独家
没有义务在厨交易,但还不清楚关于印度的立场:沃达丰
英国沃达丰集团说,它可能是“没有义务”税收修正案September-end来自印度的回顾2012年,但仍不清楚新德里将撤回挑战电信获得了较早的仲裁裁决。
英国的沃达丰集团说它可能是“没有义务”截至9月份结束来自印度的回顾税2012年修正案,但仍不清楚新德里将早期仲裁裁决撤销挑战电信赢了。
“在2021年8月,印度议会通过了新的税收立法影响2012年财政法的溯及力。这项立法在荷兰和英国的影响程序,特别是印度政府是否会撤销仲裁裁决的挑战荷兰一些是未知的,这份报告之日起,“沃达丰(Vodafone)集团在其半年业绩报告中表示。
“VIHBV (沃达丰(Vodafone)国际控股BV)和沃达丰集团将继续大力捍卫任何指控VIHBV或沃达丰印度纳税责任与事务与和记电讯国际(和记电讯国际有限公司集团)。基于这件事情的事实和情况,包括法律诉讼的结果到目前为止,该组织认为这是较有可能没有现在的义务存在于9月30日,2021年,”该公司表示。
专家表示,该公司的声明中表示,它已经与政府解决长期存在的税收争议,曾声称Rs22,000卢比的电信的不预扣税2007收购和记电讯国际的67%。按照印度的通知,公司直到11月底接受和解的提议。
知情人士表示,英国主要引发了担忧,外围税务的要求,这种要求间接转让的股份,公司希望有更多余地提供一定的事业。
“已经有很多公司包括沃达丰的事业,需要给如果他们希望解决遗留问题的间接转让股票,许多公司可能不是很舒服。同时,公司希望解决的所有税务问题起源于间接转让股票或回顾性税收和可能不想解决,除非出现这种情况,”首席执行官负责人Dinesh Kanabar, Dhruva顾问,税务咨询公司。
印度今年废除税收法案修正案于2012年通过,在新德里要求沃达丰预扣税的溯及力。的法律推翻了SC秩序支持电信的立场,没有支付税收,推动该公司在2013年寻求国际仲裁。它在2020年获得优惠的订单时,印度已在新加坡的挑战。
解决这一突出问题,印度已答应退还税款已经收集并收回所有的诉讼和仲裁。作为回报,公司必须给一个承诺,他们将在所有论坛和撤回诉讼将放弃任何损失,利息或其他费用。
沃达丰没有回应等查询周二发送。
税务专家说,2012年之后,在几个重要的国内税税务部门打了额外的几家公司被发现在间接转让股份。
消息人士称电信主要想俱乐部甚至外围税收要求的间接转移,传出的税收条款结算。
“有两党之间来回。沃达丰集团提出了担忧的某些方面改变了规则和需要澄清,”一位高管意识到政府和集团之间的发展。
“在2021年8月,印度议会通过了新的税收立法影响2012年财政法的溯及力。这项立法在荷兰和英国的影响程序,特别是印度政府是否会撤销仲裁裁决的挑战荷兰一些是未知的,这份报告之日起,“沃达丰(Vodafone)集团在其半年业绩报告中表示。
“VIHBV (沃达丰(Vodafone)国际控股BV)和沃达丰集团将继续大力捍卫任何指控VIHBV或沃达丰印度纳税责任与事务与和记电讯国际(和记电讯国际有限公司集团)。基于这件事情的事实和情况,包括法律诉讼的结果到目前为止,该组织认为这是较有可能没有现在的义务存在于9月30日,2021年,”该公司表示。
知情人士表示,英国主要引发了担忧,外围税务的要求,这种要求间接转让的股份,公司希望有更多余地提供一定的事业。
“已经有很多公司包括沃达丰的事业,需要给如果他们希望解决遗留问题的间接转让股票,许多公司可能不是很舒服。同时,公司希望解决的所有税务问题起源于间接转让股票或回顾性税收和可能不想解决,除非出现这种情况,”首席执行官负责人Dinesh Kanabar, Dhruva顾问,税务咨询公司。
印度今年废除税收法案修正案于2012年通过,在新德里要求沃达丰预扣税的溯及力。的法律推翻了SC秩序支持电信的立场,没有支付税收,推动该公司在2013年寻求国际仲裁。它在2020年获得优惠的订单时,印度已在新加坡的挑战。
新加坡法院一直印度税务纠纷诉讼在荷兰:沃达丰
VIHBV和沃达丰集团股价将继续大力捍卫任何指控VIHBV或沃达丰印度纳税责任与和记电讯国际事务,“沃达丰集团周二说一半的年度收益报告。
解决这一突出问题,印度已答应退还税款已经收集并收回所有的诉讼和仲裁。作为回报,公司必须给一个承诺,他们将在所有论坛和撤回诉讼将放弃任何损失,利息或其他费用。
沃达丰没有回应等查询周二发送。
税务专家说,2012年之后,在几个重要的国内税税务部门打了额外的几家公司被发现在间接转让股份。
消息人士称电信主要想俱乐部甚至外围税收要求的间接转移,传出的税收条款结算。
“有两党之间来回。沃达丰集团提出了担忧的某些方面改变了规则和需要澄清,”一位高管意识到政府和集团之间的发展。
UK\u2019s Vodafone Group<\/a> has said it is likely that it has \u201cno present obligation\u201d as of September end from India\u2019s retrospective tax<\/a> amendment in 2012, but is still unclear whether New Delhi<\/a> will withdraw its challenge to an earlier arbitration award the telco had won.
