独家
电信公司,科技玩家在数据中心fiberisation晶石
在其提交印度电信管理局(火车),依赖Jio敦促监管机构支持纤维连接DCs只能通过“领有执照的实体”。警告,任何“毫无根据的干扰会导致监管方面的不确定性,威胁国家安全,导致资源的浪费导致市场扭曲,诉讼和经济部门的低效率”。
在其提交的印度电信管理部门(火车),依赖Jio敦促监管机构支持纤维连接DCs只能通过“领有执照的实体”。警告,任何“毫无根据的干扰会导致监管方面的不确定性,威胁国家安全,导致资源的浪费导致市场扭曲,诉讼和经济部门的低效率”。
科技公司,他们反驳Jio的观点,说任何严厉的进入壁垒将导致DCs集中在城市市场电信公司很少投资于宽带基础设施在农村地区和小城镇等,也会破坏新生的直流的增长前景行业。
火车,讨论文件建立DCs的监管框架和内容分发网络(cdn),估计印度直流市场15亿年的2022美元,增长11.4%复合年增长率到2025年规模50亿美元大关。一个行业协会全球数据中心市场研究估计,到2025年将达到每年2000亿美元,由投资驱动的hyper-scale DCs对云服务的需求不断上升。
Jio也抨击移动增值服务提供商,说他们的担忧在电信网络不适合提供云服务是“完全错误的”,考虑到电信公司准备推出低延迟,高速5 g网络。它补充道,许可的电信公司已经在网络支持企业进行了可观的投资客户提供宽带服务质量。
Bharti Airtel周围还反驳,说任何挑战提供纤维连接DCs可以轻松克服如果相关“正确的方式(行)问题迅速得到解决”。
另外,印度两大电信公司Jio和旅馆,就需要调节cdn——全球科技玩家使用本地主机的数据,以确保严格执行网络中立规则。
Jio希望火车回呼吁将cdn监管框架下,这样的“互联网公司之间的合同协议,cdn,电信和互联网服务提供商可以监控任何反竞争行为和违反网络中立原则”。
cdn,一般来说,是一个地理上分散的组服务器一起提供快速交付的互联网内容。因此,他们是受欢迎的互联网公司和内容提供商将它们部署到改善客户体验和节省带宽需求。
Airtel在其提交火车说,“商业安排发布商和互联网服务提供商之间应该继续受市场力量和()不需要监管干预”。它说,这是自从受益cdn内容提供商和服务提供商共同。
苏尼尔•米塔尔反对Jio设为卫星通信频谱拍卖
在他的第一个评论Jio进入卫星通信,米塔尔告诉等,而穆克什Ambani-led公司就是分配的带宽(由卢森堡伙伴SES)在印度,OneWeb会做生产和分配带宽。
它补充说,真正的优先考虑火车”应该是在互联网普及率增加激励茶匙/ isp(执照费豁免形式)作为他们的投资不仅增加这样的普及率也在满足印度的安全需求通过确保善意使用服务和监控网络流量”。
Airtel说“发布商,无照经营的实体,可以得到一个简单的注册框架实施的要求服务质量,安全性和内容屏蔽”。
2017年8月,火车已经推荐一个自由和开放的互联网,甚至建议货币惩罚违反网络中立规则,从50000卢比每违反一天但限制在Rs 50个十万的。它还提出一个多方利益相关者的身体,包括电信运营商、互联网服务提供商、内容提供商、公民社会组织和消费者代表探测违规。
2018年8月,电信部门支持火车的建议,但表示的实际监测和执行规则将保持,,提出了利益相关者的身体只会玩一个顾问的角色。
![\"](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
In its submission to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (Trai<\/a>), Reliance Jio<\/a> has urged the regulator to back fibre connectivity to DCs only via \u201clicenced entities\u201d. It has warned that any \u201cunwarranted interference would result in regulatory uncertainty, threaten national security and result in wastage of resources causing market distortions, litigations and economic inefficiencies in the sector\u201d.
Tech companies, on their part, have countered Jio\u2019s views, saying any draconian entry barriers would lead to a concentration of DCs around urban markets as telcos<\/a> have seldom invested in such broadband infrastructure in rural areas and small towns, and would also undermine the growth prospects of the nascent DC industry<\/a>.
