![\"\"](\"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma<\/a>, after hearing part arguments, listed the matter for further proceedings on May 29.
\"I will demonstrate that there are glaring illegalities in the (trial court) judgment. The evidence placed by the CBI was disregarded. Appreciation of evidence was completely wrong. I will show that the judgment was perverse and there were flaws in it,\" advocate Neeraj Jain, who appeared in the court on behalf of the CBI, argued.
On Monday, the CBI counsel had said the trial court judgment was based on \"wrong conclusions\" and was \"untenable in law\".
Although the CBI had earlier concluded its submissions on the issue of \"leave to appeal\", it is now arguing the matter afresh due to a change of the judge.
Leave to appeal is a formal permission granted by a court to a party to challenge a decision in a higher court.
The lawyer for the CBI had said the case concerned \"five points\" of irregularities -- association between government officials and telecom operators, fixation of a cut-off, violation of the first-come-first-serve principle, non-revision of the entry fee and a money trail of Rs 200 crore.
The illegal acts of the accused caused a loss of Rs 22,000 crore to the public exchequer, he had said.
An appeal filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against the acquittal of all the accused in a connected money-laundering case is also pending before the court.
Advocate Vijay Aggarwal, appearing for some of the acquitted people, including R K Chandolia, had said once an accused is let off in the scheduled offence, the same consequence has to follow in the money-laundering case as well.
Earlier, the case was being heard on a day-to-day basis by Justice Brijesh Sethi, who retired on November 30, 2020. Justice Sethi had released the matter from his board on November 23 of the same year owing to a paucity of time.
Before demitting the office, Justice Sethi had decided various petitions and applications filed by the acquitted individuals and firms in the three cases arising out of the 2G scam probe lodged by the CBI and the ED.
After concluding the submissions in the CBI's main case, the high court would take up the ED's money-laundering case, in which all the accused were acquitted by a special court.
The special court had, on December 21, 2017, acquitted Raja, DMK MP Kanimozhi and others in the CBI and ED cases related to the scam.
Besides Raja and Kanimozhi, the special court had acquitted former telecom secretary Siddharth Behura, Raja's former private secretary R K Chandolia, Unitech Limited<\/a> managing director Sanjay Chandra and three top executives of the Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (RADAG) -- Gautam Doshi, Surendra Pipara and Hari Nair -- in the 2G case lodged by the CBI.
Swan Telecom<\/a> promoters Shahid Balwa and Vinod Goenka and the directors of Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables Private Limited -- Asif Balwa and Rajiv Agarwal -- were also acquitted in the CBI case.
The special court had also acquitted Swan Telecom<\/a> (Private) Limited, Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Limited, Reliance Telecom Limited<\/a>, film producer Karim Morani and Kalaignar TV director Sharad Kumar in the CBI case.
On the same day, the special court had also acquitted 19 accused, including Raja, Kanimozhi, DMK supremo M Karunanidhi's wife Dayalu Ammal, Vinod Goenka, Asif Balwa, Karim Morani, P Amirtham and Sharad Kumar, in the ED case.
It had also acquitted Essar Group<\/a> promoters Ravi Kant Ruia and Anshuman Ruia, Loop Telecom<\/a> promoters I P Khaitan and Kiran Khaitan and four others in a separate case arising out of the 2G scam probe.
On March 19, 2018, the ED approached the high court challenging the special court's order acquitting all the accused.
