X

我们使用cookie,以确保适合你的经验

我们用饼干和其他跟踪技术来提高你的浏览体验在我们的网站上,显示个性化内容和有针对性的广告,分析网站流量,并理解我们的观众来自哪里。你也可以阅读我们的隐私政策,我们使用cookie来确保你在我们的网站上的最好的体验。

选择我接受,或继续在网站上,你同意我们使用饼干和条款和条件。

得到应用
\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>The role of the proposed self-regulatory body (SRB) and the process of registration of games were among the key issues on which online gaming platforms and industry bodies have put forth their suggestions, while making their submissions to the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (Meity<\/a>) on the draft rules for the sector.

The gaming committee of the Internet<\/a> and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI<\/a>) has sought a common framework to be laid down by the government for the SRBs to follow so that uniform compliance and transparency can be ensured.

Last month, before the draft regulations were released, the IAMAI had said that it was best suited to become the self-regulator for the gaming sector. However, that proposal was shot down by the government earlier this month, when minister of state for electronics & information technology Rajeev Chandrasekhar<\/a> said industry bodies would not be permitted to become self-regulatory organisations and that SRBs had to be away from the dominance of gaming intermediaries.

In its submission to Meity, Delhi-based online gaming platform WinZo<\/a>, which offers real money games, has batted for multiple SRBs, or self-regulatory organisations, to coexist.

“Our concerns with the constitution of SROs (or SRBs) for regulation of the online gaming industry<\/a>, primarily stem from the inherent biases, conflicts of interest, between the SROs’ regulatory functions and its members, market operations, issuers, and shareholders, in as much as it was envisaged that an SRO, apart from having certain neutral members, would also necessarily consist of industry players,” WinZo said in its representations. “However, the draft rules allow for the possibility of multiple SROs and hence the initial apprehension has been allayed.”

For the proposed self-regulator, the IAMAI has pitched that at least one member be a retired judge of the Supreme Court or a high court, “since the SRB will perform an adjudicatory function”.

As per Meity’s proposal, an SRB would include a member each from the field of online gaming, sports, or entertainment; online gaming industry; the field of psychology, medicine or consumer education; and information and communication technology. It also suggested that the central government nominate a member with experience in public policy, public administration, law enforcement or public finance.

Mumbai-based Games24x7<\/a>, which operates RummyCircle and My11Circle platforms, has urged the government to have an oversight body with adjudicatory powers for the SRBs. “Such a mechanism will ensure a robust adjudication process for industry's smooth governance,” it said.

It has suggested that the existing grievance appellate committee formed under the IT intermediary rules be empowered to handle grievances raised by online gaming platforms till a separate appellate body is put in place.

Meity had released the draft amendments to the IT intermediary rules earlier this month to ensure online games are offered in conformity with Indian laws and users are safeguarded against potential harm.

It had initially given stakeholders time till January 19 to make their suggestions and comments, but later extended the deadline till January 25. In its draft rules, the government proposed a self-regulatory mechanism, mandatory verification of players and physical Indian address for online gaming companies.

The rules also propose that self-regulatory bodies be registered with the ministry. The SRBs will register games of online gaming intermediaries, which are their members and meet certain criteria. They will also resolve complaints through a grievance redressal mechanism.

Gurgaon-based startup industry body IndiaTech has suggested a three-tier dispute resolution framework instead of a two-tier structure as suggested in the draft rules. “An oversight body may be constituted by the self-regulatory body as Grievance Appellate Gaming Council, consisting of experts with relevant knowledge and experience of the online gaming industry,” it said.

Since the rules allow for one or more self-regulatory bodies, “there is a risk of forum shopping by the intermediaries”, IndiaTech said. “An oversight body can reduce or control the risk of forum shopping and can ensure that the powers and functions of self-regulatory bodies are not compromised,” it added.

In addition to the structure of the SRB, stakeholders have also sought changes to how registration of online games would be done with a self-regulator.

