![\"\"](\"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
“There are a lot of ambiguities in this Bill. There is no clear definition of phrases such as 'fair and reasonable processing', ‘sensitive and critical Data’, etc. Furthermore, functions of the State are widely worded, neglecting the test of necessity and proportionality,” a spokesperson from SFLC.in said.
SFLC conducted a series of roundtable discussions in Delhi, Bangalore, Mumbai and Kochi ahead of submitting comments to MeiTY<\/a> on the draf data protection<\/a> bill.
The round-table events featured three separate panel discussions focusing on data principal rights and data fiduciary obligations; data localization and exemptions; and administration and enforcement which were discussed in detail.
Among the key points that were discussed in the roundtable is the limitation on the rights of Internet users, particularly compared to European Union’s GDPR. The participants agreed that the concept of Right to be Forgotten has been inaccurately borrowed from the GDPR and does not include right to delete\/erase your personal data. Many startup founders in Bangalore and Mumbai expressed that the interest of small and medium enterprises has not been considered.
Many participants raised concerns that data localization would harm small businesses and startups with compliance burden and raised costs.
Prof. Rahul De, HP Chair Professor at IIM-Bangalore opined, “The Bill will heavily affect the BPO, AI and IoT industry as they thrive on huge amount of data, which is generally crowdsourced. Data Mirroring\/localization requirement will limit the possibilities of business and research. He further stated that there is need to specify what can stay within the country and what can be shared outside, along with specifications on the origin of Data.”
In Mumbai, Faisal Farooqui, the CEO of MouthShut.com added, “India requires significant investment in data center infrastructure, multiple Optic Fiber backbones and enhance power generation and grid capacity before we mandate data localization. Data storage, cloud computing and bandwidth costs in US are a fraction of the current costs in India so it does not make economic sense to mandate localization yet. It will be a tremendous deterrent to sustain and build a vibrant startup ecosystem- which is a must for huge job creation”.
Furthermore, Bishakha Dutta from Point of View, raised concerns with respect to provisions regarding the age to obtain a child’s consent. Citing an example she stated that many teenage girls try to protect their data from their parents, who strictly monitor their phone usage. In that light, Isn't it ironical then that parental consent will be needed to protect the data of children? Parents do not wish their daughters to be on certain social media platforms and discourage them to engage with the opposite sex. Therefore, if such a provision is strictly implemented, it will directly impact minors.
Additionally, it was pointed out that the Data Protection Authority of India (DPAI), the proposed body for enforcement and administration of the Bill is not completely independent considering the critical responsibilities bestowed upon it. Attendees were of the view that excessive governmental control exists via power to make appointments and remove members of the DPAI, power to determine salaries and allowances, and power to notify certain categories of personal data that can be processed only in India, among others.
In Kochi, Dr.. Athira.P.S, Asst.Professor at NUALS, highlighted the shortcomings of the Bill in the light of Puttaswamy and Aadhaar judgments. She opined that this Bill does not address the concerns regarding Profiling and Targeted advertising deployed by state and non state actors. She also highlighted how the Bill fails to stand the test of proportionality that has been upheld under the nine judge bench privacy judgment.
The panels across three cities unanimously recommended that there should be adequate sensitization, training and compliance certification for the people and businesses to be able to understand the implications of this Bill. It was agreed that the Data Protection Authority of India (DPAI) has been overburdened with roles and responsibilities. Many participants expressed that the draft law is heavily tilted towards the Central Government and not a balanced law considering all stakeholders interest.
