![\"<p>FILE](\"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
Meta Platforms Inc<\/a> lost a bid on Monday to end a lawsuit in Boston federal court claiming it stole confidential information from artificial-intelligence startup Neural Magic<\/a> Inc.
Meta<\/a> will have to face a trial over accusations that it took Neural Magic<\/a>'s \"breakthrough\" algorithms that enable AI systems to process information more quickly, U.S. District Judge Denise Casper said.
The court also allowed testimony from an expert who said Meta<\/a> owes Neural Magic as much as $766 million in royalties.
Representatives for Meta and Neural Magic did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision. The trial is currently set to begin in September.
Somerville, Massachusetts-based Neural Magic was founded by two former Massachusetts Institute of Technology researchers. Its investors include venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, VMware<\/a>, Comcast<\/a> and Verizon, according to its website.
Neural Magic sued Meta, then known as Facebook, in 2020 for allegedly stealing algorithms that enable simpler computers to run complex mathematical calculations more efficiently and allow research scientists to use larger data sets.
The lawsuit said Meta hired away a Neural Magic computer scientist, Aleksandar Zlateski, who gave the social-media giant the algorithms that make up the \"heart\" of Neural Magic's technology.
Neural Magic said Meta published the algorithms on open-source website GitHub and thanked Zlateski for solving a \"key problem for Facebook's continued advancement in the world of artificial intelligence<\/a>.\"
Meta asked the court to throw out the case last year, arguing Neural Magic had failed to identify any protectable trade secrets and that Zlateski had not acquired the information improperly. But the court on Monday allowed Neural Magic's case to continue for all but one of the 41 secrets it accused Meta of misappropriating.
Casper granted parts of Meta and Zlateski's request, rejecting Neural Magic's claims that they violated a non-competition clause or engaged in unfair business practices under Massachusetts law.
The case is Neural Magic Inc v. Meta Platforms Inc<\/a>, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 1:20-cv-10444.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":98464698,"title":"Push to give Biden new powers to ban TikTok moves ahead in Congress","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/push-to-give-biden-new-powers-to-ban-tiktok-moves-ahead-in-congress\/98464698","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":98464760,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Meta must face trial over AI trade secrets, judge says","synopsis":"Meta will have to face a trial over accusations that it took Neural Magic's \"breakthrough\" algorithms that enable AI systems to process information more quickly, U.S. District Judge Denise Casper said.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/meta-must-face-trial-over-ai-trade-secrets-judge-says","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"Reuters","artdate":"2023-03-07 08:03:38","lastupd":"2023-03-07 08:05:35","breadcrumbTags":["Meta","neural magic","vmware","comcast","Meta Platforms Inc","Meta AI","artificial intelligence","Internet","International","AI trade secrets"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/meta-must-face-trial-over-ai-trade-secrets-judge-says"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2023-03-07" data-index="article_1">
- Telecom乐动扑克News
- 2分钟阅读
元在AI商业秘密必须面临审判,法官说
元将不得不面临指控的审判,神经神奇的“突破”算法,使人工智能系统更快地处理信息,美国联邦地区法院法官丹尼斯·卡斯珀说。
元平台公司失去了报价在周一结束诉讼在波士顿联邦法院声称它从人工智能启动窃取机密信息神经的魔法公司。
元将不得不面对审判在指责它了吗神经的魔法的“突破”算法,使人工智能系统更快地处理信息,美国联邦地区法院法官丹尼斯卡斯珀说。
法院还允许一个专家说的证词元欠神经魔法多达7.66亿美元的版税。
代表元和神经魔法没有立即回复记者的置评请求的决定。目前9月开始试验。
马萨诸塞州萨默维尔市的一家神经魔术是由两个前麻省理工学院的研究人员。它的投资者包括风险资本公司Andreessen Horowitz,VMware,康卡斯特公司和Verizon,根据其网站。
神经魔法起诉元,然后被称为Facebook, 2020年因涉嫌偷窃算法,使简单的电脑更有效地运行复杂的数学计算和允许科学家使用更大的数据集。
诉讼称元聘请神经神奇的计算机科学家,亚历山大Zlateski,是谁给了社交媒体巨头算法组成的“心”神经神奇的技术。
神经魔法说元开源网站上发表的算法GitHub,感谢Zlateski解决“Facebook的关键问题持续进步的世界人工智能”。
元要求法院扔了去年的情况,认为神经魔法未能识别任何受保护商业秘密和Zlateski没有获得不当的信息。但法院周一允许神经魔法的情况下继续为所有但一个41秘密指控元盗用。
卡斯珀授予部分元Zlateski请求,拒绝神经魔法的宣称他们违反了竞业禁止条款或从事不公平的商业行为在麻萨诸塞州法律。
此案是神经魔法v . n:行情)。元平台公司马萨诸塞州的美国地方法院,1:20 - cv - 10444。
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动