独家
电信公司反对Trai关于强制显示来电显示的观点
沃达丰Idea在其提交的文件中表示:“在我们看来，CNAP应该作为一项可选服务引入印度的电信网络，不应该强制要求tsp推出它。”并补充说，在电信网络中推出CNAP的决定由电信运营商选择是“最合适的”。
新德里:电信运营商对此表示反对印度电信监管局(TRAI)建议在网络中强制引入呼叫名称显示(CNAP)设施，理由包括技术困难、缺乏可能支持该功能的手机以及隐私问题。
“我们认为，CNAP设施是一种很好的补充增值服务(增值服务)服务，然而，在一个超过3.75亿用户(超过3.5亿移动非宽带用户和超过2500万有线用户)不太可能拥有支持CNAP的设备的国家，此外，相当一部分无线宽带用户可能也没有拥有支持CNAP的设备，可以肯定地说，它不应该是一项强制性服务。”依赖Jio资讯通讯在向电讯监管局提交的“在电讯网络中引入称呼名称显示”谘询文件中表示。
然而，Jio建议采用谨慎的方法，同时解释了一些技术问题，如信号负载的增加以及对延迟和互连问题的可能影响。
“在我们看来，CNAP应该作为一项可选服务引入印度的电信网络，不应该强制要求tsp推出它，”他说沃达丰的想法他补充说，在电信网络中推出CNAP的决定由电信运营商来决定，这将是“最合适的”。
国营电信电源Bharat Sanchar Nigam有限公司(BSNL)指出，在垃圾电话、欺诈电话、CLI欺骗和未经请求的商业通信(UCC)普遍存在的情况下，电信消费者正在积极寻求在手机上显示来电名的功能。但是，它反对将国民登记服务规定为强制性服务的意见。
“它应该作为一项可选的增值服务。在实施的初始阶段，CNAP服务应该作为增值服务(VAS)提供，为用户提供额外的功能，允许用户使用他们喜欢的名称、商业名称、公共机构或非政府组织的名称、商标等。”
Bharti Airtel，在其提交的文件中建议，CNAP解决方案应主要针对A2P、电话营销、UCC呼叫，这些是当今垃圾邮件数量的主要驱动因素。它补充说:“由于P2P路由(单个模拟人生/批量模拟人生)不断被滥用，解决方案应该涵盖滥用路由的无道德呼叫者。”
他说:“因此，我们有需要推出综合医疗服务补充服务。然而，它们应该只用于商业/A2P呼叫活动的有限目的，包括P2P滥用呼叫者，”Airtel说。
据印度第二大电信公司估计，有500万至800万实体/用户从事电话营销/A2P/商业呼叫，不包括沉迷于滥用的P2P用户/号码。
印度移动运营商协会(COAI)表示，CNAP可以作为一种可靠的补充服务，向接到呼叫的一方提供呼叫方的详细信息。
他说:“不过，电讯服务供应商已为其用户提供来电号码显示(CLIP)作为补充服务。”该业务提供主叫号码，主叫号码显示在被叫手机上。除了CLIP服务外，TRAI还推出了“请勿打扰”(DND)服务，以防止未经注册的电话推销员进行未经请求的通信。”COAI说。
宽带印度论坛(BIF)在其提交的文件中表示:“我们同意交通部的观点，即在电信网络中引入CNAP设施将使用户在接到来电时做出明智的决定，并将减少未知/垃圾来电者对用户的骚扰。”
强制显示来电显示是2022年电信法案草案的重要组成部分。该中心在法案中规定，电信运营商必须确保在给另一个人打电话时，用户的姓名和身份显示在屏幕上。瑞典Truecaller例如，App为其全球用户提供了这样一种工具。
“我们认为，CNAP设施是一种很好的补充增值服务(增值服务)服务，然而，在一个超过3.75亿用户(超过3.5亿移动非宽带用户和超过2500万有线用户)不太可能拥有支持CNAP的设备的国家，此外，相当一部分无线宽带用户可能也没有拥有支持CNAP的设备，可以肯定地说，它不应该是一项强制性服务。”依赖Jio资讯通讯在向电讯监管局提交的“在电讯网络中引入称呼名称显示”谘询文件中表示。
然而，Jio建议采用谨慎的方法，同时解释了一些技术问题，如信号负载的增加以及对延迟和互连问题的可能影响。
国营电信电源Bharat Sanchar Nigam有限公司(BSNL)指出，在垃圾电话、欺诈电话、CLI欺骗和未经请求的商业通信(UCC)普遍存在的情况下，电信消费者正在积极寻求在手机上显示来电名的功能。但是，它反对将国民登记服务规定为强制性服务的意见。
“它应该作为一项可选的增值服务。在实施的初始阶段，CNAP服务应该作为增值服务(VAS)提供，为用户提供额外的功能，允许用户使用他们喜欢的名称、商业名称、公共机构或非政府组织的名称、商标等。”
