X

我们使用cookie,以确保适合你的经验

我们用饼干和其他跟踪技术来提高你的浏览体验在我们的网站上,显示个性化内容和有针对性的广告,分析网站流量,并理解我们的观众来自哪里。你也可以阅读我们的隐私政策,我们使用cookie来确保你在我们的网站上的最好的体验。

选择我接受,或继续在网站上,你同意我们使用饼干和条款和条件。

得到应用
\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure> New Delhi: State-run transmission utility Power Grid Corporation on Friday said it has filed an application before Supreme Court against Department of Telecom's demand of around Rs 22,000 crore in past dues, saying its revenue from telecom business was only 2 per cent of its turnover. Following the October 24 Supreme Court ruling that non-telecom revenues of telecom firms such as Bharti Airtel<\/a> and Vodafone Idea should be included for considering payments of government dues, the telecom department (DoT) sought additional license fee from non-telecom firms also.

The DoT had sought additional license fee of Rs 1.72 lakh crore from gas utility GAIL India Ltd, Rs 48,000 crore from OIL, around Rs 22,000 crore from Power Grid Corporation (PowerGrid<\/a>), and has raised similar demands from RailTel and other public sector undertakings (PSUs).

\"On 23rd January 2020, POWERGRID has filed an application before the Hon'ble Supreme Court for clarification\/modification of its order on 24th October 2019 and next course of action will be based on the outcome of the application,\" PowerGrid said in a statement.

The company pointed out, \"Non-Telecom revenue of Power Grid i.e. power transmission and its related consultancy business constitutes 98 per cent of revenue whereas revenue from telecom segment is only about 2 per cent.\"

It also claimed that PowerGrid is National Long distance (NLD) and Internet Service Provider (ISP) licensee and is regularly paying the applicable license fee on Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) to DoT in line with terms & conditions of respective license agreements and have also been assessed by DoT up to 2013-14.

The company said that DoT has done provisional assessments for 2014-15 to 2017-18 and also reassessed for 2012-13 and 2013-14 and raised additional demand to the tune of Rs 21,954 crore in the past one year by addition of non-telecom revenue as miscellaneous income in AGR.

PowerGrid has contested the demands before DoT and requested for its withdrawal, as the definition of AGR under NLD and ISP license agreements does not include such non-telecom revenue, it said.

Moreover, it said that the DoT recently completed the assessment of NLD and ISP licenses for 2018-19 without addition of miscellaneous income and in fact assessed a refund to PowerGrid.

The dispute, regarding interpretation of AGR pending before the Supreme Court, was between DoT and Telecom Service Operators (TSPs), who were holding Unified Access Service License (UASL) and migrated from National Telecom Policy (NTP)-1994 to NTP-1999, it said.

The recent judgment on October 24, 2019, of the Supreme Court, is not applicable\/binding on PowerGrid as it was not licensee prior to 2001 and never held UASL, it added.

Further, it also said that the definition of AGR as per NLD and ISP license agreements as well as nature of limited telecom activity of PowerGrid is completely different and distinct from that relating to the TSPs, which were before the Supreme Court.<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":73590634,"title":"Smartphone growth slows to 7% in 2019: Counterpoint","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/smartphone-growth-slows-to-7-in-2019-counterpoint\/73590634","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":73590871,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"PowerGrid moves SC against DoT demand of Rs 22K Cr","synopsis":"The company pointed out, \"Non-Telecom revenue of Power Grid i.e.power transmission and its related consultancy business constitutes 98 per cent of revenue whereas revenue from telecom segment is only about 2 per cent.\".","titleseo":"telecomnews\/powergrid-moves-sc-against-dot-demand-of-rs-22k-cr","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"PTI","artdate":"2020-01-24 21:28:49","lastupd":"2020-01-24 21:31:02","breadcrumbTags":["PowerGrid","Industry","RailTel Corporation of India","bharti airtel","Power Grid Corporation of India"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/powergrid-moves-sc-against-dot-demand-of-rs-22k-cr"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2020-01-24" data-index="article_1">

国家电网公司SC移动对需求点的Rs 22 k Cr

该公司指出,“Non-Telecom电网即收入。电力传输及其相关咨询业务构成了98%的收入,而收入来自电信部分只有2%。”。

  • 更新2020年1月24日09:31点坚持
新德里:国营传输公用电网公司周五说,已经提交了申请在最高法院对电信部门的需求约22000卢比在过去的会费,称其电信业务收入只占其营业额的2%。在10月24日最高法院裁定non-telecom等电信公司的收入Bharti Airtel和沃达丰的想法应该包括政府考虑支付会费,电信部门(点)从non-telecom公司也寻求额外的许可费用。

的点寻求额外的许可费用1.72十万的卢比从天然气公用事业盖尔印度有限公司从石油48000卢比,大约22000卢比从电网公司(国家电网公司),并提出了类似要求RailTel和其他公共部门的事业(电源)。

广告
“2020年1月23日,国家电网公司提出申请之前,鸿'ble最高法院澄清/修改的订单在2019年10月24日和明年的行动将基于应用程序的结果,“国家电网公司在一份声明中说。