Games24x7 has suggested a two-step registration process. “SRBs can register online games in two steps: provisional registration and final registration. Based on the provisional registration, the operator can offer the game and provide data to the SRB so that it can run technical tests that may be required for game verification,” it said, adding that this is because an intermediary can provide real-world data only after running a game for a certain amount of time.

WinZo has raised concerns over the extent of powers given to the SRB for registration of an online game, including the determination that an online game is a game of skill.

“In our experience, such a pre-registration is highly likely to compromise the confidentiality of information required to be submitted for evaluation\/certification and lead to IP (intellectual property) leaks which is the single most important asset a game developer has that cannot be protected by a patent. Potential delays may also compromise the first-mover advantage,” WinZo cofounder Saumya Singh Rathore told ET.

The All India Gaming Federation, which represents a clutch of online gaming platforms, said in its submissions that companies should be allowed to do self-certification of new games on the basis of a given checklist of requirements, following which they can apply for registration after 90 days. This, the federation said, would give time to game developers to take the first mover advantage in any unique products they develop.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":97388987,"title":"U.S. House panel to vote next month on possible TikTok ban","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/u-s-house-panel-to-vote-next-month-on-possible-tiktok-ban\/97388987","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":97393155,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Gaming companies seek tweaks in draft rules in submissions","synopsis":"The gaming committee of the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) has sought a common framework to be laid down by the government for the SRBs to follow so that uniform compliance and transparency can be ensured.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/gaming-companies-seek-tweaks-in-draft-rules-in-submissions","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Pranav Mukul","author_link":"\/author\/479259077\/pranav-mukul","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479259077.cms?width=100&height=100&hostid=268","author_additional":false}],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETtech","artdate":"2023-01-28 11:44:17","lastupd":"2023-01-28 11:47:58","breadcrumbTags":["Gaming rules","Meity","Winzo","gaming industry","Games24x7","Rajeev Chandrasekhar","IAMAI","Law and Policy","internet"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/gaming-companies-seek-tweaks-in-draft-rules-in-submissions"}}" data-authors="[" pranav mukul"]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2023-01-28" data-index="article_1">

博彩公司寻求调整在提交的草案

互联网和移动游戏委员会协会印度(IAMAI)寻求一个共同的框架是由政府遵循这样的固体火箭助推器制服可以确保遵从性和透明度。

Pranav成员Mukul
  • 更新2023年1月28日,上午11点坚持
提出自我监管机构的作用(SRB)和注册游戏的过程的关键问题是在线游戏平台和行业团体提出他们的建议,而让他们提交的电子与信息技术(Meity)的草案。

博彩委员会互联网印度和移动协会(IAMAI)寻求一个共同的框架是由政府遵循的固体火箭助推器,这样可以保证统一的合规和透明度。

上个月,在条例草案公布之前,IAMAI曾经说过,这是最适合成为游戏行业的自动调节器。然而,建议政府本月早些时候被击落,当部长电子与信息技术拉杰夫钱德拉塞卡表示,行业组织不会被允许成为自律组织和主导地位必须远离我国出生性别比偏高的博彩中介。

广告
在其提交Meity,德里在线游戏平台WinZo提供真正的金钱游戏,拍了多个出生,或自律组织共存。

“我们对宪法的自律监管网上(或出生)的监管游戏产业,主要源于固有的偏见,之间的利益冲突,自律监管的监管职能及其成员,市场操作,发行人股东,在尽可能多的设想,“一个SRO”,除了在某些中立的成员,也必然由行业人士,表示”WinZo说。“然而,草案规定允许多个行为的可能性,因此最初的恐惧已经减轻。”

提出自动调节器,IAMAI搭,至少有一个成员是一个退休的法官的最高法院或高等法院,“因为国储局将执行一个adjudicatory功能”。

按照Meity的提议,SRB将包括一个成员分别来自在线游戏领域,体育,或娱乐;网络游戏产业;领域的心理学、医学或消费者教育;和信息和通信技术。它还指出,中央政府提名成员与公共政策的经验,公共行政、执法和公共财政。

孟买Games24x7运营RummyCircle和My11Circle平台,敦促政府有一个监督机构对srb adjudicatory权力。”这样的机制将确保一个健壮的审判过程行业的光滑的治理,”它说。