Bharti Airtel，在其提交的文件中建议，CNAP解决方案应主要针对A2P、电话营销、UCC呼叫，这些是当今垃圾邮件数量的主要驱动因素。它补充说:“由于P2P路由(单个模拟人生/批量模拟人生)不断被滥用，解决方案应该涵盖滥用路由的无道德呼叫者。”
据印度第二大电信公司估计，有500万至800万实体/用户从事电话营销/A2P/商业呼叫，不包括沉迷于滥用的P2P用户/号码。
印度移动运营商协会(COAI)表示，CNAP可以作为一种可靠的补充服务，向接到呼叫的一方提供呼叫方的详细信息。
“波段间频谱共享不太可能找到很多人”
他们补充说，频段间频谱和主动基础设施共享的理由在短期内也不存在，因为两家最大的电信公司Reliance Jio和Bharti Airtel正在追求截然不同的5G战略。这是因为Jio在全国范围内部署5G网络时选择了独立(SA)模式，而Airtel则选择了非独立(NSA)模式，这两种模式的全球生态系统非常不同。
他说:“不过，电讯服务供应商已为其用户提供来电号码显示(CLIP)作为补充服务。”该业务提供主叫号码，主叫号码显示在被叫手机上。除了CLIP服务外，TRAI还推出了“请勿打扰”(DND)服务，以防止未经注册的电话推销员进行未经请求的通信。”COAI说。
宽带印度论坛(BIF)在其提交的文件中表示:“我们同意交通部的观点，即在电信网络中引入CNAP设施将使用户在接到来电时做出明智的决定，并将减少未知/垃圾来电者对用户的骚扰。”
强制显示来电显示是2022年电信法案草案的重要组成部分。该中心在法案中规定，电信运营商必须确保在给另一个人打电话时，用户的姓名和身份显示在屏幕上。瑞典Truecaller例如，App为其全球用户提供了这样一种工具。
NEW DELHI: Telecom operators have opposed the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (TRAI)\u2019s recommendations to compulsorily introduce the Calling Name Presentation (CNAP) facility in networks, citing reasons such as technical difficulties, a lack of handsets that may support this feature, and privacy issues.
\u201cWe submit that the CNAP facilities is a good to have supplementary VAS (value added service) service, however, in a country where over 375 million users (over 350 million mobile nonbroadband users and over 25 million wireline users) are unlikely to possess a CNAP enabled device, in addition to a sizable portion of the wireless broadband users that may not be possessing CNAP enabled devices as well, it can safely be said that it should not be a mandatory service,\u201d Reliance Jio<\/a> Infocomm said in its submission to the telecom regulator\u2019s consultation paper on \u2018Introduction of Calling Name Presentation (CNAP) in Telecommunication Networks\u2019.
Jio, however, recommended a cautious approach, while explaining technical issues such as an increased load on signaling and a possible impact on latency and interconnection issues.
