As the Finance Minister Arun Jaitley presents his Budget for 2016-17 on February 29, the startup community would be hoping some of their key demands and issues would be addressed. 作为财政部长杰礼物预算2016 - 17在2月29日,启动社区会希望他们的一些关键的要求和问题得到解决。
\n
According to Alok Mittal, Founder Indifi and a veteran of the Indian startup ecosystem India needs to get rid of angel tax. Similarly, Kapil Mehta , Executive Director, Securenow says the need for a valuation certificate while issuing shares should be done away. He adds that there should be no capital gains tax<\/a> for investments made. The requirement for Provident Fund in startups<\/a> should also commence only after 100 employees are reached. No tax or government body notices or scrutiny for the first three years would also be helpful.
\n
\nThe wishlist from members of TiE Delhi-NCR include:
\n
\nSanjay Singhal, Founder & Principal Consultant, Strategizers<\/strong>
\n
\n1. Clearer definition of start-up and simpler way of qualifying for the benefits of being a start-up.
\n
2. Tax holiday<\/a> for 5-years instead of current 3-years - start-ups usually do not get profitable in 3-years.
\n
\n3. Reduce dependence on venture capital firms for mobilizing capital requirements - public sector banks should be allowed to invest in start-ups.
\n
\n4. Public sector banks can appoint independent consultants for the purpose of assessment of start-ups and get 3rd party independent and credible recommendations for investment.
\n
\n5. Working capital financing from public sector banks without collateral, it could possibly be done in exchange of small % of equity.
\n
\n
\n
\nIshan Singh, REV - Re Capital Ventures<\/strong>
\n
\n1. Lower the AIF fund raising requirement to Rs. 25 lakh from Rs. 1 crore for funds investing in start ups.
\n
\n2. Simplify listing requirements in the BSE SME exchange.
\n
\n3. Shops and Establishments act should not apply to startups(This act ensures mandatory office closure on national holidays etc).
\n
\n
\n
\nSubinder Khurana, Founder BankSmart<\/strong>
\n
\n1. Allow for binding dispute resolution using Arbitration, which cannot be challenged in Courts.
\n
\n2. Allow Preference Shares that carry special rights including Liquidation Preference and veto rights (instead of having to define and enforce via just the shareholders 'agreement).
\n
\n
\n
\nMohan Lakhamraju, Founder and CEO, Great Learning and Vice Chairman and CEO, Great Lakes Institute of Management<\/strong>
\n
\nMany of the proposals presented during the Startup India conference were good, but the point that Startups need to get certified as a Startup by an Inter-ministerial committee seems to be a big dampener and a source of friction and red tape. Entrepreneurs building startups do not have time for going through red tape for a 3 year tax exemption which may or may not be useful given most startups don't have profits in the first 3-5 years. If they really want to improve ease of doing business for startups, create a quantum leap in entrepreneurship and send a bold signal, here is my proposal.
\n
\n1. Remove the need for filing income taxes for any business that is 3 years younger and has revenues less than Rs. 20- Rs. 25 crore.
\n
\n2. Remove the need for charging and filing service taxes for any business that is 3 years younger and has revenues less than Rs. 20 - Rs. 25 crore.
\nThis will lead to some loss of revenue for the government, but it will remove so a big headache for entrepreneurs in the early stages and it will also remove enforcement headaches for the government. However, most of this money will go towards employees salaries and they will pay income taxes, so the revenue loss will be mitigated, somewhat.
\n
\n
\n
\nShikha Sharma , Founder, Nutri Health<\/strong>
\n
\n1. A Portal should be created for all startups where it displays all the information and government announcements relating to start ups ( A lot of startups get harassed by inspectors because there is no clarity on rules ).
\n
\n2. Startups to have single window clearance for opening companies.
\n
\n3. Clarity on rules applying for startups and not be clubbed with established businesses as the Business reality of startups is very different from established business. For example a startup cannot afford expensive Commercial complex rents and therefore work out of garages \/ basements and hence face civic bodies ire.
