独家
Jio告诉火车拍卖的频谱broadband-from-space服务在全球范围内获得牵引力
Jio,事实上,促使印度电信管理局(火车)“丢弃所有要求”的行政分配广播电视宽带全球卫星球员从太空服务,而不是回频谱分配只能通过拍卖等服务,符合全球趋势。
Jio,事实上,推动印度电信管理部门(火车)“丢弃所有要求”的行政分配广播电视宽带全球卫星球员从太空服务,而不是回频谱分配只能通过拍卖等服务,符合全球趋势。
穆克什Ambani-led电信谴责了行政分配系统,称之为“自由竞争过去的遗迹”,完全不和在今天竞争激烈的电信领域“频谱分配通过拍卖是首选”。
一个卫星网关是一个关键的基础设施资源提供broadband-from-space服务在印度。它控制全球低地球轨道(LEO)卫星星座,也促进了带宽之间的连接卫星和卫星宽带服务的终端用户在印度。
“与被许多涉众所鼓吹的相反,行政分配不再是唯一的频谱分配方式卫星和相关活动和拍卖的频谱被世界各地越来越多的青睐,“Jio在其counter-submission火车说。
电信顾问,Dua咨询支持Jio说,“任何卫星(全球)能力提供者必须遵循法律的土地获取光谱的着陆权,他们想建地上部分(阅读:门户基础设施)和光谱的采集必须通过market-discovered机制,而不是分布或发放”。
在其最新的提交,Jio说:“巴西、沙特阿拉伯、墨西哥、泰国、等多个国家频谱拍卖卫星服务最近宣布或举行。“拍卖的频谱不仅是可行的,但也有所作为的频谱资源分配模式,即使在没有法律约束力的国家如印度。”
全球卫星服务提供商和Jio拱电信的竞争对手Airtel在他们提交的火车,虽然说任何拍卖卫星频段的电波会导致分割和降低卫星宽带服务的效率大大在印度和使服务负担不起。
保留28 ghz频段卫星不会阻止传播的5 g:空间群
“我们强调在24 - 27.5 - ghz乐队,有足够的能力四大移动公司在印度,他们将分别得到800兆赫(MHz) 5 g足够的容量,因此保留27.5 - 28.5和空间不会以任何方式抑制5 g的传播,”中尉创(现已卸任)AK Bhatt,当前的总干事告诉等。
Airtel是Bharti Enterprises的一部分,它还拥有全球重要的股份数量的近地卫星(LEO)算子,OneWeb。苏尼尔•米塔尔董事长Airtel和OneWeb。
最新的对峙阶段,Jio已经卷入了一场与全球卫星的高风险的激战玩家在拍卖令人垂涎的28 Ghz mmWave谱带,目前专门用于卫星服务但考虑高效5 g服务。
Jio要求火车提供28 Ghz频段完全5 g服务。它的建议,不过,一直反对全球卫星球员,他们警告说,任何的28个Ghz频段分配5 g将阻碍卫星操作,导致覆盖缺口和推迟了数年印度的计划促进农村宽带普及率通过新时代的卫星通信系统。
Jio,它敦促火车,以确保“频谱分配政策空间段保持在一个平稳的地面网络,“特别是开放空间的一个组成部分,所有的卫星运营商可能会追逐印度有限的频谱资源。
![\"Jio](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/figure>Kolkata: Reliance Jio<\/a> has told the telecom regulator that auction of spectrum for broadband-from-space services is rapidly gaining ground globally, with Brazil already having done so, and Saudi Arabia, Mexico and Thailand set to follow suit quickly.Jio, in fact, has pushed the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (Trai<\/a>) to \u201cdiscard all demands\u201d of global satellite players for administrative allocation of airwaves for broadband from\u2013space services, and instead back spectrum allocation for such services only via auctions, in line with global trends.
The Mukesh Ambani-led telco has decried the administrative allocation system, calling it \u201ca relic of a competition-free past,\u201d totally at odds in today\u2019s fiercely competitive telecom sector where \u201cspectrum allocation via auction is the preferred choice\u201d.
<\/div><\/div>Jio\u2019s counter-submission is set to further intensify its running battle with global satellite players such as Bharti-backed OneWeb<\/a>, Elon Musk\u2019s Starlink<\/a>, Amazon\u2019s Project Kuiper and the Tata-Telesat combine over the mode of spectrum allocation for establishing and operating satellite gateways in India.
A satellite gateway is a key infrastructure resource to offer broadband-from-space services in India. It controls a global low earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation and also facilitates bandwidth connectivity between a satellite and the end-user of satellite broadband services in India.
\u201cContrary to what is being pedalled by many stakeholders, administrative allocation is no longer the only mode of allocating spectrum to satellite and associated activities and auction of spectrum is being increasingly favoured across the world,\u201d Jio said in its counter-submission to Trai.
Telecom consultants, Dua Consulting has backed Jio, saying \u201cany (global) satellite capacity provider must follow the law of land to acquire landing rights of spectrum for which they intend to build the ground segment (read: gateway infrastructure), and that acquisition of spectrum must be via a market-discovered mechanism, and not distributed or doled out\u201d.
A satellite gateway is a key infrastructure resource to offer broadband-from-space services in India. It controls a global low earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation and also facilitates bandwidth connectivity between a satellite and the end-user of satellite broadband services in India.
\u201cContrary to what is being pedalled by many stakeholders, administrative allocation is no longer the only mode of allocating spectrum to satellite and associated activities and auction of spectrum is being increasingly favoured across the world,\u201d Jio said in its counter-submission to Trai.
Telecom consultants, Dua Consulting has backed Jio, saying \u201cany (global) satellite capacity provider must follow the law of land to acquire landing rights of spectrum for which they intend to build the ground segment (read: gateway infrastructure), and that acquisition of spectrum must be via a market-discovered mechanism, and not distributed or doled out\u201d.
<\/div><\/div>In its original submission to Trai, Jio had batted for assignment of satellite spectrum only via auction, saying such a move would be in step with the Supreme Court\u2019s 2012 verdict that had backed allocation of airwaves through transparent auctions alone.
In its latest submission, Jio said \u201cBrazil, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Thailand, are among several countries where spectrum auction<\/a> for satellite services has been announced or held recently. \u201cAuction of spectrum is not only feasible, but is also gaining ground as a mode of allocating spectrum resources, even in countries with no legal binding such as India.\u201d
Global satellite services providers and Jio\u2019s arch telco rival, Airtel, in their submissions to Trai, though, have said any move to auction satellite spectrum would cause segmentation of airwaves and drive down the efficiency of satellite broadband services drastically in India and make the services unaffordable.
In its latest submission, Jio said \u201cBrazil, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Thailand, are among several countries where spectrum auction<\/a> for satellite services has been announced or held recently. \u201cAuction of spectrum is not only feasible, but is also gaining ground as a mode of allocating spectrum resources, even in countries with no legal binding such as India.\u201d
Global satellite services providers and Jio\u2019s arch telco rival, Airtel, in their submissions to Trai, though, have said any move to auction satellite spectrum would cause segmentation of airwaves and drive down the efficiency of satellite broadband services drastically in India and make the services unaffordable.