广告
它已经表明,现有的不满上诉委员会下成立中介规则是授权处理不满提出的在线游戏平台到单独的上诉机构到位。

Meity修正案草案公布了本月早些时候它中介规则,以确保在线游戏提供符合印度法律、用户维护对潜在危害。

它最初给利益相关者时间到1月19日让他们的建议和意见,但后来延长最后期限,直到1月25日。在其草案,政府提出了一个自我监管机制,强制验证为网络游戏公司印度球员和物理地址。

规则还提出,自我监管机构注册部。火箭推进器将注册游戏在线游戏的中介机构,其成员和符合一定标准。他们也将通过申诉修正机制解决投诉。

Gurgaon-based创业行业机构IndiaTech提出一个三层的争端解决框架,而不是两层结构的建议草案。“一个监督机构可以自我监管机构构成的申诉受理上诉的博彩委员会,由专家组成的网络游戏产业的相关知识和经验,”它说。

因为规则允许一个或更多的自我监管机构,”有一个风险论坛购物的中介机构”,IndiaTech说。“一个监督机构可以减少或控制论坛购物的风险,可以确保自律机构的职权不妥协,”它补充道。

除了SRB的结构,利益相关者也寻求更改注册在线游戏将如何完成一个自动调节器。

Games24x7建议注册一个两步的过程。“出生在两个步骤:注册在线游戏最后临时注册和登记。基于临时登记,运营商可以提供游戏和国储局提供数据,以便它可以运行游戏的技术测试,可能需要验证,”它补充说,这是因为一个中间人可以提供真实的数据只有在运行一定的时间的游戏。

WinZo引发了担忧的程度权力给国储局注册的在线游戏,包括在线游戏的决心是一个游戏的技能。

“根据我们的经验,这种预先登记极有可能妥协的保密信息需要提交评估/认证并导致IP(知识产权)泄漏是游戏开发者的最重要的资产,不能受到专利的保护。潜在的延迟也会妥协的先发优势,”辛格WinZo共同创始人环球游拉索尔教授告诉等。

全印度游戏联盟,代表的在线游戏平台,在其提交表示,公司应该被允许做自我认证的新游戏的基础上给定的要求,检查表后,他们可以申请登记后90天。联合会表示,这将给游戏开发者的时间先发优势在任何独特的产品开发。
  • 发表在2023年1月28日上午11:44坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

评论

现在评论 阅读评论(1)

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>The role of the proposed self-regulatory body (SRB) and the process of registration of games were among the key issues on which online gaming platforms and industry bodies have put forth their suggestions, while making their submissions to the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (Meity<\/a>) on the draft rules for the sector.

The gaming committee of the Internet<\/a> and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI<\/a>) has sought a common framework to be laid down by the government for the SRBs to follow so that uniform compliance and transparency can be ensured.

Last month, before the draft regulations were released, the IAMAI had said that it was best suited to become the self-regulator for the gaming sector. However, that proposal was shot down by the government earlier this month, when minister of state for electronics & information technology Rajeev Chandrasekhar<\/a> said industry bodies would not be permitted to become self-regulatory organisations and that SRBs had to be away from the dominance of gaming intermediaries.

In its submission to Meity, Delhi-based online gaming platform WinZo<\/a>, which offers real money games, has batted for multiple SRBs, or self-regulatory organisations, to coexist.

“Our concerns with the constitution of SROs (or SRBs) for regulation of the online gaming industry<\/a>, primarily stem from the inherent biases, conflicts of interest, between the SROs’ regulatory functions and its members, market operations, issuers, and shareholders, in as much as it was envisaged that an SRO, apart from having certain neutral members, would also necessarily consist of industry players,” WinZo said in its representations. “However, the draft rules allow for the possibility of multiple SROs and hence the initial apprehension has been allayed.”

For the proposed self-regulator, the IAMAI has pitched that at least one member be a retired judge of the Supreme Court or a high court, “since the SRB will perform an adjudicatory function”.

