![\"\"](\"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
Industry sources said Meta Inc<\/a> will ramp up human resources for dealing with summons from GACs depending on the kind of volume of appeals, as it is a legal requirement.
They said Meta's content takedown is currently done mostly by artificial intelligence<\/a> technologies (AI), and that the actual number of complaints received by Meta's grievance officers is less than the content that is actioned through AI.
The GACs come into effect from March 1.
ET reported on Tuesday that the National Informatics Centre<\/a> (NIC) had developed a technology platform to process these user complaints against social media companies. The platform will automatically segregate the complaints - made to the government-appointed Grievance Appellate Committees (GACs) - and escalate those that require intervention to its three subcommittees.
Significant social media intermediaries (SSMIs) such as Google<\/a> and Facebook will have to be a part of the platform to address complaints and will have to file their responses to the grievances via the portal.
Meanwhile, homegrown social media platform Koo’s co-founder Mayank Bidawatka told ET that if they remove content, it has clear and transparent reasons for removal, which are public. “We have a robust structure to handle complaints of any sort with a turnaround time of 24 hours,” he said.
“The operations team multi-tasks and the same team handles multiple operations. This structure enables us to handle more with less,” Bidawatka explained.
An adverse decision by the GAC<\/a> can result in determination of fault and liability on the part of the social media intermediaries in relation to violation of the IT Rules and they may incur exorbitant compliance costs and financial penalties for providing the consumer a better dispute resolution process, Vinay Butani, partner<\/a>, Economic Laws Practice, told ET.
“This will lead to an increase in workload on the social media intermediaries,” he said.
Social media intermediaries have grievance officers who are currently appointed to handle complaints and determine the next course of action.
The GACs are appellate bodies that will either uphold the decision of the grievance officers, overrule the decisions, or recommend different actions than those recommended by the grievance officers, Pranav Srivastava, Partner, Phoenix Legal, said.
“This necessarily means social media intermediaries will need to dedicate additional resources to implement decisions of the appellate body. In addition, grievance officers of social media intermediaries like Meta, Twitter, etc may also be more cautious and may also take more time given that complaints resolved now may be taken to GACs by the users,” Srivastava said.
They may also need more staff to handle user complaints and GAC decisions, he said.
Samudra Sarangi, Partner, Panag and Babu, told ET that when an appeal is filed, social media intermediaries must engage lawyers and represent themselves before the GACs which will be an added cost for the companies in addition to having grievance mechanisms installed in the first place
Several companies outsource grievance redressal work to lawyers themselves so that there is a possibility of having legal nuance coming in at a very early stage before one goes to the GAC. So, this is one option available to the companies, so that they are better prepared once it goes up, he said.
Tanu Banerjee, Partner, Technology & Media, Khaitan & Co, said, “Since there is an appellate body that users can approach now, accountability of how social media intermediaries handle each complaint will be heightened.”
Additional liaising with GACs is likely to increase the workload, she said.
Companies operating intermediary platforms may have to be more cautious in their decisions on user complaints now, she added.
