Proposed changes in the draft Telecommunications Bill 2022 aims to level the field by bringing the regulation of communications services provided by over-the-top players on a par with those offered by cellular network operators. This is unexceptional. But if the regulation were to extend to broadcasting, it would create unnecessary extraneous oversight of an already regulated industry. Broadcasting has co-evolved with telecom. But it operates within a distinct set of rules that govern content and carriage. This distinction should not be blurred by licensing requirements for services provided through telecom networks. Converging technologies in TV, radio and digital media will<\/a> rely increasingly on spectrum. But the department of telecommunications (DoT) does not possess the institutional capacity to oversee the health of the industry that the I&B<\/a> and IT ministries and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (Trai) do.

Predicating the regulation of information that travels on telecom networks on the use of spectrum would be a perverse application of oversight based on input rather than output. Content regulation is in an entirely different silo from optimising use of radio frequencies. And they should remain apart. Any jurisdictional overlap could affect freedom of expression. The
ministry of broadcasting<\/a> has a light touch to content regulation that has over the years led to the development of a vibrant media and entertainment industry. Oversight of uplinking and downlinking, platform services and fees, and quality of service is provided by Trai. It would be in GoI<\/a>'s interest to allow an independent regulator to oversee carriage rules. Consumer protection is adequately addressed through legislation enforced by the IT ministry.

GoI is trying to contemporise telecom laws as part of a future-ready digital regulatory framework. Some bits of the regulatory architecture need to be shuffled around among the clutch of laws that are being drafted. The process, however, must be sensitive to overreach.

<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":95457738,"title":"Vodafone Idea ropes in key Airtel executive Divya Sethi leading OneWeb for AMEA","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/vodafone-idea-ropes-in-key-airtel-executive-divya-sethi-leading-oneweb-for-amea\/95457738","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"95460364","title":"broadcast","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"opinion\/et-editorial\/broadcasting-is-ibs-and-its-remit\/broadcast","category_name":"Broadcasting is I&B's and IT's remit","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-51930\/95460364.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/opinion\/et-editorial\/broadcasting-is-ibs-and-its-remit\/broadcast\/95460364"}],"msid":95462301,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"View: Broadcasting is I&B's and IT's remit","synopsis":"GoI is trying to contemporise telecom laws as part of a future-ready digital regulatory framework. Some bits of the regulatory architecture need to be shuffled around among the clutch of laws that are being drafted. The process, however, must be sensitive to overreach.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/view-broadcasting-is-ibs-and-its-remit","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2022-11-12 07:22:28","lastupd":"2022-11-12 07:23:15","breadcrumbTags":["ministry of broadcasting","telecom regulatory authority of india","goi","Will","i&b","Policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/view-broadcasting-is-ibs-and-its-remit"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2022-11-12" data-index="article_1">

观点:广播i b的职权范围

GoI试图contemporise电信法律作为future-ready数字监管框架的一部分。一些监管架构需要离合器中转来转去正在起草的法律。然而,这个过程中,必须对过度敏感。

  • 更新于2022年11月12日07:23点坚持

2022年电信法案草案修改建议旨在使监管领域的水平提供的通信服务顶级球员与蜂窝网络运营商提供的那些。这是普通的。但如果监管延伸到广播,就会产生不必要的外部监督已经监管的行业。广播和电信密切相关。但它运行在一个不同的组规则,这些规则控制内容和马车。这种区别不应被许可要求通过电信网络提供的服务。融合技术在电视、广播和数字媒体日益依赖光谱。但是电信部(点)不具备监督的机构能力的健康产业i b部门和印度电信管理部门(火车)。

广告
预测信息的规定在电信网络上传播频谱的使用将是一个反常的应用程序基于输入而不是输出的监督。从优化内容监管是一个完全不同的筒仓使用无线电频率。他们应该保持分开。任何管辖权重叠可能影响言论自由。的中国广播轻触式内容,多年来了一个充满活力的媒体和娱乐产业的发展。监督上行和下行,平台服务费用,服务质量是由火车。这将是在GoI允许感兴趣的一个独立的监管机构,负责监督运输规则。消费者保护立法是有效解决由IT部门执行。

GoI试图contemporise电信法律作为future-ready数字监管框架的一部分。一些监管架构需要离合器中转来转去正在起草的法律。然而,这个过程中,必须对过度敏感。

  • 发布于2022年11月12日凌晨07:22坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序

Proposed changes in the draft Telecommunications Bill 2022 aims to level the field by bringing the regulation of communications services provided by over-the-top players on a par with those offered by cellular network operators. This is unexceptional. But if the regulation were to extend to broadcasting, it would create unnecessary extraneous oversight of an already regulated industry. Broadcasting has co-evolved with telecom. But it operates within a distinct set of rules that govern content and carriage. This distinction should not be blurred by licensing requirements for services provided through telecom networks. Converging technologies in TV, radio and digital media will<\/a> rely increasingly on spectrum. But the department of telecommunications (DoT) does not possess the institutional capacity to oversee the health of the industry that the I&B<\/a> and IT ministries and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (Trai) do.

Predicating the regulation of information that travels on telecom networks on the use of spectrum would be a perverse application of oversight based on input rather than output. Content regulation is in an entirely different silo from optimising use of radio frequencies. And they should remain apart. Any jurisdictional overlap could affect freedom of expression. The
ministry of broadcasting<\/a> has a light touch to content regulation that has over the years led to the development of a vibrant media and entertainment industry. Oversight of uplinking and downlinking, platform services and fees, and quality of service is provided by Trai. It would be in GoI<\/a>'s interest to allow an independent regulator to oversee carriage rules. Consumer protection is adequately addressed through legislation enforced by the IT ministry.

GoI is trying to contemporise telecom laws as part of a future-ready digital regulatory framework. Some bits of the regulatory architecture need to be shuffled around among the clutch of laws that are being drafted. The process, however, must be sensitive to overreach.

<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":95457738,"title":"Vodafone Idea ropes in key Airtel executive Divya Sethi leading OneWeb for AMEA","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/vodafone-idea-ropes-in-key-airtel-executive-divya-sethi-leading-oneweb-for-amea\/95457738","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"95460364","title":"broadcast","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"opinion\/et-editorial\/broadcasting-is-ibs-and-its-remit\/broadcast","category_name":"Broadcasting is I&B's and IT's remit","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-51930\/95460364.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/opinion\/et-editorial\/broadcasting-is-ibs-and-its-remit\/broadcast\/95460364"}],"msid":95462301,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"View: Broadcasting is I&B's and IT's remit","synopsis":"GoI is trying to contemporise telecom laws as part of a future-ready digital regulatory framework. Some bits of the regulatory architecture need to be shuffled around among the clutch of laws that are being drafted. The process, however, must be sensitive to overreach.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/view-broadcasting-is-ibs-and-its-remit","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2022-11-12 07:22:28","lastupd":"2022-11-12 07:23:15","breadcrumbTags":["ministry of broadcasting","telecom regulatory authority of india","goi","Will","i&b","Policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/view-broadcasting-is-ibs-and-its-remit"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/view-broadcasting-is-ibs-and-its-remit/95462301">