\n\t\"We understand that progress in the case (trial) has not been made and we would hear whether to continue with the interim order or not,\" a bench of justices H L Dattu and K S Radhakrishnan said.<\/p>\n
\n\tThe bench adjourned the case as Mittal's counsel Harish Salve was not available for arguments as he was making submissions in another case.<\/p>\n
\n\tCBI had started preliminary inquiry into Aircel-Maxis deal on January 4, 2011 and nine months later on October 9 had registered the FIR.<\/p>\n
The CBI had told the apex court in September last year that it has completed its probe against former Telecom Minister Dayanidhi Maran<\/a> in the case. It had in July, 2011, placed a status report in the court stating that during 2004-07 when Maran was telecom minister, Sivasankaran was coerced to sell the stake in Aircel<\/a> to Maxis Group<\/a>.<\/p>\n \n\tThe trial proceedings against Mittal and Ruia were stayed by the apex through an interim order on April 8 last year. They had approached the apex court challenging special court's order summoning them as accused despite CBI not naming them as accused in its charge sheet.<\/p>\n \n\tWhile summoning Mittal, Asim Ghosh, MD of Hutchison Max Telecom Pvt Ltd and Ravi Ruia, a Director in Sterling Cellular Ltd, the special court had said that they were \"prima facie\" in \"control of affairs\" of their companies, named in the charge sheet by CBI in the case.<\/p>\n CBI had filed the charge sheet on December 21, 2012 against former Telecom Secretary Shyamal Ghosh<\/a> and three telecom firms -- Bharti Cellular Ltd, Hutchison Max Telecom Pvt Ltd (now known as Vodafone India Ltd<\/a>) and Sterling Cellular Ltd (now known as Vodafone Mobile Service Ltd). They all were also summoned for April 11 by the court.<\/p>\n The CBI, in its charge sheet, had named the three telecom companies as accused in the case in which the Department of Telecommunications<\/a> had allocated additional spectrum which had allegedly resulted in a loss of Rs 846 crore to the exchequer. AAC RKS VMN<\/p>\n\n<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":34122407,"title":"HTC clarifies not eyeing Nokia India plant","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/industry\/htc-clarifies-not-eyeing-nokia-india-plant\/34122407","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"industry"}],"related_content":[],"msid":34124199,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"SC directs CBI, ED to file status report on Aircel-Maxis deal","synopsis":"The bench adjourned the case as Mittal's counsel Harish Salve was not available for arguments as he was making submissions in another case.","titleseo":"industry\/sc-directs-cbi-ed-to-file-status-report-on-aircel-maxis-deal","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"PTI","artdate":"2014-04-23 22:03:15","lastupd":"2014-04-23 22:05:33","breadcrumbTags":["CBI","Aircel","Maxis Group","Mittal Asim Ghosh","industry","Department of Telecommunications","Shyamal Ghosh","Vodafone India Ltd","Dayanidhi Maran"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"industry\/sc-directs-cbi-ed-to-file-status-report-on-aircel-maxis-deal"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="Industry" data-category_id="18" data-date="2014-04-23" data-index="article_1">
“我们知道进展情况(试行)没有,我们会听到与临时订单是否继续与否,“法官的长椅上H L Dattu和K S Radhakrishnan说。 板凳休会的米塔尔的法律顾问哈瑞药膏并不是可用的参数作为他提交的另一个例子。 CBI已经开始初步调查Aircel-Maxis交易1月4日,2011年,九个月后10月9日注册了冷杉。 英国工业联合会去年9月曾告诉法院,对前电信部长完成了调查供词在这个案子。它在2011年7月,在法庭上放置一个状态报告说,在2004 - 07年马兰电信部长的时候,Sivasankaran强迫出售股份Aircel来Maxis集团。 审判程序对米塔尔和鲁雅呆了顶点通过临时订单去年4月8日。他们已经接近顶点法院挑战特别法庭的秩序召唤他们指责尽管CBI没有指控的案件记录命名。 虽然召唤米塔尔,Asim Ghosh博士和记马克斯•电信Pvt Ltd .)和拉维·鲁雅英镑细胞有限公司董事,特别法庭曾表示,他们“初步”“控制事务”的公司,名叫CBI负责表的情况。 CBI提交了费用表12月21日2012前电信部长Shyamal Ghosh和三家电信公司——Bharti细胞有限公司和记黄埔电信Pvt Ltd(现在称为马克斯沃达丰印度有限公司)和英镑细胞(现在被称为沃达丰移动服务有限公司)。他们都被法院也为4月11日召见。 英国工业联合会,在其表,命名了三家电信公司指控的案件电信部有额外的频谱分配据称导致损失846卢比的财政大臣。AAC地基VMN
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动