X

我们使用cookie,以确保适合你的经验

我们用饼干和其他跟踪技术来提高你的浏览体验在我们的网站上,显示个性化内容和有针对性的广告,分析网站流量,并理解我们的观众来自哪里。你也可以阅读我们的隐私政策,我们使用cookie来确保你在我们的网站上的最好的体验。

选择我接受,或继续在网站上,你同意我们使用饼干和条款和条件。

得到应用
\"\"NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court today refused to interfere in the Aircel-Maxis case as the matter is pending before a special court set up by the Supreme Court.
\n
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal declined to entertain a PIL seeking directions to the CBI to move the trial court for \"attachment and forfeiture of shares and all the assets of Aircel<\/a> Ltd\", as held by Maxis<\/a> and its subsidiaries.
\n
\nIt said even if the allegations made in the petition were assumed to have any substance, appropriate steps need to be taken before the special court.
\n
The judges said that if the directions sought in the PIL by a society were granted then it would not only interfere with the proceedings before the trial court, but would also defeat the purpose of the apex court's order by which the special court was set up to deal with the 2G spectrum scam<\/a> cases.
\n
\n\"Hence, we are not inclined to entertain this petition and the same is dismissed accordingly,\" the bench said.
\n
\nThe petitioner, Society for Consumers and Investors Protection (SCIP), had alleged that the CBI was neither implementing the law nor going after some of the accused in the case.
\n
\nSCIP had sought directions to the CBI to make several subsidiary companies of Maxis Communications as accused in the Aircel-Maxis case, which arose out of the 2G spectrum allocation scam.
\n
The society had also sought directions to the Department of Telecommunications, SEBI, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Foreign Investment Promotion Board to set aside the approvals granted to Reliance Communications Ltd<\/a> for a merger of its wireless business with that of Aircel.
\n
It had also asked for setting aside of the approvals granted to Bharti Airtel<\/a> for acquisition of 4G spectrum of Aircel.
\n
\nThe society had urged the court to direct the authorities to not grant any further permission for transfer of any spectrum or shares held by Aircel or for change of its management or shareholding pattern till all accused in the case submit themselves before the special CBI court.
\n
\nThe petition had also demanded a probe by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in respect of the shares, all other valuable assets of Aircel and the property obtained as a result of the Aircel-Maxis deal.
\n
It had alleged that \"the accused persons are in the process of liquidating their holdings in Aircel Ltd and its subsidiaries by merging the same with Reliance Communications Ltd<\/a> and selling its assets to Bharti Airtel<\/a> and running away\". \n<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":57885846,"title":"ET GBS 2017: Modi govt targets 25 billion digital transactions in next financial year","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/et-gbs-2017-modi-govt-targets-25-billion-digital-transactions-in-next-financial-year\/57885846","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":57885923,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"High Court refuses to interfere in Aircel-Maxis case","synopsis":"A bench of CJ G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal declined to entertain a PIL seeking directions to the CBI to move the trial court for \"attachment and forfeiture of shares and all the assets of Aircel Ltd\".","titleseo":"telecomnews\/high-court-refuses-to-interfere-in-aircel-maxis-case","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"PTI","artdate":"2017-03-29 09:27:35","lastupd":"2017-03-29 09:28:52","breadcrumbTags":["Airtel","industry","Bharti Airtel","Aircel","2G Spectrum scam","Maxis","Reliance Communications Ltd"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/high-court-refuses-to-interfere-in-aircel-maxis-case"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2017-03-29" data-index="article_1">

高等法院拒绝干涉Aircel-Maxis情况

长椅上的CJ G罗西尼和正义Sangita Dhingra Sehgal拒绝接受公益诉讼寻求方向CBI将审判法院“依恋和没收的股票Aircel有限公司”的资产。

  • 更新2017年3月29日09:28点坚持
新德里:德里高等法院今天拒绝干涉Aircel-Maxis案件悬而未决的事特别法庭之前设立的最高法院。

长椅上的首席大法官G罗西尼和正义Sangita Dhingra Sehgal拒绝接受公益诉讼寻求方向CBI将审判法院“依恋和没收的股票和所有的资产Aircel有限公司”了模拟人生和它的子公司。

