X

我们使用cookie,以确保适合你的经验

我们用饼干和其他跟踪技术来提高你的浏览体验在我们的网站上,显示个性化内容和有针对性的广告,分析网站流量,并理解我们的观众来自哪里。你也可以阅读我们的隐私政策,我们使用cookie来确保你在我们的网站上的最好的体验。

选择我接受,或继续在网站上,你同意我们使用饼干和条款和条件。

得到应用
\"\"NEW DELHI: Special CBI Judge OP Saini, who acquitted all the accused in cases related to the 2G scam<\/a>, expressed strong disapproval over the conduct of two top officials — Pulok Chatterjee<\/a> and TKA Nair<\/a> — in the Prime Minister’s Office for presenting what the court described as an “incomplete view” to the then PM Manmohan Singh<\/a>.
\n
The court said the two officials had not fully disclosed the contents of three letters written by the then telecom minister A Raja<\/a> to the former PM about matters related to the first-come, first-served policy.
\n
A note put up for the PM on January 7, 2008, mentioned changes in the policy regarding allotment of licences. The note said licences would be handed to whoever paid first. But the note kept silent about the fact that new licences were also being granted, according to the judgement. The court thus noted that the PMO<\/a> officials represented “only a partial view” of Raja’s letters to the PM.
\n
\n“It was not Raja, but Pulok Chatterjee, in consultation with TKA Nair, as he had suppressed the most relevant and controversial part of the letter of A Raja from the then hon’ble PM,” the judgement reads. “Pulok Chatterjee ought to have taken note of these facts in his earlier note dated January 6, 2008, itself, but he did not do so for reasons best known to him and placed only a partial view before the then hon’ble PM.”
\n
\n 3 Letters to Singh<\/strong>
\n
\n“It is clear from the record of the case that issue of LOIs and grant of UAS licence by changed criteria was creating controversy in the country leading to the registration of the instant case. A Raja had justified the changed criteria, as referred to above, but this important issue was not placed before the then hon’ble PM at the right time. This was done only when the controversy broke out after issue of LOIs on January 10, 2008,” Judge Saini added.
\n
\nRaja wrote three letters to Singh between November and December 2007, explaining changes that he proposed to make in the policy of first-come, first-served.
\n
\nSingh, as per the ruling, got to know about the controversy over new licences only after they were granted on January 10, 2008. Singh had said on that day that he wanted “this informally shared with the department. Does not want a formal communication and wants PMO to be at arm’s length”.
\n
\nThe judge said, “If the words ‘wants PMO to be at arm’s length’ are read in the context of the case, it is clear that they are aimed at officials of the PMO and not at A Raja. Why? Because whatever A Raja intended to do relating to telecom licences was conveyed by him to the then hon’ble prime minister in his letter.”
\n
\nNair on Thursday denied any wrongdoing. “This is not correct. I will not comment further. I have not seen the judgement,” Nair said. Pulok Chatterjee did not respond to calls and text messages seeking comment.
\n
\nThe court’s findings are significant because the crux of Raja’s defence has always been that he had kept Singh in the loop about proposed changes in the allotment of licences and spectrum.<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":62203292,"title":"2G scam case: 2G scam is dead, long live the scam - Opinion","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/2g-scam-case-2g-scam-is-dead-long-live-the-scam\/62203292","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":62203335,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"PMO men Chatterjee and Nair suppressed Raja letter: Judge","synopsis":"The court said the two officials had not fully disclosed the contents of three letters written by the then telecom minister A Raja to the former PM about matters related to the first-come, first-served policy.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/pmo-men-chatterjee-and-nair-suppressed-raja-letter-judge","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2017-12-22 09:55:54","lastupd":"2017-12-22 10:00:57","breadcrumbTags":["Pulok Chatterjee","PMO","2G scam","A Raja","Manmohan Singh","TKA Nair","industey"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/pmo-men-chatterjee-and-nair-suppressed-raja-letter-judge"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2017-12-22" data-index="article_1">

PMO男人Chatterjee和Nair抑制拉信:法官

法院表示,两名官员未完全披露的内容写的三个字母然后电信部长拉贾前相关点事情先购票政策。

  • 2017年12月22日更新是早上10点的时间
新德里:特殊CBI法官OP赛,他无罪释放的所有指控案件有关2 g的骗局,对两个高级官员的行为表示强烈的反对Pulok Chatterjee和TKA Nair——在总理办公室提供法庭描述为一个“不完整的视图”然后点曼莫汉•辛格(Manmohan Singh)。

法院表示,两名官员未完全披露的内容写的三个字母然后电信部长一个拉贾前相关点事情先购票政策。

注意把1月7日下午,2008年,提到关于许可证的分配政策的变化。注意说牌照将交给谁先支付。但是,注意保持沉默,新执照也被授予,根据判断。法院因此指出PMO官员表示“只有部分视图”点拉贾的书信。

“不是拉,但Pulok Chatterjee,会商TKA Nair他镇压最相关和有争议的部分的拉贾的信鸿'ble点,“判断读取。“Pulok Chatterjee应该注意到这些事实在他注意日期为1月6日早些时候,2008年,本身,但他没有这样做,对他最著名的原因,只有一个部分视图之前然后鸿'ble点。”