Bigger tech platforms have bigger teams and resources at their disposal, but the challenge will be for smaller players with limited resources, teams, people, talent, and infrastructure available to them, she added.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":98321551,"title":"European Parliament latest EU body to ban TikTok from staff phones","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/european-parliament-latest-eu-body-to-ban-tiktok-from-staff-phones\/98321551","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"98315785","title":"grievance redressal_THUMB IMAGE_ET TECH (1)","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"tech\/technology\/gacs-may-force-social-companies-to-bulk-up-legal-teams\/grievance-redressal_thumb-image_et-tech-1","category_name":"Social media companies bulk up legal teams amid increase in compliance requirements","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-1201693\/98315785.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/tech\/technology\/gacs-may-force-social-companies-to-bulk-up-legal-teams\/grievance-redressal_thumb-image_et-tech-1\/98315785"}],"seoschemas":false,"msid":98325326,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Social media companies bulk up legal teams amid increase in compliance requirements","synopsis":"Significant social media intermediaries (SSMIs) such as Google and Facebook will have to be a part of the platform to address complaints and will have to file their responses to the grievances via the portal.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/social-media-companies-bulk-up-legal-teams-amid-increase-in-compliance-requirements","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Suraksha P","author_link":"\/author\/479244511\/suraksha-p","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479244511.cms?width=250&height=250","author_additional":{"thumbsize":false,"msid":479244511,"author_name":"Suraksha P","author_seo_name":"suraksha-p","designation":"Correspondent","agency":false}}],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETtech","artdate":"2023-03-01 10:49:43","lastupd":"2023-03-01 10:52:08","breadcrumbTags":["gac","partner","grievance appellate committees","meta inc","internet","artificial intelligence","National Informatics Centre","google","social media platforms"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/social-media-companies-bulk-up-legal-teams-amid-increase-in-compliance-requirements"}}" data-authors="[" suraksha p"]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2023-03-01" data-index="article_1">
- Telecom乐动扑克News
- 3分钟阅读
社交媒体公司发展壮大的法律团队在法规遵循需求的增加
重要的社交媒体中介(SSMIs)谷歌和Facebook等必须的一部分平台解决投诉和将文件通过门户不满的反应。
业内人士称元公司将加大人力资源处理召唤从广汽根据上诉的体积,因为它是一个合法的要求。
他们说元的内容可拆卸的目前主要由完成人工智能技术(AI),投诉收到的实际数量元不满军官小于内容并通过人工智能。
广汽从3月1日生效。
周二报道国家信息中心(NIC)已经开发出一种技术平台来处理这些用户投诉社交媒体公司。平台会自动隔离投诉,政府任命的不满上诉委员会(gac)——和那些需要升级干预三个小组委员会。
重要的社交媒体中介(SSMIs)等谷歌和Facebook将平台的一部分解决投诉和将文件通过门户不满的反应。
与此同时,本土社交媒体平台古永锵的联合创始人玛雅Bidawatka告诉ET,如果他们删除内容,除有明确的和透明的原因,这是公开的。“我们有一个健壮的结构来处理投诉任何形式的周转时间的24小时内,”他说。
“运营团队多任务和团队处理多个操作。这种结构使我们能够处理多与少,”Bidawatka解释道。
一个不利的决定广汽可能导致故障的确定和责任的社会媒体中介与违反规则,他们可能会产生过高的合规成本和经济处罚为消费者提供一个更好的争端解决程序,Vinay巴塔,合作伙伴、经济法律实践,告诉等。
“这将导致工作量的增加社交媒体中介机构,”他说。
社交媒体中介处理投诉和申诉目前军官任命决定下一步如何行动。
广汽上诉机构,要么坚持申诉官员的决定,驳回决定,或推荐不同的动作比推荐的不满军官,Pranav斯利瓦斯塔瓦,伙伴,凤凰法律,说。
“这一定意味着社交媒体中介机构将需要额外的资源实现上诉机构的决策。此外,社交媒体的不满警察中介像元,Twitter等也可能更加谨慎,也可能需要更多时间考虑到投诉解决现在可能采取广汽的用户,”斯利瓦斯塔瓦说。
他们可能还需要更多的员工来处理用户投诉和广汽的决定,他说。
制造Sarangi,伙伴,Panag先生,告诉ET提起上诉时,社交媒体中介必须与律师和代表自己在广汽将额外的成本对公司除了申诉机制首先安装
几家公司律师申诉调整工作外包给自己,这样有可能的法律细节进入一个非常早期的阶段之前去海关总署。所以,这是一个选择的公司,以便他们更好地准备一旦上升,他说。
Tanu Banerjee、合作伙伴、技术和媒体,比& Co)说,“因为有一个上诉机构,用户可以方法现在,问责制的社会媒体中介处理每个投诉会加剧。”
额外的联络与广汽可能会增加工作量,她说。
中介平台运营的公司可能不得不更加谨慎的决定用户抱怨现在,她补充道。
大科技平台有更大的团队和资源,但小球员的挑战将是有限的资源,团队,人,人才,和基础设施提供给他们,她补充道。
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动