它说即使这些指控的请愿书被认为有任何物质,需要采取适当措施在特别法庭之前。

法官说,如果由一个社会公益诉讼的方向寻求得到它不仅会干扰审判法庭前的程序,但也失败的目的的顶端法院的命令成立特别法庭处理2 g频谱骗局用例。

“因此,我们不倾向于娱乐这个请愿书,也是被因此,”法官说。

请愿者、社会保护消费者和投资者(SCIP)曾声称,英国工业联合会既不实施法律也不追求一些指责。

SCIP寻求方向CBI让几家附属公司Maxis通信Aircel-Maxis指责的情况下,出现了2 g频谱分配的骗局。

社会也寻求方向电信部,印度证券交易委员会、电信监管机构的印度和外国投资促进委员会留出批准授予信实电信有限公司合并与Aircel无线业务。

它还要求留出的批准Bharti AirtelAircel收购4 g频谱。

社会已经敦促法院直接当局不准许任何进一步的光谱或持有的股份转让Aircel或改变其管理或股权模式直到所有指控提交自己在特殊CBI法院。

请愿书还要求调查的执法局(ED)预防洗钱法案(PMLA)的股票,Aircel所有其他有价值的资产和财产取得的结果Aircel-Maxis交易。

它声称“被告人清算的过程中他们在Aircel有限公司及其子公司通过合并相同的信实电信有限公司Bharti和出售其资产附近的旅馆和逃跑”。
  • 发布于2017年3月29日上午09:27坚持

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

评论

现在评论 阅读评论(1)
\"\"NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court today refused to interfere in the Aircel-Maxis case as the matter is pending before a special court set up by the Supreme Court.
\n
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal declined to entertain a PIL seeking directions to the CBI to move the trial court for \"attachment and forfeiture of shares and all the assets of Aircel<\/a> Ltd\", as held by Maxis<\/a> and its subsidiaries.
\n
\nIt said even if the allegations made in the petition were assumed to have any substance, appropriate steps need to be taken before the special court.
\n
The judges said that if the directions sought in the PIL by a society were granted then it would not only interfere with the proceedings before the trial court, but would also defeat the purpose of the apex court's order by which the special court was set up to deal with the 2G spectrum scam<\/a> cases.
\n
\n\"Hence, we are not inclined to entertain this petition and the same is dismissed accordingly,\" the bench said.
\n
\nThe petitioner, Society for Consumers and Investors Protection (SCIP), had alleged that the CBI was neither implementing the law nor going after some of the accused in the case.
\n
\nSCIP had sought directions to the CBI to make several subsidiary companies of Maxis Communications as accused in the Aircel-Maxis case, which arose out of the 2G spectrum allocation scam.
\n
The society had also sought directions to the Department of Telecommunications, SEBI, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Foreign Investment Promotion Board to set aside the approvals granted to Reliance Communications Ltd<\/a> for a merger of its wireless business with that of Aircel.
\n
It had also asked for setting aside of the approvals granted to Bharti Airtel<\/a> for acquisition of 4G spectrum of Aircel.
\n
\nThe society had urged the court to direct the authorities to not grant any further permission for transfer of any spectrum or shares held by Aircel or for change of its management or shareholding pattern till all accused in the case submit themselves before the special CBI court.
\n
\nThe petition had also demanded a probe by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in respect of the shares, all other valuable assets of Aircel and the property obtained as a result of the Aircel-Maxis deal.
\n
It had alleged that \"the accused persons are in the process of liquidating their holdings in Aircel Ltd and its subsidiaries by merging the same with Reliance Communications Ltd<\/a> and selling its assets to Bharti Airtel<\/a> and running away\". \n<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":57885846,"title":"ET GBS 2017: Modi govt targets 25 billion digital transactions in next financial year","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/et-gbs-2017-modi-govt-targets-25-billion-digital-transactions-in-next-financial-year\/57885846","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":57885923,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"High Court refuses to interfere in Aircel-Maxis case","synopsis":"A bench of CJ G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal declined to entertain a PIL seeking directions to the CBI to move the trial court for \"attachment and forfeiture of shares and all the assets of Aircel Ltd\".","titleseo":"telecomnews\/high-court-refuses-to-interfere-in-aircel-maxis-case","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"PTI","artdate":"2017-03-29 09:27:35","lastupd":"2017-03-29 09:28:52","breadcrumbTags":["Airtel","industry","Bharti Airtel","Aircel","2G Spectrum scam","Maxis","Reliance Communications Ltd"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/high-court-refuses-to-interfere-in-aircel-maxis-case"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/high-court-refuses-to-interfere-in-aircel-maxis-case/57885923">