The European Union<\/a> (EU) has moved closer to legislation that intends to regulate digital platforms on the principle that legality is the same in the real and virtual worlds. This makes eminent sense. EU legislators have agreed to the scope of the Digital Services Act (DSA) that is targeted at curbing a wide array of misuse from user profiling to fake news to illegal goods. Once the law is enacted, companies will have 15 months to become compliant with the new rules or face fines up to 6% of their global revenues. Bigger technology companies will have to comply sooner and pay fees for policing by the EU. Alongside the Digital Markets Act<\/a> (DMA), legislation intended to curb monopolistic behaviour by Big Tech<\/a>, the EU is pushing the jurisdictional envelope over large parts of the internet. Its General Data Protection Regulation<\/a> (GDPR) laws have set the template for privacy protection, including for Indian data privacy legislation.

But extending jurisdiction is one thing, policing another. Stiff fines are not easily imposed on giant technology companies that operate from less intrusive jurisdictions like the US. The argument that it makes sense for technology companies to follow the stricter rules globally runs up against business models that depend on practices proscribed by the EU. Unless rules are harmonised worldwide, online businesses face the prospect of market fragmentation. This goes against the basic idea of the internet. As such, three distinct approaches to jurisdiction in the US, the EU and
China<\/a> are in play with little signs of reconciliation over something as fundamental as privacy. With most of the innovation emerging from the US, the EU or, for that matter, China, will always be behind the curve in regulation.

To the extent that the EU is putting out a view of how the internet should interact with society, its legislative vigour is commendable. But much like its other contributions to the world - democracy and capitalism - the rule of law on the internet will remain a matter of interpretation.

<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":91061297,"title":"WhatsApp rolls out ability to add 32 participants to group calls","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/whatsapp-rolls-out-ability-to-add-32-participants-to-group-calls\/91061297","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"91056297","title":"1","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"opinion\/et-editorial\/eus-will-to-protect-data-now-the-way\/1","category_name":"EU's will to protect data, now the way","synopsis":"With most of the innovation emerging from the US, the EU or, for that matter, China, will always be behind the curve in regulation.","thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-36350\/91056297.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/opinion\/et-editorial\/eus-will-to-protect-data-now-the-way\/1\/91056297"}],"msid":91061322,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"VIew: EU's will to protect data, now the way","synopsis":"To the extent that the EU is putting out a view of how the internet should interact with society, its legislative vigour is commendable.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/view-eus-will-to-protect-data-now-the-way","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2022-04-25 07:37:39","lastupd":"2022-04-25 07:38:06","breadcrumbTags":["data protection","european union","big tech","general data protection regulation","china","digital markets act","Policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/view-eus-will-to-protect-data-now-the-way"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2022-04-25" data-index="article_1">

观点:欧盟将保护数据,现在

在某种程度上,欧盟推出的互联网应该如何与社会互动,其立法活力是值得称道的。

  • 更新于2022年4月25日07:38点坚持

欧盟(欧盟)已经接近立法,打算调节数字平台的合法性原则在现实和虚拟世界是一样的。这给人以良好的感觉。欧盟议员同意的范围数字服务法案(DSA)针对抑制一系列广泛的滥用非法货物从用户分析假新闻。乐动扑克一旦制定,公司将有15个月成为符合新规则,否则将面临罚款高达6%的全球收入。更大的科技公司将不得不遵守治安由欧盟和支付费用。与数字市场法案(DMA)、立法旨在抑制垄断行为大型科技股,欧盟正在推动司法信封在互联网的大部分地区。它的一般数据保护规定(GDPR)法律对隐私保护设置模板,包括印度数据隐私法律。

广告
但扩大管辖权是一回事,警察。严厉的罚款不容易对大型科技公司运作等低侵入性的司法管辖区的美国。的说法是有道理的科技公司遵循更严格的全球规则与商业模式依赖于实践由欧盟禁止。除非规则是全球统一的,网上企业面临市场的前景的碎片。这违背了互联网的基本思想。这样,三种不同的方法来管辖在美国,欧盟和中国在玩小和解的迹象在处理一些基础事务(如隐私。大多数创新走出美国,欧盟,对于这个问题,中国永远是曲线背后的监管。

在某种程度上,欧盟推出的互联网应该如何与社会互动,其立法活力是值得称道的。但就像其他贡献世界——民主和资本主义法治在互联网上仍将是一种解释。

  • 发布于2022年4月25日07:37点坚持
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序

The European Union<\/a> (EU) has moved closer to legislation that intends to regulate digital platforms on the principle that legality is the same in the real and virtual worlds. This makes eminent sense. EU legislators have agreed to the scope of the Digital Services Act (DSA) that is targeted at curbing a wide array of misuse from user profiling to fake news to illegal goods. Once the law is enacted, companies will have 15 months to become compliant with the new rules or face fines up to 6% of their global revenues. Bigger technology companies will have to comply sooner and pay fees for policing by the EU. Alongside the Digital Markets Act<\/a> (DMA), legislation intended to curb monopolistic behaviour by Big Tech<\/a>, the EU is pushing the jurisdictional envelope over large parts of the internet. Its General Data Protection Regulation<\/a> (GDPR) laws have set the template for privacy protection, including for Indian data privacy legislation.

But extending jurisdiction is one thing, policing another. Stiff fines are not easily imposed on giant technology companies that operate from less intrusive jurisdictions like the US. The argument that it makes sense for technology companies to follow the stricter rules globally runs up against business models that depend on practices proscribed by the EU. Unless rules are harmonised worldwide, online businesses face the prospect of market fragmentation. This goes against the basic idea of the internet. As such, three distinct approaches to jurisdiction in the US, the EU and
China<\/a> are in play with little signs of reconciliation over something as fundamental as privacy. With most of the innovation emerging from the US, the EU or, for that matter, China, will always be behind the curve in regulation.

To the extent that the EU is putting out a view of how the internet should interact with society, its legislative vigour is commendable. But much like its other contributions to the world - democracy and capitalism - the rule of law on the internet will remain a matter of interpretation.

<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":91061297,"title":"WhatsApp rolls out ability to add 32 participants to group calls","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/whatsapp-rolls-out-ability-to-add-32-participants-to-group-calls\/91061297","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"91056297","title":"1","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"opinion\/et-editorial\/eus-will-to-protect-data-now-the-way\/1","category_name":"EU's will to protect data, now the way","synopsis":"With most of the innovation emerging from the US, the EU or, for that matter, China, will always be behind the curve in regulation.","thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-36350\/91056297.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/opinion\/et-editorial\/eus-will-to-protect-data-now-the-way\/1\/91056297"}],"msid":91061322,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"VIew: EU's will to protect data, now the way","synopsis":"To the extent that the EU is putting out a view of how the internet should interact with society, its legislative vigour is commendable.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/view-eus-will-to-protect-data-now-the-way","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2022-04-25 07:37:39","lastupd":"2022-04-25 07:38:06","breadcrumbTags":["data protection","european union","big tech","general data protection regulation","china","digital markets act","Policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/view-eus-will-to-protect-data-now-the-way"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/view-eus-will-to-protect-data-now-the-way/91061322">