3字母辛格

“很明显从路易斯的记录,问题和无人机许可证的授予改变标准是创建国家的争议导致即时登记情况。拉贾已合理改变标准,正如上面提到的,但这一重要问题不是放置在鸿'ble点在正确的时间。这样做是只有当路易斯的争议爆发后问题1月10日,2008年,”法官赛尼补充道。

拉辛格写了三封信,2007年11月和12月之间,解释政策的变化,他提议先购票。

辛格,根据裁决,要知道争议新牌照后只获得了1月10日2008年。那天辛格曾表示,他希望“这个非正式地与部门共享。不希望一个正式的沟通和希望PMO距离”。

法官说:“如果这句话‘希望PMO距离读取上下文的情况下,很明显,他们是在PMO的官员,而不是针对拉贾。为什么?因为无论拉打算做有关电信牌照是由他转达了鸿'ble首相他信。”

Nair周四否认有任何违法行为。“这是不正确的。我不会进一步置评。我没有见过的判断,”Nair说。Pulok Chatterjee没有回应记者的置评的电话和短信。

法院的发现意义重大,因为拉贾的关键的国防一直是辛格,他一直在循环提出许可证的分配和频谱的变化。
  • 发布于2017年12月22日09:55点坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

评论

现在评论 阅读评论(1)

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
\"\"NEW DELHI: Special CBI Judge OP Saini, who acquitted all the accused in cases related to the 2G scam<\/a>, expressed strong disapproval over the conduct of two top officials — Pulok Chatterjee<\/a> and TKA Nair<\/a> — in the Prime Minister’s Office for presenting what the court described as an “incomplete view” to the then PM Manmohan Singh<\/a>.
\n
The court said the two officials had not fully disclosed the contents of three letters written by the then telecom minister A Raja<\/a> to the former PM about matters related to the first-come, first-served policy.
\n
A note put up for the PM on January 7, 2008, mentioned changes in the policy regarding allotment of licences. The note said licences would be handed to whoever paid first. But the note kept silent about the fact that new licences were also being granted, according to the judgement. The court thus noted that the PMO<\/a> officials represented “only a partial view” of Raja’s letters to the PM.
\n
\n“It was not Raja, but Pulok Chatterjee, in consultation with TKA Nair, as he had suppressed the most relevant and controversial part of the letter of A Raja from the then hon’ble PM,” the judgement reads. “Pulok Chatterjee ought to have taken note of these facts in his earlier note dated January 6, 2008, itself, but he did not do so for reasons best known to him and placed only a partial view before the then hon’ble PM.”
\n
\n 3 Letters to Singh<\/strong>
\n
\n“It is clear from the record of the case that issue of LOIs and grant of UAS licence by changed criteria was creating controversy in the country leading to the registration of the instant case. A Raja had justified the changed criteria, as referred to above, but this important issue was not placed before the then hon’ble PM at the right time. This was done only when the controversy broke out after issue of LOIs on January 10, 2008,” Judge Saini added.
\n
\nRaja wrote three letters to Singh between November and December 2007, explaining changes that he proposed to make in the policy of first-come, first-served.
\n
\nSingh, as per the ruling, got to know about the controversy over new licences only after they were granted on January 10, 2008. Singh had said on that day that he wanted “this informally shared with the department. Does not want a formal communication and wants PMO to be at arm’s length”.
\n
\nThe judge said, “If the words ‘wants PMO to be at arm’s length’ are read in the context of the case, it is clear that they are aimed at officials of the PMO and not at A Raja. Why? Because whatever A Raja intended to do relating to telecom licences was conveyed by him to the then hon’ble prime minister in his letter.”
\n
\nNair on Thursday denied any wrongdoing. “This is not correct. I will not comment further. I have not seen the judgement,” Nair said. Pulok Chatterjee did not respond to calls and text messages seeking comment.
\n
\nThe court’s findings are significant because the crux of Raja’s defence has always been that he had kept Singh in the loop about proposed changes in the allotment of licences and spectrum.<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":62203292,"title":"2G scam case: 2G scam is dead, long live the scam - Opinion","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/2g-scam-case-2g-scam-is-dead-long-live-the-scam\/62203292","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":62203335,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"PMO men Chatterjee and Nair suppressed Raja letter: Judge","synopsis":"The court said the two officials had not fully disclosed the contents of three letters written by the then telecom minister A Raja to the former PM about matters related to the first-come, first-served policy.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/pmo-men-chatterjee-and-nair-suppressed-raja-letter-judge","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2017-12-22 09:55:54","lastupd":"2017-12-22 10:00:57","breadcrumbTags":["Pulok Chatterjee","PMO","2G scam","A Raja","Manmohan Singh","TKA Nair","industey"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/pmo-men-chatterjee-and-nair-suppressed-raja-letter-judge"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/pmo-men-chatterjee-and-nair-suppressed-raja-letter-judge/62203335">