独家
高知公司在与Reliance Jio的交易中每年亏损90英镑
确定的损失与2014年RJIL获得的批准有关,其中允许使用水平定向钻井(HDD)、露天挖沟和架空布线方法敷设电缆。
确定的损失与2014年RJIL获得的批准有关,其中允许使用水平定向钻井(HDD)、露天挖沟和架空布线方法敷设电缆。
科钦当地基金审计部门发现,Kochi公司在一笔交易中遭受了近900万卢比/年的损失信实Jio信息通信有限公司(RJIL),因为当局未能评估私营电信公司铺设光纤电缆穿过该公司拥有的多条道路的轨道租金。
确定的损失与2014年RJIL获得的批准有关,其中允许使用水平定向钻井(HDD)、露天挖沟和架空布线方法敷设电缆。
根据审计部门的说法,2015年1月23日,公司理事会确定的轨道租金为每公里37500卢比。根据该公司保存的文件,RJIL在11.42公里的地方使用了HDD,在45.2公里的地方使用了露天挖沟。公司没有任何关于剩余50公里的详细记录。
与此同时,2016年5月14日发给公司秘书的一封信(《印度时报》看到的)显示,该公司在整个路段上都使用架空法拉电缆,除了他们去取硬盘的地方。如果该公司以每年37500卢比的价格为整个107公里沿线的三条电缆收取轨道租金,那么当地政府每年可以以同样的价格从该公司获得120亿卢比的轨道租金。
但是,根据该公司的记录,该公司在2015-16年度只支付了29,800,087卢比。因此,该公司遭受了超过900万卢比的损失,审计部门表示,该部门一直在寻求对此事的解释。
该公司已经批准了安巴尼兄弟拥有的至少6家电信公司的申请。审计部门只审查了一个案例,那就是2014年1月23日对RJIL的批准。
与此同时,该公司与电信服务提供商的交易也令人费解。2016年,RJIL提交了一份新的申请,寻求挖掘20公里路段的许可。
2016年11月6日,指导委员会审议了对RJIL的批准。但一些指导委员会主席,如工程常务委员会主席P M Harris和卫生常务委员会主席V K Minimol,要求在指导委员会批准之前,应将文件提交给指导委员会。然后,问题被推迟了。从那时起,这个问题就被提了出来。
一个月前,哈里斯向公司秘书Haritha V Kumar提交了一份申请,寻求RJIL提供的有关新申请的文件。虽然几天后他给秘书发了一封提醒信,但秘书到现在还没有把文件给他。
Kochi<\/a>: The local fund audit department has found that Kochi corporation suffered a loss of nearly Rs 90 lakh\/year in a single deal with Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd<\/a> (RJIL) as authorities failed to assess the track rent for laying the private telecom company's optical fibre cable through various roads owned by the corporation.<\/p> The loss identified pertains to an approval given to RJIL in 2014 wherein permission was given to lay cables using horizontal directional drilling (HDD), open trenching and overhead cabling methods.<\/p> As per the audit department, the track rent fixed by the corporation council on January 23, 2015, was Rs 37,500\/km. As per the files maintained by the corporation, RJIL resorted to HDD along 11.42km and open trenching along 45.2km. The corporation doesn't have any record on the details related of the remaining 50km.<\/p> Meanwhile, a letter sent to the corporation secretary on May 14, 2016, (accessed by TOI) shows that the company had drawn cables using overhead method along the entire stretch, except the area where they went for HDD. Had the corporation collected track rent for three cables along the entire stretch of 107km at the rate of Rs 37,500 a year, the local body could have got Rs 1.20 crore as track rent from the company for the same deal every year.<\/p> But, as per the records maintained by the corporation, the company had paid just Rs 29,80,087 in 2015-16. So, the corporation suffered a loss of over Rs 90 lakh, said the audit department, which has sought an explanation in this matter.<\/p> The corporation has cleared at least half a dozen more applications by telecom firms owned by Ambani brothers. The audit department has perused only a single case - that is the approval given to RJIL on January 23, 2014.<\/p> Meanwhile, mystery surrounds the corporation's deals with telecom service providers. RJIL had submitted a fresh application seeking permission for digging up a 20-km stretch in 2016.<\/p> Giving approval to RJIL for the same came up for consideration before the steering committee on November 6, 2016. But some of the steering committee chairpersons like works standing committee chairman P M Harris and health standing committee chairperson V K Minimol demanded that the files should be produced before the steering committee prior to giving approval. Then, the issue was postponed. Since then, the issue has been taken up.<\/p> A month ago, Harris had given an application to the corporation secretary, Haritha V Kumar, seeking the files pertaining to fresh application given by RJIL. Though he sent a reminder to the secretary a few days later, the secretary hasn't given the files till date.<\/p> <\/div><\/div>