<\/div><\/div>\u201c\u2026advocating fibre connectivity to DCs only by licensed entities and disallowing captive use of dark fibre will be detrimental to the growth of an infant DC industry that\u2019s heavily reliant on such infrastructure,\u201d the Broadband India Forum (BIF) said in its Trai submission. Having \u201cinsurmountable barriers to entry\u201d will also affect the welfare of consumers, said the BIF, which counts Amazon, Cisco, Google, Microsoft<\/a>, Facebook-owner Meta, Qualcomm<\/a> and Intel among its members.
Trai, in its discussion paper on the regulatory framework for establishing DCs and content delivery networks (CDNs), has estimated the Indian DC market to be $1.5 billion in 2022, and grow at a 11.4% compounded annual rate to scale the $5-billion mark by 2025. A Nasscom<\/a> study estimates the global data centre market to reach $200 billion a year by 2025, driven by investments in hyper-scale DCs amid rising demand for cloud services.
Jio has also slammed mobile value-added services providers, saying their worries around telco networks not being suited to deliver cloud services were \u201cfactually misplaced\u201d, given that telcos were poised to roll out low-latency, high speed 5G networks. It added that licensed telcos had already made sizeable investments in networks to support enterprise customers with quality broadband services.
Trai, in its discussion paper on the regulatory framework for establishing DCs and content delivery networks (CDNs), has estimated the Indian DC market to be $1.5 billion in 2022, and grow at a 11.4% compounded annual rate to scale the $5-billion mark by 2025. A Nasscom<\/a> study estimates the global data centre market to reach $200 billion a year by 2025, driven by investments in hyper-scale DCs amid rising demand for cloud services.
Jio has also slammed mobile value-added services providers, saying their worries around telco networks not being suited to deliver cloud services were \u201cfactually misplaced\u201d, given that telcos were poised to roll out low-latency, high speed 5G networks. It added that licensed telcos had already made sizeable investments in networks to support enterprise customers with quality broadband services.
<\/div><\/div>The Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI), in its Trai submission, said traditional mobile phone networks \u201care principally designed for mobile voice services or public data services, such as IP services, and accordingly, not suitable for cloud services which require very high availability, bandwidth and low-latency for extremely high amounts of data\u201d. The IAMAI represents India\u2019s online and mobile value-added services sectors.
Bharti Airtel<\/a> has also countered this, saying any challenges around delivering fibre connectivity to DCs can be easily overcome if associated \u201cright of way (RoW) issues are resolved quickly\u201d.
Separately, India\u2019s top two telcos, Jio and Airtel, have sparred over the need to regulate CDNs \u2014 used by global tech players to locally host data \u2014 to ensure tighter enforcement of net neutrality rules.
Jio wants Trai to back its call for bringing CDNs under a regulatory framework so that \u201ccontractual pacts between Internet companies, CDNs, telcos and ISPs can be monitored for any anticompetitive practices and violation of any net neutrality principles\u201d.
The CDNs, typically, are a geographically distributed group of servers that work together to provide swift delivery of Internet content. As a result, they are popular with Internet companies and content providers who deploy them to improve customer experience and save bandwidth needs.
Airtel, in its submission to Trai, said \u201ccommercial arrangements between CDNs and ISPs should continue to be governed by market forces and (that) no regulatory intervention is required\u201d. This, it said, is since the benefits from CDNs are mutual for content providers and ISPs.
Bharti Airtel<\/a> has also countered this, saying any challenges around delivering fibre connectivity to DCs can be easily overcome if associated \u201cright of way (RoW) issues are resolved quickly\u201d.
Separately, India\u2019s top two telcos, Jio and Airtel, have sparred over the need to regulate CDNs \u2014 used by global tech players to locally host data \u2014 to ensure tighter enforcement of net neutrality rules.
Jio wants Trai to back its call for bringing CDNs under a regulatory framework so that \u201ccontractual pacts between Internet companies, CDNs, telcos and ISPs can be monitored for any anticompetitive practices and violation of any net neutrality principles\u201d.
The CDNs, typically, are a geographically distributed group of servers that work together to provide swift delivery of Internet content. As a result, they are popular with Internet companies and content providers who deploy them to improve customer experience and save bandwidth needs.
Airtel, in its submission to Trai, said \u201ccommercial arrangements between CDNs and ISPs should continue to be governed by market forces and (that) no regulatory intervention is required\u201d. This, it said, is since the benefits from CDNs are mutual for content providers and ISPs.