\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>NEW DELHI: Captive Non-Public Network (CNPN<\/a>) or private 5G network<\/a> deployments by system integrators may lead to operational inefficiencies, capital burden, and eventually prove to be counterproductive, a telecom industry<\/a> group said.

\"Enterprises or system integrators should not put up private 5G networks as it will be counter-productive, and bring inefficiencies,\" SP Kochhar, director general, Cellular Operators Association of India (
Coai<\/a>) said, adding that captive networks deployed by telecom carriers would be cost-effective.
Coai represents
Reliance Jio<\/a> and Bharti Airtel<\/a> as well as Vodafone Idea<\/a> which is yet to kickstart consumer 5G services.

Nearly five IT biggies applied for private 5G network across more than 20 locations. These include
Tata Consultancy Services<\/a>, Infosys, Wipro, L&T and Capgemini, following the telecom department's (DoT<\/a>) guidelines last year.

Meanwhile, following the legal view and lukewarm response from companies, the government is not keen to allocate spectrum separately for captive use.

In April 2022, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (
Trai<\/a>) recommended multiple options for setting up a captive wireless network for non-public use that includes a direct radiowaves allocation and leasing out spectrum from a telecom carrier.

Telecom carriers see captive networks as an opportunity to augment their enterprise business, and argue that direct spectrum allocation for such networks would hamper the business case for them.

\"RF (radio frequency) can't be locked inside or segregated from an outside network. By putting it in a campus, enterprises will become mini TSP (telecom service provider), and despite not having expertise, have to buy equipment, install, operate, utilise and maintain the network which is a totally different line of business,\" Kochhar said, adding that for RF planning, companies have to anyway turn to telcos.

Telecommunications is a capital-intensive sector, and even if an enterprise deploys it by putting in capital expenditure, they have no experience running a wireless network, according to the industry group.

5G cellular technology coupled with network slicing and edge computing have enabled cost-effective wireless private networks that offer software-backed controls, operations and remote monitoring capabilities to enterprises.

Further Kochhar said that a private network set up by a non-telco company would lead to inefficiencies since a numbering scheme as per existing norms, would be different from outside, and enterprise users have to buy a seperate phone or device.

Telecom operators have expertise and since they will be committing to optimum service-level agreements, and a deployment through them would be cost-effective as enterprises could only be paying for operational expenses (opex), the executive added.

(With inputs from Mansi Taneja)<\/em>
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":99956716,"title":"Malaysia to move to dual network model for 5G after expanding coverage","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/industry\/malaysia-to-move-to-dual-network-model-for-5g-after-expanding-coverage\/99956716","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"industry"}],"related_content":[],"msid":99960043,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"'Non-telco private 5G network may be inefficient, counterproductive'","synopsis":"Meanwhile, following the legal view and lukewarm response from companies, the government is not keen to allocate spectrum separately for captive use.","titleseo":"industry\/non-telco-private-5g-network-may-be-inefficient-counterproductive","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Muntazir Abbas","author_link":"\/author\/479234376\/muntazir-abbas","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479234376.cms?width=100&height=100&hostid=268","author_additional":{"thumbsize":true,"msid":479234376,"author_name":"Muntazir Abbas","author_seo_name":"muntazir-abbas","designation":"Editor","agency":false}}],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":1858,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":7543000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETTelecom","artdate":"2023-05-03 16:10:52","lastupd":"2023-05-03 18:25:34","breadcrumbTags":["5g network","CNPN","coai","Reliance Jio","Bharti Airtel","Vodafone Idea","Tata Consultancy Services","DoT","Trai","industry"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"industry\/non-telco-private-5g-network-may-be-inefficient-counterproductive"}}" data-authors="[" muntazir abbas"]" data-category-name="Industry" data-category_id="18" data-date="2023-05-03" data-index="article_1">

“Non-telco私人5 g网络可能效率低下,会适得其反的

与此同时,公司的法律观点,不冷不热的回应后,政府并不急于分配频谱分别被使用。

Muntazir阿巴斯
  • 更新2023年5月3日下午06:25坚持
阅读: 100年行业专业人士
读者的形象读到100年行业专业人士
新德里:俘虏非公开网络(CNPN)或私人5 g网络部署的系统集成商可能导致运营效率低下,资金负担,并最终被证明是适得其反,电信行业小组说。

“企业或系统集成商不应该把私人5 g网络将会适得其反,带来效率低下,“SP Kochhar,总经理,印度手机运营商协会(Coai)补充说,俘虏网络由电信运营商部署是划算的。
Coai代表依赖JioBharti Airtel以及沃达丰的想法这是消费者5 g服务没有启动。

