\n
\nDoT, which was the nodal body that gave out telecom licences on first-come-first-served basis in 2008, had gone into a huddle on Thursday to review the judgement which hauled it for inefficiencies, convoluted way of writing down guidelines, disordered functioning and a lack of understanding of regulations, besides being a regular source for leaking information.
\n
“It is business as usual here,” said a senior official, who did not wish to be named. “We are well aware of the policy<\/a> which was followed at that time, but the policy has since changed, so it does not affect us,” he added.
\n
\nDoT officers got a big boost after Telecom Minister Manoj Sinha said on Thursday that the current policy of spectrum being sold through auctions since 2012 was transparent and correct, and tagged 2G spectrum procedure used back in 2008 “wrong and corrupt”.
\n
\n“Earlier, CVC (Central Vigilance Commission) had investigated the 2008 spectrum auction and had found it wrong,” he told reporters. “One must pay attention to what CVC had to say about the 2015-2016 spectrum auction, CVC has applauded the department for transparency and has given an award in 2017 for transparency,” he said.
\n
\nHe added that there was no longer spectrum shortage, the auction process epitomises transparency and service providers were no longer complaining. DoT officials who had closely observed the developments in the 2G case through the day on Thursday were busy looking into files related to different issues that the department faces, such as recommendations for relief under the inter-ministerial group (IMG) and holding meetings with industry representatives on Friday.
\n
\nALSO READ: Government rolls out BharatNet Phase 2, aims 100% connectivity by 2020<\/a><\/strong>
\n
\nThe court had on Thursday criticised DoT for not having clarity in the policies and guidelines, adding that rules were framed ‘in such technical language that meaning of many terms are not clear even to DoT officers’. The 2G special judge OP Saini questioned that if DoT officers do not understand the departmental guidelines and their glossary, how could they blame companies\/others for violation of the same.
\n<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":62216812,"title":"Airtel Payments Bank head Shashi Arora quits","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/airtel-payments-bank-head-shashi-arora-quits\/62216812","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":62216876,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"DoT unfazed, focuses on Bharat Net","synopsis":"\u201cWe are well aware of the policy which was followed at that time, but the policy has since changed, so it does not affect us,\u201d he added.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/dot-unfazed-focuses-on-bharat-net","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Gulveen Aulakh","author_link":"\/author\/19656\/gulveen-aulakh","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/19656.cms?width=100&height=100","author_additional":{"thumbsize":true,"msid":19656,"author_name":"Gulveen Aulakh","author_seo_name":"gulveen-aulakh","designation":"Assistant Editor","agency":false}}],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2017-12-23 08:56:08","lastupd":"2017-12-23 09:00:47","breadcrumbTags":["Bharat net","2G spectrum case","DoT","CBI","OP Saini","policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/dot-unfazed-focuses-on-bharat-net"}}" data-authors="[" gulveen aulakh"]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2017-12-23" data-index="article_1">
新德里:电信部门的官员(点)不让写了特别的严厉批评CBI(中央调查局)法官OP赛在他的命令2 g频谱情况,权衡下来,关注其他问题,确保2019年3月的最后期限巴拉特净是满足。
点,给出了电信牌照的节点的身体“先来先得”的原则招收2008年,已经变成一个蜷缩在周四审查判断拖它的效率低下,错综复杂的方式写下指南,无序运作,缺乏对法规的理解,除了常规的泄漏信息的来源。
“这里一切如常”,一位高级官员说,不愿具名。“我们非常清楚政策这之后,但政策已经改变,所以它不会影响我们,”他补充道。
点军官大大提振后电信部长Manoj Sinha周四表示,当前的政策的频谱通过拍卖出售自2012年以来是透明的和正确的,和标记2 g频谱使用过程早在2008年“错误和腐败”。
“早些时候,CVC(中央警戒委员会)调查了2008频谱拍卖,发现错了,”他告诉记者。”一个必须注意CVC所对2015 - 2016年的频谱拍卖,CVC称赞透明度和已经在2017年被授予荣誉透明度,”他说。
他补充说,不再有频谱短缺,拍卖过程体现透明度和服务提供者不再抱怨。点官员密切观察事态发展在2 g的情况下通过周四一天忙着调查文件相关部门面临着不同的问题,如建议救援部际集团(IMG)和下周五与行业代表举行会议。
还读:政府推出BharatNet第二阶段,目的是连接到2020年的100%
法院周四批评点没有清晰的政策和指导方针,并补充说规则框架的技术语言,许多术语的含义不明确甚至点军官。2 g特别法官OP赛质疑,如果点人员不了解部门指导方针和他们的词汇,他们怎么能责怪公司/其他违反相同的。
点,给出了电信牌照的节点的身体“先来先得”的原则招收2008年,已经变成一个蜷缩在周四审查判断拖它的效率低下,错综复杂的方式写下指南,无序运作,缺乏对法规的理解,除了常规的泄漏信息的来源。
“这里一切如常”,一位高级官员说,不愿具名。“我们非常清楚政策这之后,但政策已经改变,所以它不会影响我们,”他补充道。
点军官大大提振后电信部长Manoj Sinha周四表示,当前的政策的频谱通过拍卖出售自2012年以来是透明的和正确的,和标记2 g频谱使用过程早在2008年“错误和腐败”。
“早些时候,CVC(中央警戒委员会)调查了2008频谱拍卖,发现错了,”他告诉记者。”一个必须注意CVC所对2015 - 2016年的频谱拍卖,CVC称赞透明度和已经在2017年被授予荣誉透明度,”他说。
他补充说,不再有频谱短缺,拍卖过程体现透明度和服务提供者不再抱怨。点官员密切观察事态发展在2 g的情况下通过周四一天忙着调查文件相关部门面临着不同的问题,如建议救援部际集团(IMG)和下周五与行业代表举行会议。
还读:政府推出BharatNet第二阶段,目的是连接到2020年的100%
法院周四批评点没有清晰的政策和指导方针,并补充说规则框架的技术语言,许多术语的含义不明确甚至点军官。2 g特别法官OP赛质疑,如果点人员不了解部门指导方针和他们的词汇,他们怎么能责怪公司/其他违反相同的。
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动