NEW DELHI: The full implications of Beijing’s rapid-fire moves against Jack Ma<\/a>’s internet<\/a> empire in recent days won’t be apparent for weeks, but one lesson is already clear: The glory days for China<\/a>’s technology giants are over.

The country’s government imprinted its authority indelibly on the country’s
technology industry<\/a> in the span of a few days. In landmark announcements, it slapped a record $2.8 billion fine on Alibaba Group Holding Ltd<\/a> for abusing its market dominance, then ordered an overhaul of Ant Group Co. On Tuesday, regulators summoned 34 of the country’s largest companies from Tencent Holdings Ltd<\/a> to TikTok owner ByteDance Ltd, warning them “the red line of laws cannot be touched.”

The unspoken message to Ma and his cohorts was the decade of unfettered expansion that created challengers to Facebook Inc and Google was at an end. Gone are the days when giants like Alibaba, Ant or Tencent could steamroll incumbents in adjacent businesses with their superior financial might and data hoards.

“Between the rules for Ant and the $2.8 billion fine for Alibaba, the golden days are over for China’s big tech firms,” said Mark Tanner, founder of Shanghai-based China Skinny. “Even those who haven’t been targeted to the same extreme will be toning down their expansion strategies and adapting many elements of their business to the new bridled environment.”

Tech companies are likely to move far more cautiously on acquisitions, over-compensate on getting signoffs from Beijing, and levy lower fees on the domestic internet traffic they dominate. Ant in particular will have to find ways to un-tether China’s largest payments service from its fast-growth consumer lending business and shrink its signature Yu’ebao money market fund -- once the world’s largest.

Even companies that have been less scrutinized so far -- like Tencent or Meituan and Pinduoduo Inc -- are likely to see growth opportunities curtailed.

The watershed moment was years in the making. In the early part of the last decade, visionary entrepreneurs like Ma and Tencent co-founder Pony Ma (no relation) created multi-billion dollar empires by up-ending businesses from retail to communications, elevating the lives of hundreds of millions and serving as role models for an increasingly affluent younger generation. But the enormous opportunities coupled with years of hyper-growth also fostered a winner-takes-all land-grab mentality that unnerved the Communist Party.

Regulators grew concerned as the likes of Alibaba and Tencent aggressively safeguarded and extended their moats, using data to squeeze out rivals or forcing merchants and content publishers into exclusive arrangements. Their growing influence over every aspect of Chinese life became more apparent as they became the conduits through which many of the country’s 1.3 billion bought and paid for things -- handing over vast amounts of data on spending behavior. Chief among them were Alibaba and Tencent, who became the industry’s kingmakers by investing billions of dollars into hundreds of startups.

All that came to a head in 2020 when Ma -- on the verge of ushering in Ant’s record $35 billion IPO -- publicly denigrated out-of-touch regulators and the “old men” of the powerful banking industry.

\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>
The unprecedented series of regulatory actions since encapsulates how Beijing is now intent on reining in its internet and
fintech<\/a> giants, a broad campaign that’s wiped roughly $200 billion off Alibaba’s valuation since October. The e-commerce giant’s speedy capitulation after a four-month probe underscores its vulnerability to further regulatory action.

Chinese titans from Tencent to Meituan are next up in the cross-hairs because they’re the dominant players in their respective fields. Regulators may focus on delivery giant Meituan’s historical practice of forced exclusivity -- particularly as it expands into burgeoning areas like community e-commerce -- while investigating Tencent’s dominant gaming service and whether its messaging platform WeChat excludes competitors, Credit Suisse analysts Kenneth Fong and Ashley Xu wrote Tuesday.

“The days of reckless expansion and wild growth are gone forever, and from now on the development of these firms is likely going to be put under strict government control. That’s going to be the case in the foreseeable future,” said Shen Meng, a director at Beijing-based boutique investment bank Chanson & Co. “Companies will have to face the reality that they need to streamline their non-core businesses and reduce their influence across industries. The cases of Alibaba and Ant will prompt peers to take the initiative to restructure, using them as the reference.”

