechanisms for data principals to avail redress of their grievances are also not discussed adequately,’ Mehta said.

Mehta also argued that the report misses out on recommending of upholding of ‘principles of necessity, legality, and proportionality’ as the report empowers the government to request access to NPD for security, legal, law enforcement, and regulatory purposes

The report further calls for mandating of sharing of NPD to open up competition for startups, however, Mehta argued that such a step may not bode well with the startup ecosystem for fostering competition and suggested an enabling environment through data sharing could be envisaged for the same.

“The report has rightly excluded algorithms and proprietary knowledge from the ambit of data sharing,” he added.

He suggested that areas like the relation between data custodian and data principals, trusteeship model for enforcing rights of community data principals, and management of data trusts, among others require further scrutiny.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":76997334,"title":"DoT mulls data networks for rural connectivity, BSNL set to lose","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/dot-mulls-data-networks-for-rural-connectivity-bsnl-mtnl-set-to-lose\/76997334","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":76997738,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Data Protection Authority should be sole data regulator in India: CUTS","synopsis":"The Data Protection Authority should be the sole data regulator in the country, said Udai S. Mehta, Deputy Executive Director, CUTS International, and added that there was a need to adopt a \u2018whole government system approach\u2019 towards data regulation. ","titleseo":"telecomnews\/data-protection-authority-should-be-sole-data-regulator-in-india-cuts","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":524,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":2434000,"url":"https:\/\/ettelecom.indiatimes.com\/telecomnews\/data-protection-authority-should-be-sole-data-regulator-in-india-cuts\/articleshow\/76997738.cms"},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETTelecom","artdate":"2020-07-16 15:38:03","lastupd":"2020-07-16 15:38:03","breadcrumbTags":["data protection bill","Personal Data Protection Bill","Data Protection Authority","NPD","data principals","Non-Personal Data (NPD) draft","udai s. mehta","Industry","Cuts International"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/data-protection-authority-should-be-sole-data-regulator-in-india-cuts"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/data-protection-authority-should-be-sole-data-regulator-in-india-cuts/76997738">