The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT<\/a>) wants the Department of Expenditure<\/a> (DoE) to withdraw a relaxation allowing domestic companies that have technology transfer arrangements with Chinese companies to bid for public projects, wary of a backdoor entry by entities from across the border.

This relates to a June 8 office memorandum issued by the DoE that said last year's order wouldn't apply to domestic bidders having transfer of technology (
ToT<\/a>) arrangements with entities from a country sharing a land border with India<\/a>. The government last year restricted companies based in nations sharing a land border with India from investing in the country and participating in public projects. The measures were aimed largely at Chinese companies.

The DPIIT, in a June 28 communication to the DoE, said it has received representations from stakeholders alleging that the June 8 clarification is against the basic purpose and intent of the earlier order issued last year in July.

\"Blanket exemption from registration to bidders having ToT arrangements will provide an indirect route to the bidders having beneficial ownership in land border sharing countries to participate in public procurement in violation of the guidelines stipulated in DoE order dated July 23, 2020,\" the DPIIT said.

\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>
Concerns of industry bodies<\/strong>
As per the communication reviewed by ET, industry chambers
CII<\/a>, Ficci and Assocham, the Telecom Equipment Manufacturers Association<\/a>, Cellular Mobile Association of India, the Science, Indigenous Technology and Advanced Research Accelerator, and Rail India Technical and Economic Service Limited have made representations raising concerns over the expenditure department's order.

\"It is requested to examine the various representations received on the subject and review the relaxation granted. Pending above, the aforesaid OM (office memorandum) may be put on hold,\" the industry department has suggested.

\"Their order goes against the objective of
Aatmanirbhar Bharat<\/a>. We have written to the finance ministry to withhold it,\" said an official aware of the development.

As per the DPIIT, the clarification means entities having beneficial ownership from the countries concerned can have ToT agreements for installation, maintenance, after sales service and similar such services with an Indian company to push Chinese products for public procurement. This is not permitted unless mandatorily registered, as per the DoE order of July 2020.

\"Therefore, the scope and mandate of ToT agreements proposed to be exempted from purview of DoE order... need to be defined,\" the DPIIT said, referring to national and data security concerns raised by industry, especially for projects in sensitive areas that need to be \"appropriately addressed.\"
<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":83974403,"title":"Devas seeks to seize Air India overseas assets to enforce Antrix arbitration award","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/devas-seeks-to-seize-air-india-overseas-assets-to-enforce-antrix-arbitration-award\/83974403","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"83973973","title":"Untitled design (55)","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"news\/economy\/policy\/dpiit-against-any-chinese-linked-companies-in-public-projects\/untitled-design-55","category_name":"DPIIT against any Chinese linked companies in public projects","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-72231\/83973973.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/economy\/policy\/dpiit-against-any-chinese-linked-companies-in-public-projects\/untitled-design-55\/83973973"}],"msid":83974420,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"DPIIT against any Chinese linked companies in public projects","synopsis":"The DPIIT, in a June 28 communication to the DoE, said it has received representations from stakeholders alleging that the June 8 clarification is against the basic purpose and intent of the earlier order issued last year in July.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/dpiit-against-any-chinese-linked-companies-in-public-projects","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Kirtika Suneja","author_link":"\/author\/479242995\/kirtika-suneja","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479242995.cms?width=100&height=100","author_additional":{"thumbsize":true,"msid":479242995,"author_name":"Kirtika Suneja","author_seo_name":"kirtika-suneja","designation":"Senior Assistant Editor","agency":false}}],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":126,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":630000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2021-06-30 08:05:14","lastupd":"2021-06-30 10:40:34","breadcrumbTags":["dpiit","cii","Aatmanirbhar Bharat","TOT","Department of Expenditure","India","policy","Telecom Equipment Manufacturers Association"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/dpiit-against-any-chinese-linked-companies-in-public-projects"}}" data-authors="[" kirtika suneja"]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2021-06-30" data-index="article_1">

DPIIT反对任何中国公司在公共项目有关

DPIIT,在6月28日沟通能源部表示,它已经收到股东称,6月8日澄清表示反对的基本目的和意图去年7月订单早些时候发布。

Kirtika Suneja
  • 更新在2021年6月30日晚10点坚持
阅读: 100年行业专业人士
读者的形象读到100年行业专业人士

促进产业和国内贸易部门(DPIIT)希望部门支出(DoE)撤回放宽允许国内公司与中国企业技术转让安排竞标公共项目,谨慎的后门进入来自边境的实体。

这涉及到一个办公室6月8日发布的备忘录能源部说,去年的订单不会适用于国内投标人的技术转让(合计与实体)安排从一个国家共享一个陆地边界印度。政府去年限制公司位于国家共享一个陆地边界与印度在中国投资和参与公共项目。这些措施是主要针对中国公司。

广告
DPIIT,在6月28日沟通能源部表示,它已经收到股东称,6月8日澄清表示反对的基本目的和意图去年7月订单早些时候发布。

“全面豁免注册买家合计安排将提供一个间接路线的竞标者实益拥有权在陆地边界共享国家参与公共采购违反规定的指导方针能源部订单日期为7月23日,2020年,“DPIIT说。