As per Meity’s proposal, an SRB would include a member each from the field of online gaming, sports, or entertainment; online gaming industry; the field of psychology, medicine or consumer education; and information and communication technology. It also suggested that the central government nominate a member with experience in public policy, public administration, law enforcement or public finance.

Mumbai-based Games24x7<\/a>, which operates RummyCircle and My11Circle platforms, has urged the government to have an oversight body with adjudicatory powers for the SRBs. “Such a mechanism will ensure a robust adjudication process for industry's smooth governance,” it said.

It has suggested that the existing grievance appellate committee formed under the IT intermediary rules be empowered to handle grievances raised by online gaming platforms till a separate appellate body is put in place.

Meity had released the draft amendments to the IT intermediary rules earlier this month to ensure online games are offered in conformity with Indian laws and users are safeguarded against potential harm.

It had initially given stakeholders time till January 19 to make their suggestions and comments, but later extended the deadline till January 25. In its draft rules, the government proposed a self-regulatory mechanism, mandatory verification of players and physical Indian address for online gaming companies.

The rules also propose that self-regulatory bodies be registered with the ministry. The SRBs will register games of online gaming intermediaries, which are their members and meet certain criteria. They will also resolve complaints through a grievance redressal mechanism.

Gurgaon-based startup industry body IndiaTech has suggested a three-tier dispute resolution framework instead of a two-tier structure as suggested in the draft rules. “An oversight body may be constituted by the self-regulatory body as Grievance Appellate Gaming Council, consisting of experts with relevant knowledge and experience of the online gaming industry,” it said.

Since the rules allow for one or more self-regulatory bodies, “there is a risk of forum shopping by the intermediaries”, IndiaTech said. “An oversight body can reduce or control the risk of forum shopping and can ensure that the powers and functions of self-regulatory bodies are not compromised,” it added.

In addition to the structure of the SRB, stakeholders have also sought changes to how registration of online games would be done with a self-regulator.

Games24x7 has suggested a two-step registration process. “SRBs can register online games in two steps: provisional registration and final registration. Based on the provisional registration, the operator can offer the game and provide data to the SRB so that it can run technical tests that may be required for game verification,” it said, adding that this is because an intermediary can provide real-world data only after running a game for a certain amount of time.

WinZo has raised concerns over the extent of powers given to the SRB for registration of an online game, including the determination that an online game is a game of skill.

“In our experience, such a pre-registration is highly likely to compromise the confidentiality of information required to be submitted for evaluation\/certification and lead to IP (intellectual property) leaks which is the single most important asset a game developer has that cannot be protected by a patent. Potential delays may also compromise the first-mover advantage,” WinZo cofounder Saumya Singh Rathore told ET.

The All India Gaming Federation, which represents a clutch of online gaming platforms, said in its submissions that companies should be allowed to do self-certification of new games on the basis of a given checklist of requirements, following which they can apply for registration after 90 days. This, the federation said, would give time to game developers to take the first mover advantage in any unique products they develop.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":97388987,"title":"U.S. House panel to vote next month on possible TikTok ban","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/u-s-house-panel-to-vote-next-month-on-possible-tiktok-ban\/97388987","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":97393155,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Gaming companies seek tweaks in draft rules in submissions","synopsis":"The gaming committee of the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) has sought a common framework to be laid down by the government for the SRBs to follow so that uniform compliance and transparency can be ensured.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/gaming-companies-seek-tweaks-in-draft-rules-in-submissions","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Pranav Mukul","author_link":"\/author\/479259077\/pranav-mukul","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479259077.cms?width=100&height=100&hostid=268","author_additional":false}],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETtech","artdate":"2023-01-28 11:44:17","lastupd":"2023-01-28 11:47:58","breadcrumbTags":["Gaming rules","Meity","Winzo","gaming industry","Games24x7","Rajeev Chandrasekhar","IAMAI","Law and Policy","internet"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/gaming-companies-seek-tweaks-in-draft-rules-in-submissions"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/gaming-companies-seek-tweaks-in-draft-rules-in-submissions/97393155">