独家
华为印度派遣大量父母尽管收入下降,税收部门说
华为是中国公司在印度受到严格审查的活动。智能手机制造商Vivo和小米等公司和一些实体与他们也在印度调查人员的镜头,包括调查洗钱的执法局。
新德里:所得税部门指责印度单位的中国科技公司华为遣返大量的父母以股息的形式,减少其应纳税所得额。
声称在声明的收入差异华为电信印度至少两年金融部门表示,该公司已被遣返750卢比”甚至当其收入大幅减少”。
税务部门会冻结在2月份公司的银行账户,之后进行搜索操作的前提和指控其逃税。德里高等法院在附件4月账户的华为的请求,并要求部门的响应。部门详细的对该公司的指控在其响应提交本周早些时候,这等。
华为曾否认有过任何不当行为,并声称在其法院请愿,附件的账户,没有给予任何通知,已影响到其业务。
在其证词证明附件,税务部门将华为的请愿书描述为“一个策略提高了无聊的理由来阻碍部门程序,避免间接支付的税”。国务院还声称它拥有对该公司“有罪的证据材料”。
华为是中国公司在印度受到严格审查的活动。公司智能手机制造商体内和小米和一些实体与他们也在印度调查人员的镜头,包括探针的执法局洗钱。
产生的税务部门表示,华为单位没有账户“至今”的书籍,这使得“无法确定收入的真实性声明的公司”。
相反,它只是提供了一个转储”事务级别的细节从ERP中下载会计系统”,“不能说公司的账户”的书。即使这些不符合的最终财务公司2016 - 17和2017 - 18,它指控。
商务部称华为印度没有给它访问电子邮件杨毅,首席财务官转移定价问题的决策权。必须检查通信了解金融交易的全部进口和背后的原因,它说。但请求被拒绝在地面上,电子邮件可以数据与该公司无关,它说。
证词说等关键财务销售/采购和库存的注册提交后2月份部门进行搜索操作。
同时,努力让“有意义的细节”账户从各种书籍的关键人员被公司“石头围墙”“下设计阻止合法调查”,它说。相关细节的高管告诉官员寻求需要时间“六周”,它补充说。
证词说事务数据的转储提供包括“数百万行项目/交易没有被隔离成不同的分类帐和组”,并不能作为账户的书。
部门也提交了,“这不是争议的书籍的账户,华为印度事务级别保持在印度和不仅仅是数据维护ERP在中国的服务器由该公司声称足以确定规定的账户”的书。然而,它援引公司法,说,“备用电子帐簿维护的模式,包括在印度以外的地方,需要保存在服务器物理位置在印度”。部门进一步表示,直到6月的第一个星期,该公司没有明确具体的物理服务器在印度这样的位置。
”的提交的细节不符合公司并不免除它的搜索过程中,“证词说。
今年4月,法院在附件的银行账户的公司保持100卢比一个定期存款帐户。
声称在声明的收入差异华为电信印度至少两年金融部门表示,该公司已被遣返750卢比”甚至当其收入大幅减少”。
税务部门会冻结在2月份公司的银行账户,之后进行搜索操作的前提和指控其逃税。德里高等法院在附件4月账户的华为的请求,并要求部门的响应。部门详细的对该公司的指控在其响应提交本周早些时候,这等。
在其证词证明附件,税务部门将华为的请愿书描述为“一个策略提高了无聊的理由来阻碍部门程序,避免间接支付的税”。国务院还声称它拥有对该公司“有罪的证据材料”。
华为是中国公司在印度受到严格审查的活动。公司智能手机制造商体内和小米和一些实体与他们也在印度调查人员的镜头,包括探针的执法局洗钱。
产生的税务部门表示,华为单位没有账户“至今”的书籍,这使得“无法确定收入的真实性声明的公司”。
相反,它只是提供了一个转储”事务级别的细节从ERP中下载会计系统”,“不能说公司的账户”的书。即使这些不符合的最终财务公司2016 - 17和2017 - 18,它指控。
证词说等关键财务销售/采购和库存的注册提交后2月份部门进行搜索操作。
同时,努力让“有意义的细节”账户从各种书籍的关键人员被公司“石头围墙”“下设计阻止合法调查”,它说。相关细节的高管告诉官员寻求需要时间“六周”,它补充说。
证词说事务数据的转储提供包括“数百万行项目/交易没有被隔离成不同的分类帐和组”,并不能作为账户的书。
华为创始人问员工给的想法如何提高销售额下降
华为创始人任正非员工写了一份备忘录,称他们提供关于公司未来的方向,报告中国早报。
部门也提交了,“这不是争议的书籍的账户,华为印度事务级别保持在印度和不仅仅是数据维护ERP在中国的服务器由该公司声称足以确定规定的账户”的书。然而,它援引公司法,说,“备用电子帐簿维护的模式,包括在印度以外的地方,需要保存在服务器物理位置在印度”。部门进一步表示,直到6月的第一个星期,该公司没有明确具体的物理服务器在印度这样的位置。
”的提交的细节不符合公司并不免除它的搜索过程中,“证词说。
今年4月,法院在附件的银行账户的公司保持100卢比一个定期存款帐户。
New Delhi: The Income Tax Department has accused an Indian unit of Chinese technology company Huawei<\/a> of repatriating large amounts to the parent in the form of dividends, reducing its taxable income here.
