![\"\"](\"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
Firstly, there are two glowing earrings in the image hanging in the Mauritshuis<\/a> museum in the Dutch city of The Hague. And aren't those freckles on her face actually... a slightly inhuman shade of red?
That's because the work -- one of several fan recreations replacing the 1665 original while it's on loan for a huge Vermeer show at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum -- was made using artificial intelligence<\/a> (AI).
Its presence has sparked a fierce debate, with questions over whether it belongs in the hallowed halls of the Mauritshuis -- and whether it should be classed as art at all.
\"It's controversial, so people are for it or against it,\" Mauritshuis press officer Boris de Munnick told AFP.
\"The people who selected this, they liked it, they knew that it was AI, but we liked the creation. So we chose it, and we hung it.\"
'Incredible insult':<\/strong> Berlin-based digital creator Julian van Dieken submitted the image after the Mauritshuis asked people to send in their versions of the famous painting for an installation called \"My Girl with a Pearl\".
Van Dieken said he had used the AI tool Midjourney -- which can generate complex pictures on the basis of a prompt, using millions of images from the internet<\/a> -- and Photoshop.
The Mauritshuis then chose it as one of five images out of 3,482 submitted by fans that would be printed and physically hung in the room where \"Girl with a Pearl Earring\" is normally housed.
\"It's surreal to see it in a museum,\" van Dieken wrote on Instagram.
The budding artists ranged in age from three to 94, depicting the \"Girl\" in diverse styles ranging from a puppet to a dinosaur and a piece of fruit.
But the decision to choose an AI-generated image sparked a backlash.
One artist said on the Instagram feed for the Mauritshuis exhibition that it was a \"shame and an incredible insult\", and dozens of others piled in.
A common complaint was that AI tools can breach the copyright of other artists by using their works as the base for artificially generated images.
Artist Eva Toorenent, of the European Guild for Artificial Intelligence Regulation, criticised what she called the \"unethical technology\".
\"Without the work of human artists, this program could not generate works at all,\" she was quoted as saying by the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant.
'What is art?':<\/strong> \"It's such a difficult question -- what is art, and what is not art?\" said the Mauritshuis's de Munnick.
But he insisted that the museum, whose collection boasts three Vermeers and nearly a dozen Rembrandts<\/a>, had not deliberately set out to make an artistic statement on AI.
\"Our opinion is, we think it's a nice picture, we think it's a creative process,\" he said. \"We're not the museum to discuss if AI belongs in an art museum.\"
He admitted though that \"up close, you see that the freckles are a little spooky.\"
Visitors to the Mauritshuis were equally divided, he added.
\"Younger people tend to say, it's artificial intelligence, what's new. Elderly people sometimes say we like the more traditional paintings.\"
The Mauritshuis was looking forward to the return of the real \"Girl\" in April, he added. The painting's fame has increased in recent years due to a 1999 novel by US author Tracy Chevalier and an ensuing Hollywood film.
\"Well, she is beautiful in the (Rijksmuseum) exhibition... But we will be very happy when she is at home.\"
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":98542782,"title":"Airtel's ARPU to rise 3% to Rs 199, post jump in base prepaid rates: CLSA","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/airtels-arpu-to-rise-3-to-rs-199-post-jump-in-base-prepaid-rates-clsa\/98542782","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":98543707,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Girl with AI earrings sparks Dutch art controversy","synopsis":"Firstly, there are two glowing earrings in the image hanging in the Mauritshuis museum in the Dutch city of The Hague. And aren't those freckles on her face actually... a slightly inhuman shade of red?","titleseo":"telecomnews\/girl-with-ai-earrings-sparks-dutch-art-controversy","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":296,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":961000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"AFP","artdate":"2023-03-10 16:54:46","lastupd":"2023-03-10 17:04:41","breadcrumbTags":["artificial intelligence","AI Art","mauritshuis","rembrandts","internet","AI earrings","Girl with a Pearl Earring","Johannes Vermeer"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/girl-with-ai-earrings-sparks-dutch-art-controversy"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2023-03-10" data-index="article_1">
读到
首先,有两个图片挂在发光的耳环毛利斯博物馆在荷兰海牙的城市。实际上并不是那些脸上雀斑……有点不人道的红色的吗?
这是因为几个风扇的工作——一个娱乐取代1665年的原始虽然租借一个巨大的维米尔在阿姆斯特丹博物馆——使用人工智能(AI)。
它的存在引发了一场激烈的争论,质疑它是否属于莫瑞泰斯的神圣殿堂,和是否应该归入艺术。
“这是有争议的,所以人还是反对它,“毛利斯新闻官鲍里斯·德Munnick告诉法新社。
“选择的人,他们喜欢它,他们知道这是人工智能,但我们喜欢创造。所以我们选择了它,挂了。”
“难以置信的侮辱”:柏林数字创造者朱利安·莫瑞泰斯范Dieken提交后的图像要求人们发送的版本安装的名画被称为“我的珍珠”。
范Dieken说他已经使用了人工智能工具Midjourney——可以产生复杂的图片的基础上一个提示,使用从数以百万计的图像互联网——和Photoshop。
莫瑞泰斯然后选择它作为五个图片提交的3482球迷将印刷和身体挂在房间,”《戴珍珠耳环的少女》“通常居住。
“这是超现实主义在博物馆看到它,”van Dieken在Instagram写道。
崭露头角的艺术家的年龄跨度从三到94年,描绘了“女孩”在不同风格从一个傀儡一只恐龙和一片水果。
但决定选择一个AI-generated形象引发了反弹。
一位艺术家表示Instagram饲料莫瑞泰斯展览,这是一个“耻辱和令人难以置信的侮辱”,和许多其他人。
一个常见的抱怨是,人工智能工具可以违反版权的其他艺术家通过使用他们的作品作为基地人工生成的图像。
艺术家伊娃Toorenent,人工智能监管,欧洲协会的批评她所谓的“不道德的技术”。
“没有人类的艺术家的作品,这个项目不能产生作品,”她援引荷兰报纸De Volkskrant。乐动扑克
“什么是艺术?”:“这是这样一个困难的问题——什么是艺术,不是艺术是什么?”莫瑞泰斯的德Munnick说。
但他坚持认为,博物馆,收藏有三个形象和将近一打伦勃朗,没有有意的艺术声明AI。
“我们的观点是,我们认为这是一个很好的照片,我们认为这是一个创造性的过程,”他说。“我们不是讨论如果AI属于一个艺术博物馆博物馆。”
他虽然承认“近距离,你看到,雀斑是有点怪异。”
游客莫瑞泰斯也同样分裂,他补充说。
“年轻人倾向于说,人工智能,什么是新的。老年人有时说,我们喜欢传统绘画”。
莫瑞泰斯皇家美术馆期待4月的回归真正的“女孩”,他补充道。这幅画的名气增加了近年来由于1999年的小说《美国作家崔西·雪佛兰和随后的好莱坞电影。
“嗯,她是美丽的(国家)展览……但是我们将会很高兴当她在家。”
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动