The revamp of Ant -- a sprawling financial titan once worth as much as $320 billion -- is a case in point. In its ruling, the People’s Bank of China said it wanted to “prevent the disorderly expansion of capital” and ensure that all of Ant’s financial business will be regulated under a single holding company.

What Bloomberg Intelligence says<\/strong>

\"Ant Group’s prospects could wane further after China halts improper linking of Alipay payments with Ant’s other products. New curbs on Yu’ebao also hurts its wealth business. Alipay’s 711 million active users are its potential fintech-product buyers. Ant’s valuation could now be near banks we cover (average 5x forward earnings) compared with over 30x at its IPO attempt.\" - Francis Chan, analyst<\/em>

Ma’s company will likely have to apply and register to get into any new areas of finance in future -- a potential ordeal given the infamously creaky wheels of Beijing bureaucracy. It faces restrictions in every key business -- from payments and wealth management to credit lending.

The company’s most lucrative credit lending arm will be capped based on registered capital. It must fold its Huabei and Jiebei loan units -- which had 1.7 trillion yuan ($260 billion) of outstanding loans between them as of June -- into a new national company that will likely raise more capital to support its operations. And Ant must reduce its Yu’ebao money market wing, which encompasses a self-operated Tianhong Yu’ebao fund that held $183 billion of assets as of the end of 2020, making it one of the largest pools of wealth in the world.

\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>
Alibaba appears to have got off lightly in comparison. While the $2.8 billion was triple the previous record set by Qualcomm Inc’s 2015 penalty, it amounts to under 5% of the company’s annual revenue. Far more insidious however is the threat of future action and the dampening effect it will have on Alibaba.

The fine came with a plethora of “rectifications” that Alibaba will have to put in place -- such as curtailing the practice of forcing merchants to choose between Alibaba or a competing platform. Executives also volunteered to open up Alibaba’s marketplaces more, lower costs for merchants while spending “billions of yuan” to help its clients handle e-commerce.

Ant will likewise have to tame its market share grab in payments. Changes to that business, which is fending off Tencent’s WeChat Pay, were among the top priorities regulators outlined. Ant pledged to return the business “to its origin” by focusing on micro-payments and convenience for users.

The most amorphous yet dire threat lies in the simple principle implicit in regulators’ pronouncements over the past few days: that Beijing will brook no monopolies that threaten its hold on power.

The central bank warned in draft rules released previously that any non-bank payment company with half of the market for online transactions -- or two entities with a combined two-thirds share -- could be subject to antitrust probes. If a monopoly is confirmed, the State Council or cabinet has powers to levy a plethora of penalties, including breaking up the entity.

That’s an entrepreneur’s ultimate nightmare.

“Everyone is on the regulators’ radar, and it really depends on each one’s reaction next,” Chanson & Co’s Shen said. “It’s better to take the initiative to self-rectify, rather than having to go through restructuring ordered by the regulators, which may not have your best interests in mind.”
<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":82081168,"title":"Optiemus buys out Wistron stake in manufacturing JV","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/optiemus-buys-out-wistron-stake-in-manufacturing-jv\/82081168","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"82065220","title":"Jack Ma 5","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"business\/international-business\/jack-mas-double-whammy-marks-end-of-china-techs-golden-age\/jack-ma-5","category_name":"Jack Ma\u2019s double-whammy marks end of China tech\u2019s golden age","synopsis":"The Chinese government slapped a record $2.8 billion fine on Jack Ma's Alibaba Group for abusing its market dominance. (File photo: Reuters)","thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-35614\/82065220.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/business\/international-business\/jack-mas-double-whammy-marks-end-of-china-techs-golden-age\/jack-ma-5\/82065220"}],"msid":82081285,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Jack Ma\u2019s double-whammy marks end of China tech\u2019s golden age","synopsis":"The full implications of Beijing\u2019s rapid-fire moves against Jack Ma\u2019s internet empire in recent days won\u2019t be apparent for weeks, but one lesson is already clear: The glory days for China\u2019s technology giants are over.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/jack-mas-double-whammy-marks-end-of-china-techs-golden-age","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":377,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":1477000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"Bloomberg","artdate":"2021-04-15 13:31:19","lastupd":"2021-04-15 13:35:08","breadcrumbTags":["Alibaba Group Holding Ltd","Jack Ma","China","Jack Ma news","Jack Ma empire","technology industry","CHina Jack Ma","Tencent Holdings Ltd","FinTech","Internet"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/jack-mas-double-whammy-marks-end-of-china-techs-golden-age"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2021-04-15" data-index="article_1">