A day later, the CBI too challenged in the high court the acquittal of the accused.<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":100445234,"title":"Drahi boosts stake in BT to 24.5%, will not make an offer","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/industry\/drahi-boosts-stake-in-bt-to-24-5-will-not-make-an-offer\/100445234","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"industry"}],"related_content":[],"msid":100452024,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"2G scam case: Glaring illegalities in judgment acquitting A Raja and others, CBI tells Delhi HC","synopsis":"Although the CBI had earlier concluded its submissions on the issue of \"leave to appeal\", it is now arguing the matter afresh due to a change of the judge.","titleseo":"industry\/2g-scam-case-glaring-illegalities-in-judgment-acquitting-a-raja-and-others-cbi-tells-delhi-hc","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":227,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":1118000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"PTI","artdate":"2023-05-23 19:39:20","lastupd":"2023-05-23 19:45:21","breadcrumbTags":["cbi","A Raja","2g spectrum case","Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma","Unitech Limited","Swan Telecom","Reliance Telecom Limited","Loop Telecom","Essar Group","industry"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"industry\/2g-scam-case-glaring-illegalities-in-judgment-acquitting-a-raja-and-others-cbi-tells-delhi-hc"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="Industry" data-category_id="18" data-date="2023-05-23" data-index="article_1">
读到
正义Dinesh Kumar沙玛听到部分参数后,上市,5月29日进一步诉讼。
“我要证明有明显的违法行为(初审法院)的判断。CBI的证据将被忽视。升值的证据是完全错误的。我将表明,审判是反常而有缺陷,“主Neeraj Jain说,出现在法庭上代表英国工业联合会提出。
周一,英国工业联合会顾问说初审法院判决是基于“错误的结论”,“在法律上站不住脚的”。
虽然CBI此前得出其提交的问题上“离开上诉”,现在重新争论此事由于改变法官。
离开上诉法院颁发的正式许可方挑战高等法院的决定。
CBI的律师曾表示与案件相关的违规行为的“5分”——政府官员和电信运营商之间的联系,固定截止,违反了先到先得原则,non-revision报名费和钱200卢比的踪迹。
被告的违法行为造成的损失22000卢比的公共财政大臣,他说的话。
提交的上诉执法局(ED)对连接的所有被告无罪释放洗钱案也在等待法院之前。
主Vijay Aggarwal,出现一些无罪的人,包括R K Chandolia,曾经说过一次指责是让在预定的犯罪行为,必须遵循相同的结果的洗钱案。
早些时候,被正义日常听到Brijesh Sethi退休在2020年11月30日。正义Sethi从董事会公布此事同年11月23日由于缺乏时间。
之前辞职办公室,正义Sethi无罪决定各种申诉和申请的个人和公司三种情况引起的2 g诈骗调查提出CBI和ED。
结束后提交在英国工业联合会的主要情况下,最高法院将ED的洗钱案,所有特别法庭的被告被判无罪。
特别法庭,2017年12月21日被拉贾,DMK议员Kanimozhi和其他英国工业联合会和ED案件相关的骗局。
除了拉贾和Kanimozhi,特别法庭无罪释放前电信部长哈斯毕贺拉,拉贾的前私人秘书R K Chandolia,Unitech有限总裁桑杰钱德拉和三个高管的依赖Anil迪路拜·安巴尼集团(RADAG)——Gautam Doshi苏伦德拉Pipara和哈里Nair, CBI在2 g的情况下提出的。
天鹅电信发起人Shahid Balwa Vinod戈恩卡和董事Kusegaon水果和蔬菜私人有限——阿西夫•Balwa和拉吉夫·阿加瓦尔——在CBI情况下也无罪释放。
特别法庭也无罪释放天鹅电信(私人)有限公司,Unitech无线(泰米尔纳德邦)有限公司,信实电信有限公司、电影制片人卡里姆Morani和Kalaignar电视导演Sharad Kumar在CBI的情况下。
同日,特别法庭也无罪19指控,包括拉贾,Kanimozhi, DMK最高领导人M卡鲁纳尼迪的妻子安马尔Dayalu Vinod戈恩卡,Asif Balwa,卡里姆Morani P Amirtham和拉德·库马尔的ED。
它也被爱萨集团推动者Ravi Kant鲁亚和Anshuman俄罗斯、循环电信启动子我P比Kiran比和其他四人在一个单独的情况下引起的2 g诈骗调查。
2018年3月19日,ED向高等法院挑战特别法庭的命令举步维艰,所有的指责。
一天后,英国工业联合会也挑战在高等法院被告无罪释放。
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动