The US Justice Department on Monday charged Chinese telecom giant Huawei<\/a> and its CFO Meng Wanzhou<\/a> — currently under the watch of law enforcers in Canada after being arrested at the behest of the US — for trade and financial violations and attempt to steal intellectual property. The indictment escalated the pressure on the Chinese company, which is increasingly being firewalled by many countries. However, India has so far not mulled any action against the firm. 华为被视为过于接近中国共产党。与世界搬到5 g -电信集成所有的智能工具,汽车,工业和更多——担心华为能给北京一个后门进入至关重要的信息。美国长期以来一直阻止华为的市场。这是一个政策,紧随其后的是澳大利亚和日本,英国正在考虑之中。 美国司法部周一指控中国电信巨头华为和其首席财务官孟晚舟——目前在执法人员的监督下在加拿大被捕后,在美国的要求下,贸易和金融违规行为并试图窃取知识产权。起诉书升级的压力在中国公司,这是越来越受到许多国家的防火墙。然而,印度迄今为止没有仔细考虑任何对该公司采取行动。
Huawei<\/a> is the world’s largest telecom equipment<\/a> maker, providing the technological backbone of data services across the world. But it is viewed as being too close to Communist Party of China. With the world moving to 5G — which could integrate telecom with every smart gadget, cars, industries and more — the fear is Huawei could give Beijing a backdoor entry to crucial information.
Huawei has strongly rejected the allegations has even offered a review of its equipment. But the arrest of Wanzhou, the daughter of the company’s founder, and the indictment have escalated the situation. The indictments, citing company’s internal emails, describe a plot to steal testing equipment from T-Mobile. They also cite internal memos obtained from Meng that links her to a bank fraud<\/a> that helped Huawei evade Iran sanctions. It has been argued that Huawei tried to hamper investigation by destroying evidence and moving staff out of the US. This, and the arrest of an employee in Poland on a separate case regarding spying for China has put the company firmly in the dock.
The US has long blocked Huawei from much of its market. It’s a policy that was followed by Australia and being mulled by Britain. Even Japan has excluded Huawei and ZTE<\/a> from 5G business. The outlier is India, and officials in New Delhi have so far argued Huawei is not the only company to source products from China. But the indictment shows the matter is deeper, it’s about the very ethos of the company.
India, however, has sought to sail the other way sao far, despite its track record on data protection not being good.
<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":67752375,"title":"Telenor's Q4 earnings, full-year dividend lag forecast","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/telenors-q4-earnings-full-year-dividend-lag-forecast\/67752375","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"67750544","title":"Huawei","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"business\/india-business\/should-india-too-act-against-huawei\/huawei","category_name":"Should India too act against Huawei?","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-69579\/67750544.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/business\/india-business\/should-india-too-act-against-huawei\/huawei\/67750544"}],"msid":67752419,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Should India too act against Huawei?","synopsis":"Huawei is viewed as being too close to Communist Party of China. With the world moving to 5G \u2014 which could integrate telecom with every smart gadget, cars, industries and more \u2014 the fear is Huawei could give Beijing a backdoor entry to crucial information. The US has long blocked Huawei from much of its market. It\u2019s a policy that was followed by Australia and Japan, and being mulled by Britain.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/should-india-too-act-against-huawei","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"TIMESOFINDIA.COM","artdate":"2019-01-30 12:23:04","lastupd":"2019-01-30 12:23:04","breadcrumbTags":["huawei","Meng Wanzhou","Telecom equipment","Fraud","Corporate","ZTE","T-Mobile US"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/should-india-too-act-against-huawei"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2019-01-30" data-index="article_1">
印度也应该采取行动反对华为?
华为是世界上最大的电信设备制造商提供的技术骨干数据服务世界各地。但它被视为过于接近中国共产党。与世界搬到5 g -电信集成所有的智能工具,汽车,工业和更多——担心华为能给北京一个后门进入至关重要的信息。
美国长期以来一直阻止华为的市场。这个政策是紧随其后的是澳大利亚和英国正在考虑之中。甚至日本华为和排除在外中兴通讯从5 g业务。离群值是印度,新德里的官员迄今认为华为不是唯一的公司从中国采购产品。但起诉书显示,是更深层次的,是关于公司的风气。
然而,印度寻求另一种圣远航行,尽管它记录在数据保护不是很好。
The US Justice Department on Monday charged Chinese telecom giant Huawei<\/a> and its CFO Meng Wanzhou<\/a> — currently under the watch of law enforcers in Canada after being arrested at the behest of the US — for trade and financial violations and attempt to steal intellectual property. The indictment escalated the pressure on the Chinese company, which is increasingly being firewalled by many countries. However, India has so far not mulled any action against the firm.
Huawei<\/a> is the world’s largest telecom equipment<\/a> maker, providing the technological backbone of data services across the world. But it is viewed as being too close to Communist Party of China. With the world moving to 5G — which could integrate telecom with every smart gadget, cars, industries and more — the fear is Huawei could give Beijing a backdoor entry to crucial information.
Huawei has strongly rejected the allegations has even offered a review of its equipment. But the arrest of Wanzhou, the daughter of the company’s founder, and the indictment have escalated the situation. The indictments, citing company’s internal emails, describe a plot to steal testing equipment from T-Mobile. They also cite internal memos obtained from Meng that links her to a bank fraud<\/a> that helped Huawei evade Iran sanctions. It has been argued that Huawei tried to hamper investigation by destroying evidence and moving staff out of the US. This, and the arrest of an employee in Poland on a separate case regarding spying for China has put the company firmly in the dock.
The US has long blocked Huawei from much of its market. It’s a policy that was followed by Australia and being mulled by Britain. Even Japan has excluded Huawei and ZTE<\/a> from 5G business. The outlier is India, and officials in New Delhi have so far argued Huawei is not the only company to source products from China. But the indictment shows the matter is deeper, it’s about the very ethos of the company.
India, however, has sought to sail the other way sao far, despite its track record on data protection not being good.
<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":67752375,"title":"Telenor's Q4 earnings, full-year dividend lag forecast","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/telenors-q4-earnings-full-year-dividend-lag-forecast\/67752375","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"67750544","title":"Huawei","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"business\/india-business\/should-india-too-act-against-huawei\/huawei","category_name":"Should India too act against Huawei?","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-69579\/67750544.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/business\/india-business\/should-india-too-act-against-huawei\/huawei\/67750544"}],"msid":67752419,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Should India too act against Huawei?","synopsis":"Huawei is viewed as being too close to Communist Party of China. With the world moving to 5G \u2014 which could integrate telecom with every smart gadget, cars, industries and more \u2014 the fear is Huawei could give Beijing a backdoor entry to crucial information. The US has long blocked Huawei from much of its market. It\u2019s a policy that was followed by Australia and Japan, and being mulled by Britain.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/should-india-too-act-against-huawei","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"TIMESOFINDIA.COM","artdate":"2019-01-30 12:23:04","lastupd":"2019-01-30 12:23:04","breadcrumbTags":["huawei","Meng Wanzhou","Telecom equipment","Fraud","Corporate","ZTE","T-Mobile US"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/should-india-too-act-against-huawei"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/should-india-too-act-against-huawei/67752419">
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动