马云的双重打击标志着中国科技的黄金时代的终结

中国政府的快速行动的全部影响对马云的互联网帝国最近几天不会明显的好几个星期,但一个教训已经明确:中国的科技巨头的光辉岁月。

  • 更新于2021年4月15日下午01:35坚持
阅读: 100年行业专业人士
读者的形象读到100年行业专业人士

新德里:中国政府的快速行动的全部影响马云互联网帝国最近几天不会明显的好几个星期,但一个教训已经明确:光辉岁月中国的科技巨头已经过去了。

该国政府印的权威不可磨灭的科技行业在几天。在具有里程碑意义的声明,它打了创纪录的28亿美元罚款阿里巴巴集团(Alibaba Group Holding Ltd .)滥用市场主导地位,然后下令对蚂蚁集团有限公司周二,监管机构召集34全国最大的公司腾讯控股有限公司TikTok主人ByteDance有限公司警告他们不能触碰法律的红线。”

广告
马的不言而喻的消息和他的同伴们是自由的十年扩张创造了挑战者Facebook Inc .和谷歌在结束。的日子一去不复返了巨人像阿里巴巴一样,蚂蚁或者腾讯可以压倒在职者在邻近企业与上级财务实力和数据储备。

“蚂蚁的规则与阿里巴巴的28亿美元罚款,金色的日子一去不复返了中国大科技公司,”马克·坦纳说的创始人上海中国瘦。“甚至那些还没有针对相同的极端将下调其业务扩张战略和适应许多元素新的停滞的环境。”

科技公司可能在收购时行动更加小心谨慎,因此从北京获得批文,征收费用低的国内互联网流量占主导地位。特别是蚂蚁会想办法un-tether中国最大的支付服务从其快速增长的消费信贷业务和收缩其标志性Yu 'ebao货币市场基金——世界上最大的一次。

甚至公司迄今为止更少的关注——像腾讯或Meituan和Pinduoduo公司——可能会看到增长机会的减少。

年分水岭。在过去十年的早期,有远见的企业家像马和腾讯创始人马化腾(没有关系)创造了数十亿美元的帝国崛起,颠覆企业从零售到通信、升降数亿人的生活和服务作为日益富裕的年轻一代的榜样。但巨大的机会加上多年的高速发展也培养了“赢者通吃”的抢地盘心态,让共产党感到不安。

广告
监管机构越来越关注喜欢的阿里巴巴和腾讯积极维护和扩展他们的护城河,使用数据排挤竞争对手或迫使商人和内容出版商为独家安排。不断增长的对中国人生活的方方面面的影响更加明显,因为他们成为许多国家的管道13亿购买和支付的东西——交出大量关于消费行为的数据。其中最主要的是阿里巴巴和腾讯,成为该行业的拥护者投资数十亿美元到数百个创业公司。

马,这一切在2020年了,即将进入了蚂蚁的创纪录的350亿美元IPO——公开诋毁不食人间烟火的监管机构和强大的银行业的“老男人”。


以来前所未有的一系列监管行为封装北京现在热衷于在互联网和控制fintech巨人,一个广泛的活动被阿里巴巴自去年10月以来的估值约2000亿美元。电子商务巨头的快速投降后四个月调查突显出其脆弱性进一步的监管行动。

