Mumbai: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has upheld the tax-exempt status of the Tata Trusts<\/a> and allowed their appeals against a revenue department order seeking to re-examine their tax assessments.
The Mumbai bench of the ITAT rejected the income tax department’s claims that the trusts had violated laws related to charitable trusts by holding shares of Tata Sons<\/a>.
This is the tribunal’s second ruling in favour of the Tata Trusts – Sir Ratan Tata Trust<\/a>, Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and the JRD Tata Trust. The ruling was for the assessment year 2015-16. In December 2020, the tribunal ruled in favour of the Tata Trusts in an identical case for assessment year 2014-15.
“Since the revision order under Section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 2015-16 was passed on identical facts and circumstances prevailing for the year 2014-15 in all the three trusts... all the three appeals... shall apply mutatis mutandis to this assessment year also,” a two-member bench of the ITAT said in its order of March 8, which was made available on Monday. “The operative portion of the said order of the tribunal is not reproduced herein for the sake of brevity. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed.”
In its December 2020 order, the tribunal observed that “as long as the shares are part of the corpus, as on June 1, 1973, or the shares are received as an accretion to the shares being held to be part of the corpus, the provisions of Section 13(1)(c) will not come into play.”
Mumbai: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has upheld the tax-exempt status of the Tata Trusts<\/a> and allowed their appeals against a revenue department order seeking to re-examine their tax assessments.
The Mumbai bench of the ITAT rejected the income tax department’s claims that the trusts had violated laws related to charitable trusts by holding shares of Tata Sons<\/a>.
This is the tribunal’s second ruling in favour of the Tata Trusts – Sir Ratan Tata Trust<\/a>, Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and the JRD Tata Trust. The ruling was for the assessment year 2015-16. In December 2020, the tribunal ruled in favour of the Tata Trusts in an identical case for assessment year 2014-15.
“Since the revision order under Section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 2015-16 was passed on identical facts and circumstances prevailing for the year 2014-15 in all the three trusts... all the three appeals... shall apply mutatis mutandis to this assessment year also,” a two-member bench of the ITAT said in its order of March 8, which was made available on Monday. “The operative portion of the said order of the tribunal is not reproduced herein for the sake of brevity. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed.”
In its December 2020 order, the tribunal observed that “as long as the shares are part of the corpus, as on June 1, 1973, or the shares are received as an accretion to the shares being held to be part of the corpus, the provisions of Section 13(1)(c) will not come into play.”
The order was a win for Tata Trusts in its battle to retain tax-exempt status. The tribunal’s observations on share ownership are likely to influence a case where the trusts challenged the tax department’s cancellation of their registrations.
In 2016, the commissioner of income tax (exemption) (CIT-E) had threatened to upend the decades-old ownership of Tata Sons by the trusts by alleging that such shareholdings violated income tax laws.
As per the December 2020 ruling, the genesis of the dispute lay in the 2016 order by the CIT-E, which rejected the grant of tax exemption to Sir Ratan Tata Trust, Sir Dorabji Trust and the JRD Tata Trust by the assessing officer, calling it erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue and requiring revision. The matter pertained to the returns filed for AY14-15 (financial year 2013-14) by Sir Dorabji Tata Trust.
The Tata Trusts appealed to the tribunal, denying the claims of the CIT-E.
The Trusts denied that they had violated income tax laws by indulging in “prohibited modes of investment” – that is, ownership of Tata Sons shares. They pointed out that tax exemption had been granted in previous years and that all the shares held in FY13-14 were held by the trusts before June 1, 1973, and subsequent additions to the corpus were only through bonus shares. It further stated that all the shares were held by them as corpus and the dividend income from these shares was used by the Tata Trusts for its charitable objects.
According to Ashish K Singh, managing partner of law firm Capstone Legal, each assessment year is required to be considered separately.
“The reasoning given by ITAT is that since the revision order which was challenged has been decided in favour of Tata Trusts for the assessment year in 2014-15, similar order is required to be passed for the subsequent year as well as the facts are identical,” said Singh.
<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":81523351,"title":"Ransomware attack on Pimpri Chinchwad Smart City servers managed by Tech Mahindra","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/ransomware-attack-on-pimpri-chinchwad-smart-city-servers-managed-by-tech-mahindra\/81523351","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":81523393,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"In a second win, tax-exempt status of Tata Trusts upheld","synopsis":"The Mumbai bench of the ITAT rejected the income tax department\u2019s claims that the trusts had violated laws related to charitable trusts by holding shares of Tata Sons.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/in-a-second-win-tax-exempt-status-of-tata-trusts-upheld","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2021-03-16 08:45:54","lastupd":"2021-03-16 08:45:54","breadcrumbTags":["Tata Trusts","Tata Sons","Tata Trusts tax exemption","Sir Ratan Tata Trust","policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/in-a-second-win-tax-exempt-status-of-tata-trusts-upheld"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/in-a-second-win-tax-exempt-status-of-tata-trusts-upheld/81523393">