Broadband India Forum<\/a> (BIF<\/a>) has asserted that Over-The-Top (OTT<\/a>) communications service should be excluded from the elements mentioned in the definition of telecommunication services, as the industry<\/a> body gave its submissions on the draft telecom bill<\/a>. BIF said many strong and substantive reasons sharply differentiate OTTs from telecommunications<\/a>. ”把奥特在电信许可的范围下,只将意味着政府将持有和拥有独家权利和特权来决定,构建、开发和经营奥特的应用。这种情况将严重模糊的和高度不切实际,导致整个应用生态系统的崩溃,从而影响经济的创新和增长,”BIF说在最近向政府提交的草案。 宽带印度论坛(BIF)断言,言过其实的(奥特)通信服务应该排除在元素中提到的电信服务的定义,作为行业身体给了它对草案提交电信法案。BIF说大幅奥特有别于许多强有力的和实质性的原因电信。
\"By bringing the OTTs under the ambit of the telecom license, would mean that the government would only hold and have exclusive rights and privileges to decide, build, develop and operate the OTT apps. Such a situation would be grossly ambiguous and highly impractical and lead to a collapse of the entire app ecosystem, thereby impacting innovation and growth of the economy,\" BIF said in its recent submission to the government on the draft bill.
The draft bill includes OTT communication services, even though such players have no telecommunication network<\/a>, BIF argued.
It mooted that sectors other than telecommunication, such as broadcasting and OTT communications<\/a> (or having any other nomenclature instead of OTT Communications) cannot be in the ambit of the draft bill.
\"OTT Communications\/OTTs are essentially apps and not telecommunication services, and like any app, they use the internet, and they do not own or work a telegraph\/telecommunication network,\" it contended.
BIF noted there were some arguments claiming that OTT communications should be brought under the purview of the draft bill, and went on to add that \"such contentions are not correct, both under law and policy\".
\"Further such contentions may be driven by commercial objectives,\" the forum added.
According to the forum, the commercial argument that OTT is a free-riding service is \"neither correct nor is relevant\" in the current context.
OTT service providers and users pay TSPs (Telecom Service Providers) for network usage costs. Moreover, the business models of OTTs and TSPs are very different and OTT never bypasses and simply cannot bypass the broadband\/telecom infrastructure to provide the OTT services to its users, it said.
\"It is respectfully submitted that OTT communications service should be excluded from elements in the definition of telecommunication services in the Draft Bill,\" BIF added.
On spectrum management, the industry think-tank said that the satellite spectrum should continue to be administratively allocated.<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":95667855,"title":"Meta announces additional safety measures for children and teenagers","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/meta-announces-additional-safety-measures-for-children-and-teenagers\/95667855","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"95667943","title":"telecom Bill","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"tech\/technology\/ott-communications-service-should-be-excluded-from-ambit-of-definition-of-telecom-services-bif-on-draft-telecom-bill\/telecom-bill","category_name":"OTT communications service should be excluded from ambit of definition of telecom services: BIF on draft telecom Bill","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-989295\/95667943.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/tech\/technology\/ott-communications-service-should-be-excluded-from-ambit-of-definition-of-telecom-services-bif-on-draft-telecom-bill\/telecom-bill\/95667943"}],"msid":95668093,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"OTT communications service should be excluded from ambit of definition of telecom services: BIF on draft telecom Bill","synopsis":"\"By bringing the OTTs under the ambit of the telecom license, would mean that the government would only hold and have exclusive rights and privileges to decide, build, develop and operate the OTT apps. Such a situation would be grossly ambiguous and highly impractical and lead to a collapse of the entire app ecosystem, thereby impacting innovation and growth of the economy,\" BIF said in its recent submission to the government on the draft bill.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/ott-communications-service-should-be-excluded-from-ambit-of-definition-of-telecom-services-bif-on-draft-telecom-bill","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":154,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":760000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"PTI","artdate":"2022-11-21 21:38:12","lastupd":"2022-11-21 21:42:38","breadcrumbTags":["ott communications","bif","india forum","OTT","telecom bill","telecommunications","telecommunication network","industry","ott platforms"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/ott-communications-service-should-be-excluded-from-ambit-of-definition-of-telecom-services-bif-on-draft-telecom-bill"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2022-11-21" data-index="article_1">
奥特通信服务应该排除在范围的电信服务的定义:在电信法案草案BIF
”把奥特在电信许可的范围下,只将意味着政府将持有和拥有独家权利和特权来决定,构建、开发和经营奥特的应用。这种情况将严重模糊的和高度不切实际,导致整个应用生态系统的崩溃,从而影响经济的创新和增长,”BIF说在最近向政府提交的草案。
提出电信以外的领域,比如广播奥特通信(或任何其他术语而不是奥特通信)不能在草案的范围。
“奥特通信/奥特本质上是应用程序而不是电信服务,与任何应用程序一样,他们使用互联网,他们并不拥有或工作电报/电信网络,“争用。
BIF指出有一些观点声称应使奥特通信范围下的草案,并补充说,“这样的论点是不正确的,在法律和政策”。
“进一步的商业目标,这样的竞争可能是由“论坛补充道。
根据论坛,奥特是一个搭便车服务的商业观点是“既不正确也不相关”在当前的上下文。
奥特服务提供商和用户支付茶匙(电信服务提供商)对网络的使用成本。此外,奥特的商业模式和茶匙非常不同,奥特从不绕过,不能绕过宽带/电信基础设施提供奥特服务用户,它说。
“很恭敬地提交,奥特通信服务应该排除在元素在草案的电信服务的定义,“BIF补充道。
频谱管理、产业智库表示,卫星光谱应该继续管理分配。
读到
Broadband India Forum<\/a> (BIF<\/a>) has asserted that Over-The-Top (OTT<\/a>) communications service should be excluded from the elements mentioned in the definition of telecommunication services, as the industry<\/a> body gave its submissions on the draft telecom bill<\/a>. BIF said many strong and substantive reasons sharply differentiate OTTs from telecommunications<\/a>.