中国巨头腾讯Meituan接下来在改,因为他们各自领域的主要球员。监管机构可能会专注于交付巨大Meituan迫使排他性的历史实践,尤其是当它扩展到新兴的社区电子商务等领域,而调查腾讯的主要游戏服务和消息传递平台微信是否排除了竞争对手,瑞士信贷(Credit Suisse)分析师Kenneth Fong和阿什利徐周二写道。

“鲁莽的扩张和野生生长的时代已经一去不复返了,现在从这些公司的发展很可能会把政府的严格控制之下。这就是在可预见的未来,“沈孟说,北京精品投资银行主管歌曲& Co。”企业将不得不面对现实,他们需要使其非核心业务和减少影响各行业。阿里巴巴和蚂蚁的情况下将促使同伴主动调整,使用它们作为参考。”

蚂蚁的改革——一个庞大的金融巨头曾经价值高达3200亿美元,是一个很好的例子。在其执政,中国人民银行表示,它希望“防止无序扩张的资本”,并确保所有的蚂蚁的金融业务将受一个控股公司。

布隆伯格的情报说什么

“蚁群的前景可能会进一步减弱中国暂停后连接不当支付宝支付与蚂蚁的其他产品。新的限制于'ebao也损害了其财富管理业务。支付宝的7.11亿活跃用户潜在fintech-product买家。蚂蚁的估值可能已接近银行我们封面(平均5倍市盈率)相比,超过30 x在IPO的尝试。”-分析师弗朗西斯·陈

马英九的公司可能不得不申请并注册进入任何未来金融业的新领域——一个潜在的折磨的臭名昭著的破旧轮子北京官僚机构。它面临着限制在每一个关键业务——从支付和财富管理信用贷款。

公司最赚钱的信用贷款部门将根据注册资本限制。它必须折叠华北和Jiebei贷款单位——有1.7万亿元(合2600亿美元)的贷款余额之间的6月,到一个新的国家的公司可能会筹集更多资金以支持其业务。和Ant必须减少其Yu 'ebao货币市场,包括自营天虹Yu 'ebao基金持有1830亿美元的资产在2020年底,使其成为世界上最大的池的财富。


阿里巴巴相比似乎轻松脱身。而设定的28亿美元纪录的三倍高通(qcom . o:行情)2015年的惩罚,它相当于在公司的年度收入的5%。更阴险的不过是未来的威胁行动和减震效应会对阿里巴巴。

罚款了过多的“纠正”,阿里巴巴必须到位,如限制的做法迫使商家选择阿里巴巴或一个竞争平台。高管还自愿打开阿里巴巴的市场,为商人而降低成本支出“数十亿元”来帮助客户处理电子商务。

蚂蚁同样要驯服它的市场份额获取支付。变更业务,避开腾讯的微信,优先考虑的是监管机构提出。蚂蚁承诺返回业务”它的起源”通过关注支付和方便用户。

最无定形可怕的威胁在于简单的原则隐含在监管机构的声明过去几天:北京将不容垄断,威胁其政权。

中央银行此前公布的草案警告说,任何非银行支付公司一半的在线交易市场——或者两个实体结合三分之二份额——可能受到反垄断调查。如果垄断被证实,国务院或内阁权力征收大量的处罚,包括分手的实体。

这是一个企业家的终极噩梦。

“每个人都在监管机构的雷达,它取决于每个人的反应,”沈歌曲& Co的说。“最好是主动self-rectify,而不必经过重组监管机构下令,这可能没有你的最佳利益。”

  • 发布于2021年4月15日下午01:31坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序

NEW DELHI: The full implications of Beijing’s rapid-fire moves against Jack Ma<\/a>’s internet<\/a> empire in recent days won’t be apparent for weeks, but one lesson is already clear: The glory days for China<\/a>’s technology giants are over.

The country’s government imprinted its authority indelibly on the country’s
technology industry<\/a> in the span of a few days. In landmark announcements, it slapped a record $2.8 billion fine on Alibaba Group Holding Ltd<\/a> for abusing its market dominance, then ordered an overhaul of Ant Group Co. On Tuesday, regulators summoned 34 of the country’s largest companies from Tencent Holdings Ltd<\/a> to TikTok owner ByteDance Ltd, warning them “the red line of laws cannot be touched.”