\"In August 2021, the Indian Parliament passed new tax legislation which affects the retrospective effect of the Finance Act 2012. The impact of this legislation on the Dutch and UK BIT proceedings, in particular whether the Indian government will withdraw its challenge to the arbitration award in the Dutch BIT<\/a>, is unknown as of the date of this report, \" Vodafone<\/a> Group said in its half-yearly earnings report.
\"VIHBV (Vodafone International Holdings BV<\/a>) and Vodafone Group Plc will continue to vigorously defend any allegation that VIHBV or Vodafone India is liable to pay tax in connection with the transaction with HTIL (Hutchison Telecommunications International Limited group). Based on the facts and circumstances of this matter, including the outcome of legal proceedings to date, the Group considers that it is more likely than not that no present obligation exists on September 30, 2021,\" the company said.
\"In August 2021, the Indian Parliament passed new tax legislation which affects the retrospective effect of the Finance Act 2012. The impact of this legislation on the Dutch and UK BIT proceedings, in particular whether the Indian government will withdraw its challenge to the arbitration award in the Dutch BIT<\/a>, is unknown as of the date of this report, \" Vodafone<\/a> Group said in its half-yearly earnings report.
\"VIHBV (Vodafone International Holdings BV<\/a>) and Vodafone Group Plc will continue to vigorously defend any allegation that VIHBV or Vodafone India is liable to pay tax in connection with the transaction with HTIL (Hutchison Telecommunications International Limited group). Based on the facts and circumstances of this matter, including the outcome of legal proceedings to date, the Group considers that it is more likely than not that no present obligation exists on September 30, 2021,\" the company said.
<\/div><\/div>Experts said that the company\u2019s statement indicated that it has yet to settle the long-standing tax dispute with the government, which had claimed Rs22,000 crore from the telco for not withholding taxes on its 2007 deal to buy 67% in HTIL. As per India\u2019s notification, the company has until end of November to accept the settlement proposal.
People close to the development said that the UK major has raised concerns around peripheral tax demands that emanated from the indirect transfer of shares, and the company wants more wriggle room for providing certain undertakings.
\"There have been a lot of undertakings that companies including Vodafone, are required to give if they wish to settle the legacy issues on the indirect transfer of shares and many companies may not be very comfortable with this. Also, companies want to settle all the tax issues that emanated from the indirect transfer of shares or retrospective tax and may not want to settle unless that happens,\" said Dinesh Kanabar, CEO, Dhruva Advisors, a tax advisory firm.
India this year brought a bill to repeal the tax amendment passed in 2012, under which New Delhi demanded withholding taxes from Vodafone with retrospective effect. The law overturned an SC order which had backed the telco\u2019s stance that no tax was payable, pushing the company to seek international arbitration in 2013. It won a favourable order in 2020, which India has challenged in Singapore.
People close to the development said that the UK major has raised concerns around peripheral tax demands that emanated from the indirect transfer of shares, and the company wants more wriggle room for providing certain undertakings.
\"There have been a lot of undertakings that companies including Vodafone, are required to give if they wish to settle the legacy issues on the indirect transfer of shares and many companies may not be very comfortable with this. Also, companies want to settle all the tax issues that emanated from the indirect transfer of shares or retrospective tax and may not want to settle unless that happens,\" said Dinesh Kanabar, CEO, Dhruva Advisors, a tax advisory firm.
India this year brought a bill to repeal the tax amendment passed in 2012, under which New Delhi demanded withholding taxes from Vodafone with retrospective effect. The law overturned an SC order which had backed the telco\u2019s stance that no tax was payable, pushing the company to seek international arbitration in 2013. It won a favourable order in 2020, which India has challenged in Singapore.
<\/div><\/div>![\"No](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/figure>
<\/figure>