\n
\n
\n
\nNeeraj Kumar Singal, Director, Semco Group<\/strong>
\n
\nAs we all know almost all startups involve some type of technology and mobility & most of the startups are providing some kind of service my request to Goverbment would be :-
\n
\n1) To provide High Speed Mobile and Internet connectivity.
\n
\n2) To exempt Service Tax for first three years or To defer service tax for first three years.
\n
\n3) Government should issue equivalent credits for all the taxes (directly or indirectly) paid by the startups which can be used \/ redeemed at various ecosystem partners like Google \/ Amazon \/ Incubation partners \/ co-working space partners.
\n
\n
\nBharat Joshi, Director, ACTL<\/strong>
\n
\nThe recent launch of the Startup India programme is a promising statement of intent, but the Budget of 2016 will determine how potently the initiative can foster a startup culture and ecosystem in India. I am sure there will be greater clarity that will emerge from the Budget, which many startups have said they seek.
\n
Deferring all regulatory compliance till after the initial 3-5 year period, will greatly free up entrepreneurial bandwidth of founders, who are typically time-poor. It's also essential to convey the opportunity and potential of the policy<\/a> to all startups- and explain that it's not restricted to tech startups alone.\"
\n
\n
\n
\nAshutosh Pande, Founder & Chief Innovation officer of PaySe<\/strong>
\n
\nThe government said in one of its communications to the Payment Council of India that merchants with more than 50% of their transactions done digitally could get a tax rebate or a 1-2% reduction in value-added tax on all electronic transactions. Consumers could get some income tax rebates if they showed a certain portion of their net expenses was incurred digitally.
\n
\nA similar initiative was implemented in South Korea and helped transform a predominantly cash nation. Success of the initiative in Korea was driven by the willingness of the government to allow various payment instruments including open, semi-closed and closed pre-paid instruments to be within the gambit of digital payment. A similar policy will help the merchants and consumers overcome the initial inertia.
\n
\n
\nAnil Sachdev, Founder & CEO of School of Inspired Leadership <\/strong>
\n
\nWith the focus on Digital India and start-ups, it would be nice to see investments in education and skilling programs to prepare the next generation. There is urgent need to transform bodies such as AICTE that control inputs such as curriculum and infrastructure and replace them with a body that rates \"learning outcomes\".
\n
\nWe need to attract private capital into higher education and invite ethical companies to invest and earn reasonable returns and ensure high standards in education. In other words we need to remove all controls and replace them with enabling regulation.\n\n<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":51150838,"title":"Budget 2016: Finance Ministry seeks experts' views on impact of security transaction tax removal","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/budget-2016-finance-ministry-seeks-experts-views-on-impact-of-security-transaction-tax-removal\/51150838","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":51150864,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Startups want Budget 2016 to remove capital gains tax, extend tax holiday","synopsis":"As Budget 2016 is edging closer, the startups are hoping that at least some of their key demands and issues would be addressed.