The unspoken message to Ma and his cohorts was the decade of unfettered expansion that created challengers to Facebook Inc and Google was at an end. Gone are the days when giants like Alibaba, Ant or Tencent could steamroll incumbents in adjacent businesses with their superior financial might and data hoards.

“Between the rules for Ant and the $2.8 billion fine for Alibaba, the golden days are over for China’s big tech firms,” said Mark Tanner, founder of Shanghai-based China Skinny. “Even those who haven’t been targeted to the same extreme will be toning down their expansion strategies and adapting many elements of their business to the new bridled environment.”

Tech companies are likely to move far more cautiously on acquisitions, over-compensate on getting signoffs from Beijing, and levy lower fees on the domestic internet traffic they dominate. Ant in particular will have to find ways to un-tether China’s largest payments service from its fast-growth consumer lending business and shrink its signature Yu’ebao money market fund -- once the world’s largest.

Even companies that have been less scrutinized so far -- like Tencent or Meituan and Pinduoduo Inc -- are likely to see growth opportunities curtailed.

The watershed moment was years in the making. In the early part of the last decade, visionary entrepreneurs like Ma and Tencent co-founder Pony Ma (no relation) created multi-billion dollar empires by up-ending businesses from retail to communications, elevating the lives of hundreds of millions and serving as role models for an increasingly affluent younger generation. But the enormous opportunities coupled with years of hyper-growth also fostered a winner-takes-all land-grab mentality that unnerved the Communist Party.

Regulators grew concerned as the likes of Alibaba and Tencent aggressively safeguarded and extended their moats, using data to squeeze out rivals or forcing merchants and content publishers into exclusive arrangements. Their growing influence over every aspect of Chinese life became more apparent as they became the conduits through which many of the country’s 1.3 billion bought and paid for things -- handing over vast amounts of data on spending behavior. Chief among them were Alibaba and Tencent, who became the industry’s kingmakers by investing billions of dollars into hundreds of startups.

All that came to a head in 2020 when Ma -- on the verge of ushering in Ant’s record $35 billion IPO -- publicly denigrated out-of-touch regulators and the “old men” of the powerful banking industry.

\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>
The unprecedented series of regulatory actions since encapsulates how Beijing is now intent on reining in its internet and
fintech<\/a> giants, a broad campaign that’s wiped roughly $200 billion off Alibaba’s valuation since October. The e-commerce giant’s speedy capitulation after a four-month probe underscores its vulnerability to further regulatory action.

Chinese titans from Tencent to Meituan are next up in the cross-hairs because they’re the dominant players in their respective fields. Regulators may focus on delivery giant Meituan’s historical practice of forced exclusivity -- particularly as it expands into burgeoning areas like community e-commerce -- while investigating Tencent’s dominant gaming service and whether its messaging platform WeChat excludes competitors, Credit Suisse analysts Kenneth Fong and Ashley Xu wrote Tuesday.

“The days of reckless expansion and wild growth are gone forever, and from now on the development of these firms is likely going to be put under strict government control. That’s going to be the case in the foreseeable future,” said Shen Meng, a director at Beijing-based boutique investment bank Chanson & Co. “Companies will have to face the reality that they need to streamline their non-core businesses and reduce their influence across industries. The cases of Alibaba and Ant will prompt peers to take the initiative to restructure, using them as the reference.”

The revamp of Ant -- a sprawling financial titan once worth as much as $320 billion -- is a case in point. In its ruling, the People’s Bank of China said it wanted to “prevent the disorderly expansion of capital” and ensure that all of Ant’s financial business will be regulated under a single holding company.

What Bloomberg Intelligence says<\/strong>

\"Ant Group’s prospects could wane further after China halts improper linking of Alipay payments with Ant’s other products. New curbs on Yu’ebao also hurts its wealth business. Alipay’s 711 million active users are its potential fintech-product buyers. Ant’s valuation could now be near banks we cover (average 5x forward earnings) compared with over 30x at its IPO attempt.\" - Francis Chan, analyst<\/em>

Ma’s company will likely have to apply and register to get into any new areas of finance in future -- a potential ordeal given the infamously creaky wheels of Beijing bureaucracy. It faces restrictions in every key business -- from payments and wealth management to credit lending.

