独家
政府或跳过27.5-28.5 GHz频段拍卖
一位知情人士向ETTelecom表示:“这(非拍卖)将使优质自然资源闲置，可能会给财政部造成损失，尽管监管机构建议在共享的基础上使用它，并提供充分的保护。”乐动娱乐招聘
消息人士透露，该部门正在将一份说明转移到数字通信委员会(DCC)将在6月即将到来的下一代(5G)无线电波大型拍卖中排除毫米波(27.5-28.5 GHz)频段。
一位知情人士向ETTelecom表示:“这(非拍卖)将使优质自然资源闲置，可能会给财政部造成损失，尽管监管机构建议在共享的基础上使用它，并提供充分的保护。”乐动娱乐招聘
在最近给该部门的一封“措辞强硬的信”中，由Bharti的OneWeb支持的印度空间协会(ISpA)“试图驳回行业监管机构的观点”，并表示政府不应该将毫米波无线电波指定给地面网络运营商用于5G服务。
总部位于德里的卫星通信或Satcom组织敦促交通部不要为下一代服务确定28 GHz频段——这是一个有争议的观点，使空间宽带参与者与电信服务提供商对立，并且在很大程度上违背了联合国领导的机构定义的全球最佳实践。
对交通部的查询没有得到任何回应。
本月初，印度电信监管局(Trai)建议将毫米波波段(24.25 GHz至28.5 GHz)拍卖，并建议基本价格为每单位7000万卢比。
然而，该监管机构认为，其建议地面网络运营商和卫星服务提供商在27.5- 28.5 GHz的毫米波频段共存，对“最佳利用电波”至关重要。
此举遭到了太空服务提供商的反对。
卫星通信公司敦促交通部不要为5G服务提供28 GHz频段
印度空间协会(ISpA)在给电信部(DoT)秘书K Rajaraman的一封信中，敦促他驳回行业监管机构关于28 GHz频段卫星和5G移动服务共存的呼吁。
“国际移动通信(IMT)和卫星频段可以共存。为了有效利用频谱，共存是必须的。”乐动娱乐招聘
铁道部官员表示，不应阻止5G运营商使用(27.5 - 28.5 GHz，或28 GHz频段)频段，国家不能浪费频谱，只将其分配给能够满足共存安排的卫星行业。
监管机构已经为卫星行业提供了足够的保护，建议运营商不得在距离卫星通信服务所需的卫星地面站网关两公里半径的范围内建立基站，以避免干扰。
Trai的美国同行，联邦通信委员会(FCC)还建议在5G和卫星地面站之间保持保护距离的两个组共存。
![\"Government](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/figure>NEW DELHI: The Department of Telecommunications<\/a> (DoT) is likely to avoid the coveted 27.5-28.5 GHz spectrum frequency range to be brought under the hammer making the natural resource unutilised following non-readiness of space broadband players.The sources revealed that the department is moving a note to the Digital Communications Commission<\/a> (DCC) to exclude the mmWave (27.5-28.5 GHz) band in the upcoming mega auction for next generation (5G) airwaves in June.
\"This (non-auction) will leave the premium natural resource to go idle and may be a loss to the exchequer despite the regulator's recommendation to use it on a sharing basis with adequate protection,\" a person familiar with the matter told ETTelecom.
<\/div><\/div>Separately, a senior official confirmed the move.
In a recent \"strongly-worded letter\" to the department, Indian Space Association (ISpA) backed by Bharti's OneWeb \"sought to dismiss the sector regulator's views\" and said that the government should not earmark the mmwave radiowaves to terrestrial network operators for 5G services.
The Delhi-based satellite communication or Satcom group urges DoT against identifying 28 GHz band for next generation services -- a controversial view that pitted space broadband players against telecom service providers, and is largely against the global best practice, as defined by the UN-led body.
Query to DoT did not elicit any response.
Early this month, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (Trai) has recommended the mmWave band \u2013 24.25 GHz to 28.5 GHz \u2013 be put to auction, and has recommended a base price of Rs 7 crore a unit.
The watchdog, however, believes that its suggestion of coexistence between terrestrial network operators and satellite service providers in the millimetre wave (mmWave) band of 27.5- 28.5 GHz is essential for the \"optimum use of airwaves.\"
The move was opposed by space service providers.
In a recent \"strongly-worded letter\" to the department, Indian Space Association (ISpA) backed by Bharti's OneWeb \"sought to dismiss the sector regulator's views\" and said that the government should not earmark the mmwave radiowaves to terrestrial network operators for 5G services.
The Delhi-based satellite communication or Satcom group urges DoT against identifying 28 GHz band for next generation services -- a controversial view that pitted space broadband players against telecom service providers, and is largely against the global best practice, as defined by the UN-led body.
Query to DoT did not elicit any response.
Early this month, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (Trai) has recommended the mmWave band \u2013 24.25 GHz to 28.5 GHz \u2013 be put to auction, and has recommended a base price of Rs 7 crore a unit.
The watchdog, however, believes that its suggestion of coexistence between terrestrial network operators and satellite service providers in the millimetre wave (mmWave) band of 27.5- 28.5 GHz is essential for the \"optimum use of airwaves.\"
The move was opposed by space service providers.