\"By bringing the OTTs under the ambit of the telecom license, would mean that the government would only hold and have exclusive rights and privileges to decide, build, develop and operate the OTT apps. Such a situation would be grossly ambiguous and highly impractical and lead to a collapse of the entire app ecosystem, thereby impacting innovation and growth of the economy,\" BIF said in its recent submission to the government on the draft bill.
The draft bill includes OTT communication services, even though such players have no telecommunication network<\/a>, BIF argued.
It mooted that sectors other than telecommunication, such as broadcasting and OTT communications<\/a> (or having any other nomenclature instead of OTT Communications) cannot be in the ambit of the draft bill.
\"OTT Communications\/OTTs are essentially apps and not telecommunication services, and like any app, they use the internet, and they do not own or work a telegraph\/telecommunication network,\" it contended.
BIF noted there were some arguments claiming that OTT communications should be brought under the purview of the draft bill, and went on to add that \"such contentions are not correct, both under law and policy\".
\"Further such contentions may be driven by commercial objectives,\" the forum added.
According to the forum, the commercial argument that OTT is a free-riding service is \"neither correct nor is relevant\" in the current context.
OTT service providers and users pay TSPs (Telecom Service Providers) for network usage costs. Moreover, the business models of OTTs and TSPs are very different and OTT never bypasses and simply cannot bypass the broadband\/telecom infrastructure to provide the OTT services to its users, it said.
\"It is respectfully submitted that OTT communications service should be excluded from elements in the definition of telecommunication services in the Draft Bill,\" BIF added.
On spectrum management, the industry think-tank said that the satellite spectrum should continue to be administratively allocated.<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":95667855,"title":"Meta announces additional safety measures for children and teenagers","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/meta-announces-additional-safety-measures-for-children-and-teenagers\/95667855","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"95667943","title":"telecom Bill","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"tech\/technology\/ott-communications-service-should-be-excluded-from-ambit-of-definition-of-telecom-services-bif-on-draft-telecom-bill\/telecom-bill","category_name":"OTT communications service should be excluded from ambit of definition of telecom services: BIF on draft telecom Bill","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-989295\/95667943.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/tech\/technology\/ott-communications-service-should-be-excluded-from-ambit-of-definition-of-telecom-services-bif-on-draft-telecom-bill\/telecom-bill\/95667943"}],"msid":95668093,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"OTT communications service should be excluded from ambit of definition of telecom services: BIF on draft telecom Bill","synopsis":"\"By bringing the OTTs under the ambit of the telecom license, would mean that the government would only hold and have exclusive rights and privileges to decide, build, develop and operate the OTT apps. Such a situation would be grossly ambiguous and highly impractical and lead to a collapse of the entire app ecosystem, thereby impacting innovation and growth of the economy,\" BIF said in its recent submission to the government on the draft bill.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/ott-communications-service-should-be-excluded-from-ambit-of-definition-of-telecom-services-bif-on-draft-telecom-bill","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":154,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":760000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"PTI","artdate":"2022-11-21 21:38:12","lastupd":"2022-11-21 21:42:38","breadcrumbTags":["ott communications","bif","india forum","OTT","telecom bill","telecommunications","telecommunication network","industry","ott platforms"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/ott-communications-service-should-be-excluded-from-ambit-of-definition-of-telecom-services-bif-on-draft-telecom-bill"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/ott-communications-service-should-be-excluded-from-ambit-of-definition-of-telecom-services-bif-on-draft-telecom-bill/95668093">
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动