X

我们使用cookie,以确保适合你的经验

我们用饼干和其他跟踪技术来提高你的浏览体验在我们的网站上,显示个性化内容和有针对性的广告,分析网站流量,并理解我们的观众来自哪里。你也可以阅读我们的隐私政策,我们使用cookie来确保你在我们的网站上的最好的体验。

选择我接受,或继续在网站上,你同意我们使用饼干和条款和条件。

得到应用
\"<p>FILE
FILE - In this June 19, 2018, file photo, a router and internet switch are displayed. On Friday, Jan. 28, 2022, a federal appeals court upheld California’s net neutrality law, rejecting an attempt by telecommunications industry groups to prevent the state from enforcing it. (AP Photo\/Charles Krupa, File)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>A federal appeals court has upheld California's net neutrality law<\/a>, rejecting an attempt by telecommunications industry groups to prevent the state from enforcing it.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a previous ruling, which means the status quo stays and the state can continue to enforce the law. This means California can continue its ban on internet providers slowing down or blocking access to websites and applications that don't pay for premium service.

California's net neutrality<\/a> law was signed by former Gov. Jerry Brown<\/a> in 2018. That came after regulators during the Trump administration killed federal net neutrality rules designed to prevent AT&T<\/a>, Comcast<\/a>, Verizon<\/a> and other major internet providers from exploiting their dominance to favor certain services or apps over others.

In response, seven states and Puerto Rico enacted their own net neutrality policies. The most expansive effort of this sort was in California, which started enforcing the law last year, with potentially significant consequences for the rest of the U.S.

The Trump administration sued to block California's 2018 law, preventing it from taking effect for years, but the Biden administration has dropped that lawsuit.

On Friday, proponents of net neutrality cheered the court's decision, but called for federal net neutrality laws.

\"This win is significant because it offers protections to people in our most populous state and drives the national conversation forward,\" said Matt Wood, vice president of policy<\/a> and general counsel of consumer advocacy group Free Press, in a statement. \"Yet tremendous as it is, we still need the Biden FCC to reclaim its authority not just for nationwide open-internet rules, but for policies promoting affordable, resilient, just and reasonable internet connections for everyone.\"

Big telecom companies oppose the stricter regulation that comes with the net neutrality rules and have fought it fiercely in court. They say the regulations can undermine investment in broadband and introduce uncertainty about what were acceptable business practices.

They say they prefer a national approach to a state-by-state one, but the industry has fought prior federal net neutrality rules. But with a Senate divided 50-50 between the parties, legislation in Congress may not draw enough support to pass.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":89192288,"title":"No conflict of interest in Google deal, says Airtel CEO","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/no-conflict-of-interest-in-google-deal-says-airtel-ceo\/89192288","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":89192294,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"In blow to telecoms, California's net neutrality law upheld","synopsis":"The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a previous ruling, which means the status quo stays and the state can continue to enforce the law. This means California can continue its ban on internet providers slowing down or blocking access to websites and applications that don't pay for premium service.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/in-blow-to-telecoms-californias-net-neutrality-law-upheld","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":131,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":426000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"AP","artdate":"2022-01-29 07:41:18","lastupd":"2022-01-29 07:42:56","breadcrumbTags":["Net neutrality","telecom news","Policy","jerry brown","verizon","at&t","Net Neutrality law","Comcast"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/in-blow-to-telecoms-californias-net-neutrality-law-upheld"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2022-01-29" data-index="article_1">

加州打击电信网络中立的法律支持

第九巡回上诉法院维持先前的判决,这意味着保持现状和国家可以继续执行法律。这意味着加州可以继续禁止互联网提供商减慢或阻止访问网站和应用程序服务不支付溢价。

  • 更新2022年1月29日07:42点坚持
阅读: 100年行业专业人士
读者的形象读到100年行业专业人士
< p >文件——在这个6月19日,2018年,文件的照片,显示路由器和网络交换机。星期五,2022年1月28日,一个联邦上诉法院支持加州网络中立的法律,拒绝一个电信行业团体试图阻止国家执行它。(美联社照片/查尔斯•Krupa文件)< / p >
2018年文件——在今年6月19日,文件的照片,显示路由器和网络交换机。星期五,2022年1月28日,一个联邦上诉法院支持加州网络中立的法律,拒绝一个电信行业团体试图阻止国家执行它。(美联社照片/查尔斯•Krupa文件)
一个联邦上诉法院支持加州网络中立的法律,拒绝一个电信行业团体试图阻止国家执行它。

