独家
关税逃避:印度问题通知小米恢复Rs653卢比
“根据情报(提示),M / s小米科技印度私人有限公司(小米印度)被低估,逃避关税收入情报理事会发起的调查(DRI)对小米印度和它的合同制造商,”据加以声明。
“根据情报(提示),M / s小米科技印度私人有限公司(小米印度)是逃避关税低估,理事会发起的调查的收入情报(DRI)对小米印度和它的合同制造商,”据加以声明。
在调查期间,搜索进行了缉私局小米前提的印度,导致经济复苏受牵连的文档表明小米印度汇款皇室和许可费美国高通公司和北京小米手机软件有限公司根据合同义务,按照官方声明。
所得税(IT)部门也进行了的搜索在同僚在各种状态及其合作伙伴的前提。国务院上周表示两家公司可能被罚款1000卢比因违反法律有关保密的关联方交易,除了调查公司因涉嫌虚假借款超过5000卢比。没有这两家公司的名称,但消息人士称他们是小米和相对应的人。
“在印度小米,我们给至关重要保证遵守所有的印度法律。我们目前正在评估详细通知。作为一个负责任的公司,我们将支持当局和所有必要的文件,”小米发言人在一份声明中说
”语句小米印度和它的关键人员合同的生产记录,在此期间的董事之一小米印度确认支付说,”加以声明补充道。
在调查期间,进一步出现“皇室和执照费”支付的小米印度美国高通公司和北京小米手机软件有限公司,中国(印度小米的关联方)没有添加以小米印度进口货物的成交价格和合同制造商。
MI品牌手机制造的合同制造商专门卖给小米印度,在合同条款协议。
DRI在调查期间收集的证据表明小米印度和它的制造合同包括皇室的数量由小米印度支付进口货物的应评税值由小米印度及其合同制造商,这是违反海关的14节,1962年和海关估价(确定进口货物的价值)2007年规则。
皇室成员和“不添加许可证费”的交易价值,小米印度是逃避关税进口手机的受益所有人,零部件,”声明说。
朋友,小米可以对违法罚款1000卢比:它的部门
“虚假借款仍在审查和大致挂钩Rs.5000卢比。运营以来的一个来自中国的公司管理,信息仍在研究和审查的过程中,”一位官员解释说的发展。
![\"Customs](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/figure>NEW DELHI: The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence<\/a> (DRI) has issued three show cause notices to Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi<\/a> for demand and recovery of duty amounting to Rs 653 crore for the period 01.04.2017 to 30.06.2020 under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, according to an official statement.\"Based upon an intelligence (tip) that M\/s Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited (Xiaomi India<\/a>) was evading customs duty<\/a> by way of undervaluation, an investigation was initiated by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) against Xiaomi India and its contract manufacturers,\" according to a PIB statement.
During the investigation, searches were conducted by the anti-smuggling agency at the premises of Xiaomi India, which led to the recovery of incriminating documents indicating that Xiaomi India was remitting royalty and licence fee to Qualcomm USA and to Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd. under contractual obligation, as per an official statement.
<\/div><\/div>The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence had also searched the factories of Foxconn India's unit, Bharat FIH, and Dixon Technologies in South India. Bharat FIH and Dixon are contract manufacturers for Xiaomi.
The Income Tax (IT) department had also conducted searches at Oppo and its partners' premises across various states. The department last week said the two companies can be fined Rs 1,000 crore for violating the law pertaining to non-disclosure of related party transactions, in addition to probing the companies for alleged bogus borrowings of over Rs 5,000 crore. It didn\u2019t name the two firms, but sources said they were Xiaomi and Oppo.
\"At Xiaomi India, we give utmost importance to ensuring we comply with all Indian laws. We are currently reviewing the notice in detail. As a responsible company, we will support the authorities with all necessary documentation,\" Xiaomi spokesperson said in a statement
\"Statements of key persons of Xiaomi India and its contract manufactures were recorded, during which one of the directors of Xiaomi India confirmed the said payments,\" the PIB statement added.
During the investigations, it further emerged that the \u201croyalty and license fee\u201d paid by Xiaomi India to Qualcomm USA and to Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd., China (related party of Xiaomi India) were not being added in the transaction value of the goods imported by Xiaomi India and its contract manufacturers.
The Income Tax (IT) department had also conducted searches at Oppo and its partners' premises across various states. The department last week said the two companies can be fined Rs 1,000 crore for violating the law pertaining to non-disclosure of related party transactions, in addition to probing the companies for alleged bogus borrowings of over Rs 5,000 crore. It didn\u2019t name the two firms, but sources said they were Xiaomi and Oppo.
\"At Xiaomi India, we give utmost importance to ensuring we comply with all Indian laws. We are currently reviewing the notice in detail. As a responsible company, we will support the authorities with all necessary documentation,\" Xiaomi spokesperson said in a statement
\"Statements of key persons of Xiaomi India and its contract manufactures were recorded, during which one of the directors of Xiaomi India confirmed the said payments,\" the PIB statement added.
During the investigations, it further emerged that the \u201croyalty and license fee\u201d paid by Xiaomi India to Qualcomm USA and to Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd., China (related party of Xiaomi India) were not being added in the transaction value of the goods imported by Xiaomi India and its contract manufacturers.
<\/div><\/div>The investigations conducted by the DRI further showed that Xiaomi India is engaged in the sale of MI brand mobile phones and these mobile phones are either imported by Xiaomi India or assembled in India by importing parts and components of mobile phones by contract manufacturers of Xiaomi India.
The MI brand mobile phones manufactured by the contract manufacturers are sold exclusively to Xiaomi India, in terms of the contract agreement.
Evidence gathered during the investigations by the DRI indicated that neither Xiaomi India nor its contract manufactures were including the amount of royalty paid by Xiaomi India in the assessable value of the goods imported by Xiaomi India and its contract manufacturers, which is in violation of Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Customs valuation (determination of value of imported goods) Rules 2007.
\"By not adding \u201croyalty and \u201clicence fee\u201d into the transaction value, Xiaomi India was evading Customs duty being the beneficial owner of such imported mobile phones, the parts and components thereof,\" the statement said.
The MI brand mobile phones manufactured by the contract manufacturers are sold exclusively to Xiaomi India, in terms of the contract agreement.
Evidence gathered during the investigations by the DRI indicated that neither Xiaomi India nor its contract manufactures were including the amount of royalty paid by Xiaomi India in the assessable value of the goods imported by Xiaomi India and its contract manufacturers, which is in violation of Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Customs valuation (determination of value of imported goods) Rules 2007.
\"By not adding \u201croyalty and \u201clicence fee\u201d into the transaction value, Xiaomi India was evading Customs duty being the beneficial owner of such imported mobile phones, the parts and components thereof,\" the statement said.