关注的行业组织
按照沟通审核等,行业商会人民共和国印度联合工商会印度工商联合会,,,电信设备制造商协会印度,蜂窝移动协会,科学,印度本土技术和高级研究加速器,和铁路技术和经济服务有限公司提出交涉提高担忧支出部门的秩序。

“这是要求检查的各种表征主题和评论收到放松。等待,上述OM(办公备忘录)可能被搁置,“行业部门建议。

“他们违背的目的Aatmanirbhar巴拉特。我们已经写信给财政部拒绝它,”一位官员说意识到发展。

按照DPIIT,澄清意味着实体实益拥有权有关国家可以有小孩协议的安装、维修、售后服务和与一家印度公司类似这样的服务,推动中国公共采购的产品。这是不允许的,除非强制注册,根据美国能源部2020年7月。

广告
“因此,合计的范围和授权协议提出免除能源部秩序的范围……需要定义,“DPIIT说,指的是国家和数据安全问题提出的行业,尤其是对项目”在一些敏感领域需要妥善解决。”

  • 发表在2021年6月30日08:05点坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序

The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT<\/a>) wants the Department of Expenditure<\/a> (DoE) to withdraw a relaxation allowing domestic companies that have technology transfer arrangements with Chinese companies to bid for public projects, wary of a backdoor entry by entities from across the border.

This relates to a June 8 office memorandum issued by the DoE that said last year's order wouldn't apply to domestic bidders having transfer of technology (
ToT<\/a>) arrangements with entities from a country sharing a land border with India<\/a>. The government last year restricted companies based in nations sharing a land border with India from investing in the country and participating in public projects. The measures were aimed largely at Chinese companies.

The DPIIT, in a June 28 communication to the DoE, said it has received representations from stakeholders alleging that the June 8 clarification is against the basic purpose and intent of the earlier order issued last year in July.

\"Blanket exemption from registration to bidders having ToT arrangements will provide an indirect route to the bidders having beneficial ownership in land border sharing countries to participate in public procurement in violation of the guidelines stipulated in DoE order dated July 23, 2020,\" the DPIIT said.

\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>
Concerns of industry bodies<\/strong>
As per the communication reviewed by ET, industry chambers
CII<\/a>, Ficci and Assocham, the Telecom Equipment Manufacturers Association<\/a>, Cellular Mobile Association of India, the Science, Indigenous Technology and Advanced Research Accelerator, and Rail India Technical and Economic Service Limited have made representations raising concerns over the expenditure department's order.

\"It is requested to examine the various representations received on the subject and review the relaxation granted. Pending above, the aforesaid OM (office memorandum) may be put on hold,\" the industry department has suggested.

\"Their order goes against the objective of
Aatmanirbhar Bharat<\/a>. We have written to the finance ministry to withhold it,\" said an official aware of the development.

As per the DPIIT, the clarification means entities having beneficial ownership from the countries concerned can have ToT agreements for installation, maintenance, after sales service and similar such services with an Indian company to push Chinese products for public procurement. This is not permitted unless mandatorily registered, as per the DoE order of July 2020.

\"Therefore, the scope and mandate of ToT agreements proposed to be exempted from purview of DoE order... need to be defined,\" the DPIIT said, referring to national and data security concerns raised by industry, especially for projects in sensitive areas that need to be \"appropriately addressed.\"
<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":83974403,"title":"Devas seeks to seize Air India overseas assets to enforce Antrix arbitration award","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/devas-seeks-to-seize-air-india-overseas-assets-to-enforce-antrix-arbitration-award\/83974403","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"83973973","title":"Untitled design (55)","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"news\/economy\/policy\/dpiit-against-any-chinese-linked-companies-in-public-projects\/untitled-design-55","category_name":"DPIIT against any Chinese linked companies in public projects","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-72231\/83973973.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/economy\/policy\/dpiit-against-any-chinese-linked-companies-in-public-projects\/untitled-design-55\/83973973"}],"msid":83974420,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"DPIIT against any Chinese linked companies in public projects","synopsis":"The DPIIT, in a June 28 communication to the DoE, said it has received representations from stakeholders alleging that the June 8 clarification is against the basic purpose and intent of the earlier order issued last year in July.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/dpiit-against-any-chinese-linked-companies-in-public-projects","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Kirtika Suneja","author_link":"\/author\/479242995\/kirtika-suneja","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479242995.cms?width=100&height=100","author_additional":{"thumbsize":true,"msid":479242995,"author_name":"Kirtika Suneja","author_seo_name":"kirtika-suneja","designation":"Senior Assistant Editor","agency":false}}],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":126,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":630000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2021-06-30 08:05:14","lastupd":"2021-06-30 10:40:34","breadcrumbTags":["dpiit","cii","Aatmanirbhar Bharat","TOT","Department of Expenditure","India","policy","Telecom Equipment Manufacturers Association"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/dpiit-against-any-chinese-linked-companies-in-public-projects"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/dpiit-against-any-chinese-linked-companies-in-public-projects/83974420">