\u201cWe submit that the CNAP facilities is a good to have supplementary VAS (value added service) service, however, in a country where over 375 million users (over 350 million mobile nonbroadband users and over 25 million wireline users) are unlikely to possess a CNAP enabled device, in addition to a sizable portion of the wireless broadband users that may not be possessing CNAP enabled devices as well, it can safely be said that it should not be a mandatory service,\u201d Reliance Jio<\/a> Infocomm said in its submission to the telecom regulator\u2019s consultation paper on \u2018Introduction of Calling Name Presentation (CNAP) in Telecommunication Networks\u2019.
Jio, however, recommended a cautious approach, while explaining technical issues such as an increased load on signaling and a possible impact on latency and interconnection issues.
<\/div><\/div>\u201cIn our view, CNAP should be introduced in telecommunication networks in India as an optional service and it should not be mandated upon TSPs to launch it,\u201d said Vodafone Idea<\/a> in its submission, adding that it would be \u201cmost appropriate\u201d that the decision to launch CNAP in telecoms networks is left to the choice of telecom operators.
State-run telecom PSU Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited<\/a> (BSNL) submitted that telecom consumers are actively seeking the facility of a calling name presentation on their phones amid the prevalence of spam calls, fraud calls, CLI spoofing, and unsolicited commercial communications (UCC). It, however, opposed the view to make CNAP a mandatory service.
\u201cIt should be kept as an optional value-added service. In initial phase of implementation CNAP service should be provided as a Value Added Services (VAS) with additional features for subscribers wherein subscribers are allowed to use their preferred name, commercial name, a public institution or non-governmental organization\u2019s name, trademark etc,\u201d BSNL said.
Bharti Airtel<\/a>, in its submission, recommended that a CNAP solution should be primarily targeted at A2P, telemarketing, UCC calling, which are the major drivers of spam volume today. \u201cSince the P2P route (individual SIMs\/Bulk SIMs) is continuously misused, the solution should cover the unscrupulous callers who misuse the route,\u201d it added.
State-run telecom PSU Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited<\/a> (BSNL) submitted that telecom consumers are actively seeking the facility of a calling name presentation on their phones amid the prevalence of spam calls, fraud calls, CLI spoofing, and unsolicited commercial communications (UCC). It, however, opposed the view to make CNAP a mandatory service.
\u201cIt should be kept as an optional value-added service. In initial phase of implementation CNAP service should be provided as a Value Added Services (VAS) with additional features for subscribers wherein subscribers are allowed to use their preferred name, commercial name, a public institution or non-governmental organization\u2019s name, trademark etc,\u201d BSNL said.
Bharti Airtel<\/a>, in its submission, recommended that a CNAP solution should be primarily targeted at A2P, telemarketing, UCC calling, which are the major drivers of spam volume today. \u201cSince the P2P route (individual SIMs\/Bulk SIMs) is continuously misused, the solution should cover the unscrupulous callers who misuse the route,\u201d it added.
<\/div><\/div>\u201cHence, yes, there is a need to introduce the CNAP supplementary services. They should, however, be introduced for the limited purpose of commercial\/A2P calling activities only, covering the P2P misuse callers,\u201d Airtel said.
According to estimates by the second-largest Indian telco, there are anywhere between 5 to 8 million entities\/users engaged in telemarketing\/A2P\/commercial calling, excluding the P2P users\/numbers who indulge in misuse.
The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) said that CNAP may serve as a good to have reliable supplementary service to provide the details of the calling party to the party receiving the call.
According to estimates by the second-largest Indian telco, there are anywhere between 5 to 8 million entities\/users engaged in telemarketing\/A2P\/commercial calling, excluding the P2P users\/numbers who indulge in misuse.
The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) said that CNAP may serve as a good to have reliable supplementary service to provide the details of the calling party to the party receiving the call.
![](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>