广告
近这庞然大物申请私人5 g网络20多个位置。这些包括塔塔咨询服务公司后,印孚瑟斯,Wipro, L&T凯捷,电信部门的(去年)的指导方针。

与此同时,公司的法律观点,不冷不热的回应后,政府并不急于分配频谱分别被使用。

2022年4月,印度电信管理局(火车)推荐多个选项设置一个俘虏无线网络发送无线电波为非公开使用,包括直接从电信运营商频谱分配和租赁。

电信运营商将俘虏网络视为一个机遇,增加他们的企业业务,和认为直接频谱分配等网络会阻碍他们的业务案例。

“RF(射频)不能被锁在或从外部网络隔离。在校园,企业将成为迷你TSP(电信服务提供者),尽管没有专业知识,必须购买设备,安装、操作、使用和维护的网络是一个完全不同的业务线,“Kochhar补充说,为射频规划,公司必须向电信公司。

广告
电信是一个资本密集型行业,即使一个企业部署通过将资本支出,他们没有经验运行一个无线网络,根据工业集团。

5 g蜂窝技术加上网络分割和边缘计算使得无线私人网络,提供具有成本效益的软件控制,操作和远程监控功能的企业。

进一步Kochhar说non-telco公司设立的私人网络会导致低效率自编号方案按现有规范,将不同以外,企业用户不得不购买独立的手机或设备。

电信运营商有专业知识和他们将致力于最优服务水平协议以来,通过他们将成本效益和部署企业只能支付运营费用(opex),执行补充道。

从曼西希夫(输入)
  • 2023年5月3日发表04:10点是
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>NEW DELHI: Captive Non-Public Network (CNPN<\/a>) or private 5G network<\/a> deployments by system integrators may lead to operational inefficiencies, capital burden, and eventually prove to be counterproductive, a telecom industry<\/a> group said.

\"Enterprises or system integrators should not put up private 5G networks as it will be counter-productive, and bring inefficiencies,\" SP Kochhar, director general, Cellular Operators Association of India (
Coai<\/a>) said, adding that captive networks deployed by telecom carriers would be cost-effective.
Coai represents
Reliance Jio<\/a> and Bharti Airtel<\/a> as well as Vodafone Idea<\/a> which is yet to kickstart consumer 5G services.

Nearly five IT biggies applied for private 5G network across more than 20 locations. These include
Tata Consultancy Services<\/a>, Infosys, Wipro, L&T and Capgemini, following the telecom department's (DoT<\/a>) guidelines last year.

Meanwhile, following the legal view and lukewarm response from companies, the government is not keen to allocate spectrum separately for captive use.

In April 2022, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (
Trai<\/a>) recommended multiple options for setting up a captive wireless network for non-public use that includes a direct radiowaves allocation and leasing out spectrum from a telecom carrier.

Telecom carriers see captive networks as an opportunity to augment their enterprise business, and argue that direct spectrum allocation for such networks would hamper the business case for them.

\"RF (radio frequency) can't be locked inside or segregated from an outside network. By putting it in a campus, enterprises will become mini TSP (telecom service provider), and despite not having expertise, have to buy equipment, install, operate, utilise and maintain the network which is a totally different line of business,\" Kochhar said, adding that for RF planning, companies have to anyway turn to telcos.

Telecommunications is a capital-intensive sector, and even if an enterprise deploys it by putting in capital expenditure, they have no experience running a wireless network, according to the industry group.

5G cellular technology coupled with network slicing and edge computing have enabled cost-effective wireless private networks that offer software-backed controls, operations and remote monitoring capabilities to enterprises.

Further Kochhar said that a private network set up by a non-telco company would lead to inefficiencies since a numbering scheme as per existing norms, would be different from outside, and enterprise users have to buy a seperate phone or device.

Telecom operators have expertise and since they will be committing to optimum service-level agreements, and a deployment through them would be cost-effective as enterprises could only be paying for operational expenses (opex), the executive added.

(With inputs from Mansi Taneja)<\/em>
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":99956716,"title":"Malaysia to move to dual network model for 5G after expanding coverage","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/industry\/malaysia-to-move-to-dual-network-model-for-5g-after-expanding-coverage\/99956716","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"industry"}],"related_content":[],"msid":99960043,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"'Non-telco private 5G network may be inefficient, counterproductive'","synopsis":"Meanwhile, following the legal view and lukewarm response from companies, the government is not keen to allocate spectrum separately for captive use.","titleseo":"industry\/non-telco-private-5g-network-may-be-inefficient-counterproductive","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Muntazir Abbas","author_link":"\/author\/479234376\/muntazir-abbas","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479234376.cms?width=100&height=100&hostid=268","author_additional":{"thumbsize":true,"msid":479234376,"author_name":"Muntazir Abbas","author_seo_name":"muntazir-abbas","designation":"Editor","agency":false}}],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":1858,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":7543000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETTelecom","artdate":"2023-05-03 16:10:52","lastupd":"2023-05-03 18:25:34","breadcrumbTags":["5g network","CNPN","coai","Reliance Jio","Bharti Airtel","Vodafone Idea","Tata Consultancy Services","DoT","Trai","industry"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"industry\/non-telco-private-5g-network-may-be-inefficient-counterproductive"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/industry/non-telco-private-5g-network-may-be-inefficient-counterproductive/99960043">