Claiming discrepancies in the income declared by Huawei Telecommunications India<\/a> for at least two financial years, the department said the company had repatriated Rs 750 crore \u201ceven when its revenue was reducing drastically\u201d.
The tax department had frozen the bank accounts of the company in February, after conducting a search operation in its premises and accusing it of tax evasion. The Delhi High Court in April stayed the attachment of the accounts on Huawei\u2019s plea and sought the department\u2019s response. The department detailed the charges against the company in its response filed earlier this week, which ET has seen.
Claiming discrepancies in the income declared by Huawei Telecommunications India<\/a> for at least two financial years, the department said the company had repatriated Rs 750 crore \u201ceven when its revenue was reducing drastically\u201d.
The tax department had frozen the bank accounts of the company in February, after conducting a search operation in its premises and accusing it of tax evasion. The Delhi High Court in April stayed the attachment of the accounts on Huawei\u2019s plea and sought the department\u2019s response. The department detailed the charges against the company in its response filed earlier this week, which ET has seen.
<\/div><\/div>Huawei had denied any wrongdoing and claimed in its petition to the court that the attachment of the accounts, without giving any notice, had affected its business.
![\"Huawei](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/figure>
In its affidavit justifying the attachment, the tax department described Huawei\u2019s petition as \u201ca ploy raised on frivolous grounds just to obstruct departmental proceedings and to avoid consequential payment of taxes\u201d. The department also claimed it had in possession \u201cincriminating material\u201d against the company.
Huawei is one of the Chinese companies whose activities in India are under strict scrutiny. Companies like smartphone manufacturers Vivo<\/a> and Xiaomi<\/a> and some entities linked to them are also under the lens of Indian investigators including the Enforcement Directorate that probes money laundering<\/a>.
The tax department said the Huawei unit had not produced its books of accounts \u201ctill date\u201d, making it \u201cimpossible to ascertain the veracity of the income declared by the company\u201d.
Instead, it merely provided a dump of \u201ctransaction level details as downloaded from their ERP accounting system\u201d which \u201ccannot be said to be the books of accounts of the company\u201d. Even these didn\u2019t tally with the final financials of the company for 2016-17 and 2017-18, it alleged.
<\/figure>In its affidavit justifying the attachment, the tax department described Huawei\u2019s petition as \u201ca ploy raised on frivolous grounds just to obstruct departmental proceedings and to avoid consequential payment of taxes\u201d. The department also claimed it had in possession \u201cincriminating material\u201d against the company.
Huawei is one of the Chinese companies whose activities in India are under strict scrutiny. Companies like smartphone manufacturers Vivo<\/a> and Xiaomi<\/a> and some entities linked to them are also under the lens of Indian investigators including the Enforcement Directorate that probes money laundering<\/a>.
The tax department said the Huawei unit had not produced its books of accounts \u201ctill date\u201d, making it \u201cimpossible to ascertain the veracity of the income declared by the company\u201d.
Instead, it merely provided a dump of \u201ctransaction level details as downloaded from their ERP accounting system\u201d which \u201ccannot be said to be the books of accounts of the company\u201d. Even these didn\u2019t tally with the final financials of the company for 2016-17 and 2017-18, it alleged.