![\"\"](\"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
After hearing the arguments of all the accused persons and the probe agencies, a single judge bench of the high court presided over by Justice Brijesh Sethi reserved its order.
During the course of hearing, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Sanjay Jain<\/a>, representing the probe agencies, submitted that substantial public time has already been consumed and since Justice Sethi, who is hearing the matter currently, is all set to demit office in November, the matter should be heard immediately.
\"A judge can always decide how much time is required to hear a matter... If genuine efforts are made and assistance is rendered, it's possible to take this matter to a logical conclusion,\" said the ASG while responding to the submissions made by the counsels of the accused persons, who had opposed the petition for early hearing saying that they won't get required time to put forth their stand if the matter is hurried.
\"It's my duty to unravel the truth,\" said Sethi while hearing the submissions made by Jain and, adding that in his last four years at the high court, he had never stopped a counsel from arguing.
Jain refuted the submissions made by the counsel for the accused persons that the matter has its records running into many pages and required assistance from the accused parties would not be possible given the pandemic situation.
Earlier on Monday, the counsel for the accused persons had opposed the plea moved by the agencies. Advocate Manu Sharma appearing for former Telecom Minister A. Raja argued that there was no cause to grant an out-of-turn, urgent hearing to the appeals moved by the CBI and the ED amid the Covid-19 pandemic.
Advocates Vijay Aggarwal, Mudit Jain and Ashul Agarwal, representing Shahid Balwa and several others, too opposed the said petition and said the CBI did not explain as to why the appeal was filed and why it should be given precedence\/preference over other appeals.
The probe agencies, both CBI and ED, moved the court in March 2018 challenging a trial court's order which had acquitted all the accused in the 2G spectrum case.
In 2017, a special CBI court acquitted all the 18 accused persons, including Raja and K. Kanimozhi, in the 2G spectrum allocation case.
The scam came to light almost seven years ago when the Comptroller and Auditor General in a report held then Telecom Minister Raja responsible for causing the state exchequer a loss of Rs 1,76,379 crore by allocating 2G spectrum licences at throwaway prices.
However, the trial court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":78258585,"title":"Realme targets up to 25 pc share of India's smartphone sales during festive season","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/realme-targets-up-to-25-pc-share-of-indias-smartphone-sales-during-festive-season\/78258585","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"seoschemas":false,"msid":78258665,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"HC reserves order on plea seeking early hearing in 2G case","synopsis":"The Delhi High Court on Tuesday reserved its order on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seeking early hearing of its leave to appeal application against the acquittal of the accused persons in the 2G spectrum case.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/hc-reserves-order-on-plea-seeking-early-hearing-in-2g-case","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":152,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":606000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"IANS","artdate":"2020-09-22 19:29:25","lastupd":"2020-09-22 19:32:57","breadcrumbTags":["2G spectrum case","delhi high court","enforcement directorate","Sanjay Jain","2G case","CBI","policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/hc-reserves-order-on-plea-seeking-early-hearing-in-2g-case"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2020-09-22" data-index="article_1">
- Telecom乐动扑克News
- 2分钟阅读
HC储备订单请求寻找早期听力在2 g的情况下
德里高等法院周二保留其订单提交的请愿书执法局(ED)和中央调查局(CBI)寻求早期听力的离开上诉程序对被告无罪释放的人在2 g频谱的情况下。
读到
听完所有被告个人的观点和调查机构,一个高等法院的法官法官主持正义Brijesh Sethi保留订单。
在听力的过程中,额外的总检察长(ASG)Sanjay Jain代表调查机构提交,已经消耗了大量的公共时间因为正义塞提,谁听到这个问题目前,都将在11月辞职办公室,此事应该立即被听到。
“法官可以决定需要多少时间听问题……如果真正努力和援助呈现,可以把这事一个合乎逻辑的结论,”说,这种应对提交时由被告的建议人,曾反对申请早听到说他们不会需要时间来提出他们的站如果此事是匆忙的。
“这是我的义务揭开真相,“说Sethi虽然听证会提交由耆那教徒,并补充说在他最后四年高等法院,他从未停止争论的法律顾问。
Jain驳斥了提交由被告律师个人的物质有其记录遇到的许多页面和需要援助指责党不可能考虑到大流行情况。
周一早些时候,被告律师的人反对请求感动了机构。提倡马努Sharma出现a前电信部长拉贾认为,没有理由格兰特不合时宜地,紧急听证会吸引感动CBI和艾德在Covid-19大流行。
提倡Vijay Aggarwal Mudit Jain和Ashul Agarwal,代表Shahid Balwa和其他几个人也反对说,请愿书,说英国工业联合会不解释为什么提起上诉,为什么它应该得到优先/偏好其他上诉。
调查机构,CBI和ED,最高法院在2018年3月挑战法院的审判秩序曾被指责在2 g频谱的情况下。
在2017年,一个特别CBI法庭无罪释放所有18指责人,包括拉贾和k . Kanimozhi在2 g频谱分配的情况。
骗局曝光几乎七年前当审计和审计一般在一份报告中电信部长拉贾举行负责导致国家财政大臣损失1 Rs 76379卢比的分配以一次性的价格2 g频谱牌照。
然而,审判法院发现原告未能证明这些指控。
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动