The company’s most lucrative credit lending arm will be capped based on registered capital. It must fold its Huabei and Jiebei loan units -- which had 1.7 trillion yuan ($260 billion) of outstanding loans between them as of June -- into a new national company that will likely raise more capital to support its operations. And Ant must reduce its Yu’ebao money market wing, which encompasses a self-operated Tianhong Yu’ebao fund that held $183 billion of assets as of the end of 2020, making it one of the largest pools of wealth in the world.

\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>
Alibaba appears to have got off lightly in comparison. While the $2.8 billion was triple the previous record set by Qualcomm Inc’s 2015 penalty, it amounts to under 5% of the company’s annual revenue. Far more insidious however is the threat of future action and the dampening effect it will have on Alibaba.

The fine came with a plethora of “rectifications” that Alibaba will have to put in place -- such as curtailing the practice of forcing merchants to choose between Alibaba or a competing platform. Executives also volunteered to open up Alibaba’s marketplaces more, lower costs for merchants while spending “billions of yuan” to help its clients handle e-commerce.

Ant will likewise have to tame its market share grab in payments. Changes to that business, which is fending off Tencent’s WeChat Pay, were among the top priorities regulators outlined. Ant pledged to return the business “to its origin” by focusing on micro-payments and convenience for users.

The most amorphous yet dire threat lies in the simple principle implicit in regulators’ pronouncements over the past few days: that Beijing will brook no monopolies that threaten its hold on power.

The central bank warned in draft rules released previously that any non-bank payment company with half of the market for online transactions -- or two entities with a combined two-thirds share -- could be subject to antitrust probes. If a monopoly is confirmed, the State Council or cabinet has powers to levy a plethora of penalties, including breaking up the entity.

That’s an entrepreneur’s ultimate nightmare.

“Everyone is on the regulators’ radar, and it really depends on each one’s reaction next,” Chanson & Co’s Shen said. “It’s better to take the initiative to self-rectify, rather than having to go through restructuring ordered by the regulators, which may not have your best interests in mind.”
<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":82081168,"title":"Optiemus buys out Wistron stake in manufacturing JV","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/optiemus-buys-out-wistron-stake-in-manufacturing-jv\/82081168","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"82065220","title":"Jack Ma 5","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"business\/international-business\/jack-mas-double-whammy-marks-end-of-china-techs-golden-age\/jack-ma-5","category_name":"Jack Ma\u2019s double-whammy marks end of China tech\u2019s golden age","synopsis":"The Chinese government slapped a record $2.8 billion fine on Jack Ma's Alibaba Group for abusing its market dominance. (File photo: Reuters)","thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-35614\/82065220.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/business\/international-business\/jack-mas-double-whammy-marks-end-of-china-techs-golden-age\/jack-ma-5\/82065220"}],"msid":82081285,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Jack Ma\u2019s double-whammy marks end of China tech\u2019s golden age","synopsis":"The full implications of Beijing\u2019s rapid-fire moves against Jack Ma\u2019s internet empire in recent days won\u2019t be apparent for weeks, but one lesson is already clear: The glory days for China\u2019s technology giants are over.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/jack-mas-double-whammy-marks-end-of-china-techs-golden-age","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":377,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":1477000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"Bloomberg","artdate":"2021-04-15 13:31:19","lastupd":"2021-04-15 13:35:08","breadcrumbTags":["Alibaba Group Holding Ltd","Jack Ma","China","Jack Ma news","Jack Ma empire","technology industry","CHina Jack Ma","Tencent Holdings Ltd","FinTech","Internet"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/jack-mas-double-whammy-marks-end-of-china-techs-golden-age"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/jack-mas-double-whammy-marks-end-of-china-techs-golden-age/82081285">