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/startups-want-budget-2016-to-remove-capital-gains-tax-extend-tax-holiday","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Pranbihanga Borpuzari","author_link":"\/author\/479234120\/pranbihanga-borpuzari","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479234120.cms?width=100&height=100&hostid=268","author_additional":{"thumbsize":false,"msid":479234120,"author_name":"Pranbihanga Borpuzari","author_seo_name":"pranbihanga-borpuzari","designation":"Associate Editor","agency":false}}],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2016-02-26 11:29:02","lastupd":"2016-02-26 11:29:43","breadcrumbTags":["policy","Tax holiday","Startups","capital gains tax","Budget 2016"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/startups-want-budget-2016-to-remove-capital-gains-tax-extend-tax-holiday"}}" data-authors="[" pranbihanga borpuzari"]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2016-02-26" data-index="article_1">
阿洛克米塔尔表示,印度创业生态系统的创始人Indifi和资深印度需要摆脱天使税。同样,Kapil Mehta执行董事,Securenow说需要一个估值证书而发行股票应该被取缔。他补充说,不应该有资本利得税投资。公积金的要求创业公司还应该开始后才达到了100名员工。没有税收或政府机构通知或审查前三年也会有帮助。
的愿望列表的成员领带德里首都区包括:
Sanjay Singhal创始人&主要顾问,Strategizers
1。清晰定义的启动和排位赛的简单的方法是一个创业的好处。
2。免税期目前5年而不是3年——初创企业通常不会在3年获得盈利。
3所示。减少依赖风险投资公司动员资本金要求——公共部门应该允许银行投资于初创公司。
4所示。公共部门银行可以任命独立顾问的目的是评估的初创企业和第三方独立、可靠的投资建议。
5。从公共部门银行营运资本融资没有抵押品,它可能在交换小%的股权。
伊珊辛格,牧师——资本投资
1。降低AIF Rs的融资要求。25多数部门盈利的基金。投资创业。
2。简化疯牛病中小企业交易所的上市要求。
3所示。商店和机构行为不应适用于初创公司(这个法案确保强制关闭办公室国定假日等)。
Subinder Khurana认为,创始人BankSmart
1。允许绑定使用仲裁纠纷解决,不能在法庭上受到挑战。
2。允许携带特殊权利包括优先股清算优先权和否决权(而不是通过仅仅定义和执行股东协议)。
Mohan Lakhamraju,创始人兼首席执行官,伟大的学习和副董事长兼首席执行官,大湖研究所的管理
启动印度发布会上提出的许多建议是好的,但是创业的创业公司需要注册一个部际委员会似乎是一个大阻尼器和摩擦和繁文缛节的来源。企业家构建创业没有时间经历繁文缛节3年免税这可能是也可能不是有用给大多数创业公司没有利润在第一个3 - 5年。如果他们真的想改善经商创业,在创业中创建一个飞跃和发送一个大胆的信号,这是我的建议。
1。删除任何业务需要申报所得税,年轻3岁,收入低于Rs。20 - Rs。25卢比。
2。删除需要充电和归档服务税对于任何业务是3岁,收入低于Rs。20 - Rs。25卢比。
这将会导致政府收入的损失,但它会删除所以头疼为企业家在早期阶段,它还将删除执行政府最头疼的问题。然而,大多数的这些钱将用于员工工资和他们将支付所得税,所以收入损失将会减轻,有点。
Shikha Sharma,创始人,营养健康
1。门户应该创建所有的创业公司,它显示的所有信息和政府公告有关创业(很多创业公司被检查人员骚扰,因为没有明确规则)。
2。开公司的初创企业有单窗口间隙。
3所示。明确规定申请创业而不是联合与老牌企业创业的商业现实非常不同于建立业务。例如公司负担不起昂贵的商业租金,因此解决复杂的车库和地下室,因此面对民间团体的愤怒。
Neeraj Kumar说信号、导演、Semco组
我们都知道几乎所有的创业公司涉及到某种类型的技术和流动&大部分创业公司都提供某种服务Goverbment我的请求是:-
1)提供高速移动和互联网连接。
2)为前三年免税服务税或推迟对前三年服务税。
3)政府应该发行相当于抵免的税收支付的(直接或间接)的创业公司可以使用像谷歌这样的救赎在不同生态系统合作伙伴/亚马逊/孵化合作伙伴/合作伙伴联合办公空间。
巴拉特Joshi、导演、ACTL
印度最近启动的创业项目是一个有前途的意向声明,但2016年的预算将决定如何强有力地主动培育创业文化和生态系统在印度。我相信会有更清晰的从预算,会出现许多初创公司说他们寻找。
推迟所有的法规遵从性,直到在最初的3 - 5年之后,将极大地释放企业创始人的带宽,通常是有钱没时间的人。它也是必不可少的转达的机遇和潜力政策所有创业公司,并解释这不是局限于科技创业。”
PaySe Ashutosh潘德,创始人兼首席创新官
政府说在一个通讯支付委员会的印度商人拥有超过50%的交易完成数字可以得到退税或减少1 - 2%增值税电子交易。消费者可以得到一些收入退税如果他们显示某一部分的净是费用数字。
在韩国类似的计划实施,并帮助将以现金为主的国家。倡议的成功在韩国是由政府的意愿,允许各种支付工具包括开放、半封闭和封闭的预付费仪器在电子支付的策略。类似的政策将帮助商人和消费者克服最初的惯性。
Anil Sachdev学院的创始人和CEO灵感的领导
印度关注数字和初创企业,这将是很高兴见到投资教育和斯奇林项目准备下一代。有迫切需要变换等机构AICTE控制输入课程和基础设施等,代之以身体利率“学习成果”。
我们需要吸引私人资本进入高等教育,邀请道德公司并获得合理的投资回报,确保高标准的教育。换句话说,我们需要删除所有控件,代之以使监管。
As the Finance Minister Arun Jaitley presents his Budget for 2016-17 on February 29, the startup community would be hoping some of their key demands and issues would be addressed.