第九巡回上诉法院维持先前的判决,这意味着保持现状和国家可以继续执行法律。这意味着加州可以继续禁止互联网提供商减慢或阻止访问网站和应用程序服务不支付溢价。

广告
加州的网络中立法律是由前政府签署。杰里。布朗在2018年。后,监管机构在特朗普管理联邦网络中立规则旨在防止死亡美国电话电报公司(AT&T),康卡斯特公司,威瑞森和其他主要互联网提供商利用他们的优势有利于某些服务或应用程序对他人。

作为回应,7个州和波多黎各制定自己的网络中立政策。最广阔的这种努力是在加州,去年开始执法,对其余的美国潜在的重大影响

胜过政府起诉阻止2018年加州的法律,阻止它生效多年,但诉讼的拜登政府已经下降。

周五,网络中立法院的决定欢呼的支持者,但呼吁联邦网络中立的法律。

“这胜利是很重要的,因为它提供了保护人们在我们的谈话最多的州和推动国家前进,”马特·伍德说,副总统的政策和总法律顾问的消费者权益保护组织,新闻自由在一份声明中说。“然而,巨大的,我们仍然需要拜登FCC收回其权威不仅对全国开放的互联网规则,但对于政策促进负担得起,富有弹性,对每个人都公正合理的互联网连接。”

大型电信公司反对更严格的监管,网络中立原则,在法庭上,激烈的竞争着。他们说,规定可以破坏投资宽带和引入的不确定性是什么可接受的商业实践。

广告
他们说他们喜欢全国各州的一个方法,但这个行业之前联邦网络中立原则。但参议院划分双方五五开,立法在国会可能不会吸引足够的支持。
  • 发表在2022年1月29日07:41点坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

评论

现在评论 阅读评论(1)

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
\"&lt;p&gt;FILE
FILE - In this June 19, 2018, file photo, a router and internet switch are displayed. On Friday, Jan. 28, 2022, a federal appeals court upheld California’s net neutrality law, rejecting an attempt by telecommunications industry groups to prevent the state from enforcing it. (AP Photo\/Charles Krupa, File)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>A federal appeals court has upheld California's net neutrality law<\/a>, rejecting an attempt by telecommunications industry groups to prevent the state from enforcing it.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a previous ruling, which means the status quo stays and the state can continue to enforce the law. This means California can continue its ban on internet providers slowing down or blocking access to websites and applications that don't pay for premium service.

California's net neutrality<\/a> law was signed by former Gov. Jerry Brown<\/a> in 2018. That came after regulators during the Trump administration killed federal net neutrality rules designed to prevent AT&T<\/a>, Comcast<\/a>, Verizon<\/a> and other major internet providers from exploiting their dominance to favor certain services or apps over others.

In response, seven states and Puerto Rico enacted their own net neutrality policies. The most expansive effort of this sort was in California, which started enforcing the law last year, with potentially significant consequences for the rest of the U.S.

The Trump administration sued to block California's 2018 law, preventing it from taking effect for years, but the Biden administration has dropped that lawsuit.

On Friday, proponents of net neutrality cheered the court's decision, but called for federal net neutrality laws.

\"This win is significant because it offers protections to people in our most populous state and drives the national conversation forward,\" said Matt Wood, vice president of policy<\/a> and general counsel of consumer advocacy group Free Press, in a statement. \"Yet tremendous as it is, we still need the Biden FCC to reclaim its authority not just for nationwide open-internet rules, but for policies promoting affordable, resilient, just and reasonable internet connections for everyone.\"

Big telecom companies oppose the stricter regulation that comes with the net neutrality rules and have fought it fiercely in court. They say the regulations can undermine investment in broadband and introduce uncertainty about what were acceptable business practices.

They say they prefer a national approach to a state-by-state one, but the industry has fought prior federal net neutrality rules. But with a Senate divided 50-50 between the parties, legislation in Congress may not draw enough support to pass.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":89192288,"title":"No conflict of interest in Google deal, says Airtel CEO","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/no-conflict-of-interest-in-google-deal-says-airtel-ceo\/89192288","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":89192294,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"In blow to telecoms, California's net neutrality law upheld","synopsis":"The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a previous ruling, which means the status quo stays and the state can continue to enforce the law. This means California can continue its ban on internet providers slowing down or blocking access to websites and applications that don't pay for premium service.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/in-blow-to-telecoms-californias-net-neutrality-law-upheld","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":131,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":426000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"AP","artdate":"2022-01-29 07:41:18","lastupd":"2022-01-29 07:42:56","breadcrumbTags":["Net neutrality","telecom news","Policy","jerry brown","verizon","at&t","Net Neutrality law","Comcast"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/in-blow-to-telecoms-californias-net-neutrality-law-upheld"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/in-blow-to-telecoms-californias-net-neutrality-law-upheld/89192294">