公司指出,“Non-Telecom电网即电力传输的收入及其相关咨询业务构成了98%的收入,而收入来自电信部门只有2%。”

它还称,国家电网公司是国家长途(民盟)和互联网服务提供商(ISP)被许可方和定期支付适用的许可费用调整后总收入(AGR)点符合本许可协议的条款和条件,也被点到2013 - 14评估。

公司说点做了临时评估2014 - 15 - 2017 - 18也重新评估2012 - 13 - 2013 - 14和提出更多需求的21954卢比在过去一年通过添加non-telecom收入AGR的杂项收入。

国家电网公司之前有争议的需求点和要求撤军,AGR的定义在民盟和ISP许可协议不包括non-telecom收入等。

此外,它说,民盟的点最近完成了评估和ISP执照2018 - 19不增加杂项收入事实上评估向国家电网公司提供退款。

广告
纠纷,对于解释AGR等待最高法院之前,是点和电信服务运营商之间(茶匙),拿着统一访问服务许可证(UASL)和从国家电信政策(国家结核控制规划)-1994年至1999年国家结核控制规划,它说。

最近的判决在2019年10月24日,最高法院,不适用/绑定在国家电网公司不被许可方在2001年之前,从不UASL举行,它补充说。

此外,它还说,AGR的定义根据民盟和ISP许可协议以及有限的国家电网公司电信活动的本质是完全不同的,不同于有关茶匙,在最高法院。
  • 发表在2020年1月24日09:28点坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

评论

现在评论 阅读评论(1)

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure> New Delhi: State-run transmission utility Power Grid Corporation on Friday said it has filed an application before Supreme Court against Department of Telecom's demand of around Rs 22,000 crore in past dues, saying its revenue from telecom business was only 2 per cent of its turnover. Following the October 24 Supreme Court ruling that non-telecom revenues of telecom firms such as Bharti Airtel<\/a> and Vodafone Idea should be included for considering payments of government dues, the telecom department (DoT) sought additional license fee from non-telecom firms also.

The DoT had sought additional license fee of Rs 1.72 lakh crore from gas utility GAIL India Ltd, Rs 48,000 crore from OIL, around Rs 22,000 crore from Power Grid Corporation (PowerGrid<\/a>), and has raised similar demands from RailTel and other public sector undertakings (PSUs).

\"On 23rd January 2020, POWERGRID has filed an application before the Hon'ble Supreme Court for clarification\/modification of its order on 24th October 2019 and next course of action will be based on the outcome of the application,\" PowerGrid said in a statement.

The company pointed out, \"Non-Telecom revenue of Power Grid i.e. power transmission and its related consultancy business constitutes 98 per cent of revenue whereas revenue from telecom segment is only about 2 per cent.\"

It also claimed that PowerGrid is National Long distance (NLD) and Internet Service Provider (ISP) licensee and is regularly paying the applicable license fee on Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) to DoT in line with terms & conditions of respective license agreements and have also been assessed by DoT up to 2013-14.

The company said that DoT has done provisional assessments for 2014-15 to 2017-18 and also reassessed for 2012-13 and 2013-14 and raised additional demand to the tune of Rs 21,954 crore in the past one year by addition of non-telecom revenue as miscellaneous income in AGR.

PowerGrid has contested the demands before DoT and requested for its withdrawal, as the definition of AGR under NLD and ISP license agreements does not include such non-telecom revenue, it said.

Moreover, it said that the DoT recently completed the assessment of NLD and ISP licenses for 2018-19 without addition of miscellaneous income and in fact assessed a refund to PowerGrid.

The dispute, regarding interpretation of AGR pending before the Supreme Court, was between DoT and Telecom Service Operators (TSPs), who were holding Unified Access Service License (UASL) and migrated from National Telecom Policy (NTP)-1994 to NTP-1999, it said.

The recent judgment on October 24, 2019, of the Supreme Court, is not applicable\/binding on PowerGrid as it was not licensee prior to 2001 and never held UASL, it added.

Further, it also said that the definition of AGR as per NLD and ISP license agreements as well as nature of limited telecom activity of PowerGrid is completely different and distinct from that relating to the TSPs, which were before the Supreme Court.<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":73590634,"title":"Smartphone growth slows to 7% in 2019: Counterpoint","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/smartphone-growth-slows-to-7-in-2019-counterpoint\/73590634","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":73590871,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"PowerGrid moves SC against DoT demand of Rs 22K Cr","synopsis":"The company pointed out, \"Non-Telecom revenue of Power Grid i.e.power transmission and its related consultancy business constitutes 98 per cent of revenue whereas revenue from telecom segment is only about 2 per cent.\".","titleseo":"telecomnews\/powergrid-moves-sc-against-dot-demand-of-rs-22k-cr","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"PTI","artdate":"2020-01-24 21:28:49","lastupd":"2020-01-24 21:31:02","breadcrumbTags":["PowerGrid","Industry","RailTel Corporation of India","bharti airtel","Power Grid Corporation of India"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/powergrid-moves-sc-against-dot-demand-of-rs-22k-cr"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/powergrid-moves-sc-against-dot-demand-of-rs-22k-cr/73590871">