\n
According to Alok Mittal, Founder Indifi and a veteran of the Indian startup ecosystem India needs to get rid of angel tax. Similarly, Kapil Mehta , Executive Director, Securenow says the need for a valuation certificate while issuing shares should be done away. He adds that there should be no capital gains tax<\/a> for investments made. The requirement for Provident Fund in startups<\/a> should also commence only after 100 employees are reached. No tax or government body notices or scrutiny for the first three years would also be helpful.
\n
\nThe wishlist from members of TiE Delhi-NCR include:
\n
\nSanjay Singhal, Founder & Principal Consultant, Strategizers<\/strong>
\n
\n1. Clearer definition of start-up and simpler way of qualifying for the benefits of being a start-up.
\n
2. Tax holiday<\/a> for 5-years instead of current 3-years - start-ups usually do not get profitable in 3-years.
\n
\n3. Reduce dependence on venture capital firms for mobilizing capital requirements - public sector banks should be allowed to invest in start-ups.
\n
\n4. Public sector banks can appoint independent consultants for the purpose of assessment of start-ups and get 3rd party independent and credible recommendations for investment.
\n
\n5. Working capital financing from public sector banks without collateral, it could possibly be done in exchange of small % of equity.
\n
\n
\n
\nIshan Singh, REV - Re Capital Ventures<\/strong>
\n
\n1. Lower the AIF fund raising requirement to Rs. 25 lakh from Rs. 1 crore for funds investing in start ups.
\n
\n2. Simplify listing requirements in the BSE SME exchange.
\n
\n3. Shops and Establishments act should not apply to startups(This act ensures mandatory office closure on national holidays etc).
\n
\n
\n
\nSubinder Khurana, Founder BankSmart<\/strong>
\n
\n1. Allow for binding dispute resolution using Arbitration, which cannot be challenged in Courts.
\n
\n2. Allow Preference Shares that carry special rights including Liquidation Preference and veto rights (instead of having to define and enforce via just the shareholders 'agreement).
\n
\n
\n
\nMohan Lakhamraju, Founder and CEO, Great Learning and Vice Chairman and CEO, Great Lakes Institute of Management<\/strong>
\n
\nMany of the proposals presented during the Startup India conference were good, but the point that Startups need to get certified as a Startup by an Inter-ministerial committee seems to be a big dampener and a source of friction and red tape. Entrepreneurs building startups do not have time for going through red tape for a 3 year tax exemption which may or may not be useful given most startups don't have profits in the first 3-5 years. If they really want to improve ease of doing business for startups, create a quantum leap in entrepreneurship and send a bold signal, here is my proposal.
\n
\n1. Remove the need for filing income taxes for any business that is 3 years younger and has revenues less than Rs. 20- Rs. 25 crore.
\n
\n2. Remove the need for charging and filing service taxes for any business that is 3 years younger and has revenues less than Rs. 20 - Rs. 25 crore.
\nThis will lead to some loss of revenue for the government, but it will remove so a big headache for entrepreneurs in the early stages and it will also remove enforcement headaches for the government. However, most of this money will go towards employees salaries and they will pay income taxes, so the revenue loss will be mitigated, somewhat.
\n
\n
\n
\nShikha Sharma , Founder, Nutri Health<\/strong>
\n
\n1. A Portal should be created for all startups where it displays all the information and government announcements relating to start ups ( A lot of startups get harassed by inspectors because there is no clarity on rules ).