This important discussion aimed at urging leaders and key stakeholders to put forth their views on the draft Personal Data Protection Bill and push the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to make appropriate amendments in the Bill. MeitY invited comments on the Bill from the public by September 10, 2018, which has now been extended to October 10, 2018. SFLC.in will submit a report to the Ministry consisting of all the important recommendations.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":66066736,"title":"Mukesh Ambani emerges richest Indian for 11th consecutive year: Forbes","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/mukesh-ambani-emerges-richest-indian-for-11th-consecutive-year-forbes\/66066736","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"66066744","title":"'India\u2019s data protection bill is poorly worded; does not serve any stakeholder\u2019s interests'","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"tech\/internet\/indias-data-protection-bill-is-poorly-worded-does-not-serve-any-stakeholders-interests","category_name":"'India\u2019s data protection bill is poorly worded; does not serve any stakeholder\u2019s interests'","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-160568\/66066744.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/tech\/internet\/indias-data-protection-bill-is-poorly-worded-does-not-serve-any-stakeholders-interests\/66066744"}],"msid":66067229,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"'India\u2019s data protection bill is poorly worded; does not serve any stakeholder\u2019s interests'","synopsis":"SFLC conducted a series of roundtable discussions in Delhi, Bangalore, Mumbai and Kochi ahead of submitting comments to MeiTY on the draf data protection bill.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/indias-data-protection-bill-is-poorly-worded-does-not-serve-any-stakeholders-interests","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Nilesh Christopher","author_link":"\/author\/479245454\/nilesh-christopher","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479245454.cms?width=100&height=100","author_additional":{"thumbsize":true,"msid":479245454,"author_name":"Nilesh Christopher","author_seo_name":"nilesh-christopher","designation":"Correspondent - Technology","agency":false}}],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2018-10-04 12:40:19","lastupd":"2018-10-04 12:43:10","breadcrumbTags":["Data Protection","data protection bill","SFLC.in","Hacking","MeitY","policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/indias-data-protection-bill-is-poorly-worded-does-not-serve-any-stakeholders-interests"}}" data-authors="[" nilesh christopher"]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2018-10-04" data-index="article_1">
- Telecom乐动扑克News
- 4分钟阅读
印度的数据保护法案措辞不当;不提供任何利益相关者的利益
被进行了一系列的圆桌会议讨论在德里,孟买和班加罗尔科钦提前提交评论MeiTY draf数据保护法案。
“有很多歧义在这个法案。没有明确定义的短语,如“公平合理处理”,敏感和关键数据,等。此外,函数的状态广泛措辞、忽视必要性和比例的考验,从被“发言人。在说。
被进行了一系列的圆桌会议讨论在德里,孟买和班加罗尔科钦提前提交评论MeiTY在draf数据保护比尔。
圆桌活动特色三个独立的小组讨论关注数据主要权利和受托义务;数据本地化和豁免;管理和执行详细讨论。
在圆桌会议中讨论的重点是限制网络用户的权利,尤其是欧盟GDPR相比。与会者一致认为,权利被遗忘已经不准确的概念借鉴GDPR和不包括删除/删除你的个人资料。很多创业者在班加罗尔和孟买表示,中小企业的利益没有被考虑。
许多参与者表示担心数据本地化将损害中小企业和创业公司合规负担和提高成本。
拉胡尔•德教授,惠普椅子班加罗尔分校教授认为,“该法案将严重影响业务流程外包,AI和物联网产业发展对大量的数据,这通常是众包。数据镜像/本地化需求将限制商业和研究的可能性。他进一步表示,需要指定什么可以留在这个国家,可以共享外,还有规范数据的起源。”
在孟买,费萨尔Farooqui, MouthShut.com的首席执行官说,“印度在数据中心基础设施需要大量投资,多个光纤骨干,提高发电和电网容量之前我们授权数据本地化。数据存储、云计算和带宽成本在我们当前的成本的一小部分在印度也没有经济意义,要求定位。这将是一个巨大的威慑来维持和建立一个充满活力的创业生态系统——这是一个必须为巨大的就业机会”。
此外,Bishakha Dutta从的角度来看,担心对规定年龄获得孩子的同意。引用一个例子她指出,许多十几岁的女孩从他们的父母试图保护他们的数据,严格监控他们的手机使用情况。光,是不是讽刺的,需要父母的同意来保护儿童的数据?父母不希望自己的女儿在某些社交媒体平台和阻止他们与异性接触。因此,如果这样的条款严格执行,它将直接影响未成年人。
此外,指出印度的数据保护机构(DPAI)拟议的执法和管理法案的身体不是完全独立考虑的关键职责赋予它。与会者认为,政府的过度控制存在通过预约和删除成员DPAI,能力决定薪水和津贴,和权力通知某些类别的个人数据,只能在印度,加工等等。
在高知县,博士. .Athira.P。年代,Asst.Professor NUALS,突出的缺点该法案的Puttaswamy Aadhaar的判断。她认为,这项法案不会解决问题关于分析和目标广告由州和非州部署演员。她还强调,这项法案没有经受住考验的比例维持在九个法官板凳隐私的判断。
板在三个城市一致推荐,应该有足够的敏感,培训和合规认证为人民和企业能够理解这一法案的影响。同意,印度的数据保护机构(DPAI)已经负担过重的角色和责任。许多参与者表示,该法律草案向中央政府严重倾斜,而不是一个平衡的法律考虑所有利益相关者的利益。
这个重要的讨论,旨在敦促领导人和关键利益相关者提出他们的意见的个人数据保护法案草案,推动中国电子和信息技术进行适当修正法案。MeitY邀请评论该法案从公众到9月10日,2018年,现在已经扩展到10月10日,2018年。SFLC.inwill submit a report to the Ministry consisting of all the important recommendations.
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动