X

我们使用cookie,以确保适合你的经验

我们用饼干和其他跟踪技术来提高你的浏览体验在我们的网站上,显示个性化内容和有针对性的广告,分析网站流量,并理解我们的观众来自哪里。你也可以阅读我们的隐私政策,我们使用cookie来确保你在我们的网站上的最好的体验。

选择我接受,或继续在网站上,你同意我们使用饼干和条款和条件。

得到应用
\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure> The Supreme Court has cracked the whip on telcos for not paying the adjusted gross revenue (AGR<\/a>) dues of 92,000 crore. Some telecom circle authorities reportedly issued notices for payment by midnight Friday. The Red Queen famously believed in six impossible things before breakfast. Can’t the department of telecom (DoT) believe in just one, late in the evening? What is possible can be listed, though: civil servants can protect their backsides by asking telcos to make impossible payments, Vodafone<\/a> Idea can fold up, unless Aditya Birla<\/a> chips in with some 19,000 crore, now that Vodafone has declared it would not put fresh money into the Indian arm; without a fellow operator to share costs with, Airtel<\/a> would see its costs go up and raise tariffs, all the more easily, now that the sector would turn into a duopoly with Reliance<\/a> Jio. It is also possible that investors would see Vodafone Idea’s plight as the real index of the ease of doing business in India.

How did we come to this pass? When Indian telecom migrated from a fixed, and unaffordably high, licence fee to licence fee as a share of revenue in 1999, telcos were shown a draft condition that said sector regulator Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (Trai) would specify what kinds of revenue would be deemed shareable. When the actual licence was issued, the condition said a share of gross revenue. This went into dispute in 2003. Since then, NDA 1, UPA 1 and 2, and NDA 2 have pursued the licenser’s claim to a share of aggregate revenue, regardless of whether the revenue was derived from exercise of the telecom licence or not. In October 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that telcos must pay a share of their gross revenue, as that is what they signed on to. This judicial fixation on form over substance took telcos by surprise. They sought a review, which was dismissed, they pleaded for time to pay up, which has now been turned down.

Survival of a competitive telecom market, adoption of 5G, the future of digital India — all are up in the air. Only brave government policy can save Indian telecom. Another impossible thing? For the nation’s sake, we should hope not.

<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":74144499,"title":"AGR issue: Telecom minister Ravi Shankar Prasad meets PM; DoT takes back order","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/agr-issue-telecom-minister-ravi-shankar-prasad-meets-pm-dot-takes-back-order\/74144499","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":74144506,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Telecom: A death judicially ordained - View","synopsis":"Only strong policy can salvage the mess","titleseo":"telecomnews\/telecom-a-death-judicially-ordained","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETTelecom","artdate":"2020-02-15 08:31:22","lastupd":"2020-02-15 08:39:36","breadcrumbTags":["Airtel","Reliance","Aditya Birla","Telecom Regulatory Authority of India","Industry","AGR","Vodafone"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/telecom-a-death-judicially-ordained"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2020-02-15" data-index="article_1">

电信:死亡公正地任命——视图

只有强有力的政策才能挽救残局

  • 更新于2020年2月15日凌晨08:39坚持
最高法院打裂鞭在电信公司没有支付调整收入总额(AGR)会费92000卢比。据报道,一些电信圈当局发出了通知付款周五午夜。红皇后著名早餐前相信六件不可能的事情。不能电信部门(点)相信只有一个,在晚上?可以列出什么是可能的,尽管:公务员能够保护自己的臀部,让电信公司支付不可能,沃达丰(Vodafone)想法可以折叠起来,除非Aditya Birla)芯片有19000卢比,现在沃达丰宣布它将不会把新鲜的钱到印度的手臂;没有其他运营商分享成本,附近的旅馆将其成本上升和提高关税,更容易,现在部门将变成一个双头垄断依赖Jio。也有可能,投资者会看到沃达丰想法的困境,真正的指数在印度做生意的缓解。

广告
我们是如何通过?当印度电信迁移从一个固定的,无法负担高,执照费,执照费收入的份额1999年,电信公司条件草案显示行业监管机构说印度电信管理部门(火车)将指定什么样的收入将被认为是可共享的。实际的许可证发布的时候,条件说总收入的份额。这在2003年进入争议。此后,NDA 1, UPA 1和2,和NDA 2追求让与人声称占总营收的,不管收入是来自电信牌照的行使。2019年10月,最高法院裁定,电信公司必须支付他们总收入的份额,因为这是他们签约。这个司法注重形式而不重实质让电信公司措手不及。他们寻求一个评论,解雇,他们请求时间支付,现在已经拒绝了。

生存竞争激烈的电信市场,采用5 g,印度未来的数字——都是悬而未决。只有勇敢的政府政策才能拯救印度电信。另一件不可能的事情吗?为了国家,我们应该希望不是这样。

  • 发布于2020年2月15日凌晨08:31坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

评论

现在评论 阅读评论(1)

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure> The Supreme Court has cracked the whip on telcos for not paying the adjusted gross revenue (AGR<\/a>) dues of 92,000 crore. Some telecom circle authorities reportedly issued notices for payment by midnight Friday. The Red Queen famously believed in six impossible things before breakfast. Can’t the department of telecom (DoT) believe in just one, late in the evening? What is possible can be listed, though: civil servants can protect their backsides by asking telcos to make impossible payments, Vodafone<\/a> Idea can fold up, unless Aditya Birla<\/a> chips in with some 19,000 crore, now that Vodafone has declared it would not put fresh money into the Indian arm; without a fellow operator to share costs with, Airtel<\/a> would see its costs go up and raise tariffs, all the more easily, now that the sector would turn into a duopoly with Reliance<\/a> Jio. It is also possible that investors would see Vodafone Idea’s plight as the real index of the ease of doing business in India.

How did we come to this pass? When Indian telecom migrated from a fixed, and unaffordably high, licence fee to licence fee as a share of revenue in 1999, telcos were shown a draft condition that said sector regulator Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (Trai) would specify what kinds of revenue would be deemed shareable. When the actual licence was issued, the condition said a share of gross revenue. This went into dispute in 2003. Since then, NDA 1, UPA 1 and 2, and NDA 2 have pursued the licenser’s claim to a share of aggregate revenue, regardless of whether the revenue was derived from exercise of the telecom licence or not. In October 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that telcos must pay a share of their gross revenue, as that is what they signed on to. This judicial fixation on form over substance took telcos by surprise. They sought a review, which was dismissed, they pleaded for time to pay up, which has now been turned down.

Survival of a competitive telecom market, adoption of 5G, the future of digital India — all are up in the air. Only brave government policy can save Indian telecom. Another impossible thing? For the nation’s sake, we should hope not.

<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":74144499,"title":"AGR issue: Telecom minister Ravi Shankar Prasad meets PM; DoT takes back order","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/agr-issue-telecom-minister-ravi-shankar-prasad-meets-pm-dot-takes-back-order\/74144499","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":74144506,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Telecom: A death judicially ordained - View","synopsis":"Only strong policy can salvage the mess","titleseo":"telecomnews\/telecom-a-death-judicially-ordained","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ETTelecom","artdate":"2020-02-15 08:31:22","lastupd":"2020-02-15 08:39:36","breadcrumbTags":["Airtel","Reliance","Aditya Birla","Telecom Regulatory Authority of India","Industry","AGR","Vodafone"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/telecom-a-death-judicially-ordained"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/telecom-a-death-judicially-ordained/74144506">