\n
\n2. Startups to have single window clearance for opening companies.
\n
\n3. Clarity on rules applying for startups and not be clubbed with established businesses as the Business reality of startups is very different from established business. For example a startup cannot afford expensive Commercial complex rents and therefore work out of garages \/ basements and hence face civic bodies ire.
\n
\n
\n
\nNeeraj Kumar Singal, Director, Semco Group<\/strong>
\n
\nAs we all know almost all startups involve some type of technology and mobility & most of the startups are providing some kind of service my request to Goverbment would be :-
\n
\n1) To provide High Speed Mobile and Internet connectivity.
\n
\n2) To exempt Service Tax for first three years or To defer service tax for first three years.
\n
\n3) Government should issue equivalent credits for all the taxes (directly or indirectly) paid by the startups which can be used \/ redeemed at various ecosystem partners like Google \/ Amazon \/ Incubation partners \/ co-working space partners.
\n
\n
\nBharat Joshi, Director, ACTL<\/strong>
\n
\nThe recent launch of the Startup India programme is a promising statement of intent, but the Budget of 2016 will determine how potently the initiative can foster a startup culture and ecosystem in India. I am sure there will be greater clarity that will emerge from the Budget, which many startups have said they seek.
\n
Deferring all regulatory compliance till after the initial 3-5 year period, will greatly free up entrepreneurial bandwidth of founders, who are typically time-poor. It's also essential to convey the opportunity and potential of the policy<\/a> to all startups- and explain that it's not restricted to tech startups alone.\"
\n
\n
\n
\nAshutosh Pande, Founder & Chief Innovation officer of PaySe<\/strong>
\n
\nThe government said in one of its communications to the Payment Council of India that merchants with more than 50% of their transactions done digitally could get a tax rebate or a 1-2% reduction in value-added tax on all electronic transactions. Consumers could get some income tax rebates if they showed a certain portion of their net expenses was incurred digitally.
\n
\nA similar initiative was implemented in South Korea and helped transform a predominantly cash nation. Success of the initiative in Korea was driven by the willingness of the government to allow various payment instruments including open, semi-closed and closed pre-paid instruments to be within the gambit of digital payment. A similar policy will help the merchants and consumers overcome the initial inertia.
\n
\n
\nAnil Sachdev, Founder & CEO of School of Inspired Leadership <\/strong>
\n
\nWith the focus on Digital India and start-ups, it would be nice to see investments in education and skilling programs to prepare the next generation. There is urgent need to transform bodies such as AICTE that control inputs such as curriculum and infrastructure and replace them with a body that rates \"learning outcomes\".
\n
\nWe need to attract private capital into higher education and invite ethical companies to invest and earn reasonable returns and ensure high standards in education. In other words we need to remove all controls and replace them with enabling regulation.\n\n<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":51150838,"title":"Budget 2016: Finance Ministry seeks experts' views on impact of security transaction tax removal","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/budget-2016-finance-ministry-seeks-experts-views-on-impact-of-security-transaction-tax-removal\/51150838","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":51150864,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Startups want Budget 2016 to remove capital gains tax, extend tax holiday","synopsis":"As Budget 2016 is edging closer, the startups are hoping that at least some of their key demands and issues would be addressed.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/startups-want-budget-2016-to-remove-capital-gains-tax-extend-tax-holiday","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Pranbihanga Borpuzari","author_link":"\/author\/479234120\/pranbihanga-borpuzari","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479234120.cms?width=100&height=100&hostid=268","author_additional":{"thumbsize":false,"msid":479234120,"author_name":"Pranbihanga Borpuzari","author_seo_name":"pranbihanga-borpuzari","designation":"Associate Editor","agency":false}}],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2016-02-26 11:29:02","lastupd":"2016-02-26 11:29:43","breadcrumbTags":["policy","Tax holiday","Startups","capital gains tax","Budget 2016"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/startups-want-budget-2016-to-remove-capital-gains-tax-extend-tax-holiday"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/startups-want-budget-2016-to-remove-capital-gains-tax-extend-tax-holiday/51150864">
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动