Thinking within GoI that it may be better to go back to the drawing board for a Bill to protect its citizens' data could be a way of cutting through the knots the current draft finds itself in. The Personal Data Protection Bill<\/a>, 2019, has gone through an elaborate and time-consuming procedure that culminated with recommendations of a joint parliamentary committee (JPC<\/a>). Yet, controversial clauses linger relating to government surveillance, regulation of media, transfer of data outside the country, and the powers of the proposed data protection authority. A fresh approach to the overdue legislation is also driven by the desire of not imposing an onerous compliance burden on India<\/a>'s ecosystem of technology startups. 印度是挣扎在基本问题隐私,即使其他司法管辖区有细粒度的数据保护机制。在这些数据更好的保护比印度计划做什么。法律,任何一个路线,必须解决的问题监管过度,缓解做生意的和贸易扭曲。 思维在GoI不如回到绘图板法案保护其公民的数据可能是一个切断节当前草案的方式发现自己。个人数据保护法案,2019年,经历了一个复杂和耗时的过程,最终的建议联合议会委员会(JPC)。有关政府监督,然而,争议条款持续监管媒体,国外数据传输,提出了数据保护的权力权威。逾期立法的新方法也由的愿望不是强加一个繁重的合规负担印度生态系统的科技创业公司。
This course of action would be expedient if GoI needs to extricate itself from a procedural impasse: the JPC<\/a>'s recommendations have, in some cases, intensified the controversy around the Bill. But if pre-existing concerns were to persist in the new draft, the enactment of the law would merely have been delayed. Another round of stakeholder consultations would keep legislation behind the curve of technology change. Data protection is a dynamic endeavour, and the sooner the legal foundations are laid the easier it will be to alter the superstructure as the digital landscape unfolds.
India<\/a> is struggling with fundamental issues about privacy, even as other jurisdictions have granular data protection regimes in place. In some of these, data is better protected now than what India is proposing to do. The law, whichever route it takes, must address issues of regulatory overreach, ease of doing business and trade distortion. The government is expecting technology to fuel the next phase of India's development. To this effect, privacy protection that does not inhibit the digital economy is key. It is up to the government to find the shortest course to achieve this balance. It has already lost five years after the Supreme Court<\/a> upheld privacy as a fundamental right and sought a legislative framework to protect it.
<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":89713643,"title":"Brookfield Digital Realty JV furthers data center development plan, acquires 10 acres in Chennai","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/brookfield-digital-realty-jv-buys-land-for-data-centre\/89713643","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"89708889","title":"Godspeed the DataProtection Bill","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"opinion\/et-editorial\/godspeed-the-data-protection-bill\/godspeed-the-dataprotection-bill","category_name":"Godspeed the Data Protection Bill","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-658814\/89708889.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/opinion\/et-editorial\/godspeed-the-data-protection-bill\/godspeed-the-dataprotection-bill\/89708889"}],"msid":89713645,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"View: Godspeed the Data Protection Bill","synopsis":"India is struggling with fundamental issues about privacy, even as other jurisdictions have granular data protection regimes in place. In some of these, data is better protected now than what India is proposing to do. The law, whichever route it takes, must address issues of regulatory overreach, ease of doing business and trade distortion. ","titleseo":"telecomnews\/view-godspeed-the-data-protection-bill","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2022-02-21 07:44:52","lastupd":"2022-02-21 07:46:27","breadcrumbTags":["Data Protection Bill","india","supreme court","personal data protection","JPC","Policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/view-godspeed-the-data-protection-bill"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2022-02-21" data-index="article_1">
观点:祝成功数据保护法案
印度挣扎在基本问题是隐私,甚至在其他司法管辖区有细粒度的数据保护机制。在这些数据更好的保护比印度计划做什么。法律,任何一个路线,必须解决的问题监管过度,缓解做生意的和贸易扭曲。政府预计印度技术推动下一阶段的发展。这种效果,隐私保护,不抑制数字经济是关键。由政府找到最短的课程来实现这种平衡。它已经失去了五年之后最高法院支持隐私作为一项基本权利和寻求立法框架来保护它。
Thinking within GoI that it may be better to go back to the drawing board for a Bill to protect its citizens' data could be a way of cutting through the knots the current draft finds itself in. The Personal Data Protection Bill<\/a>, 2019, has gone through an elaborate and time-consuming procedure that culminated with recommendations of a joint parliamentary committee (JPC<\/a>). Yet, controversial clauses linger relating to government surveillance, regulation of media, transfer of data outside the country, and the powers of the proposed data protection authority. A fresh approach to the overdue legislation is also driven by the desire of not imposing an onerous compliance burden on India<\/a>'s ecosystem of technology startups.
This course of action would be expedient if GoI needs to extricate itself from a procedural impasse: the JPC<\/a>'s recommendations have, in some cases, intensified the controversy around the Bill. But if pre-existing concerns were to persist in the new draft, the enactment of the law would merely have been delayed. Another round of stakeholder consultations would keep legislation behind the curve of technology change. Data protection is a dynamic endeavour, and the sooner the legal foundations are laid the easier it will be to alter the superstructure as the digital landscape unfolds.
India<\/a> is struggling with fundamental issues about privacy, even as other jurisdictions have granular data protection regimes in place. In some of these, data is better protected now than what India is proposing to do. The law, whichever route it takes, must address issues of regulatory overreach, ease of doing business and trade distortion. The government is expecting technology to fuel the next phase of India's development. To this effect, privacy protection that does not inhibit the digital economy is key. It is up to the government to find the shortest course to achieve this balance. It has already lost five years after the Supreme Court<\/a> upheld privacy as a fundamental right and sought a legislative framework to protect it.
<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":89713643,"title":"Brookfield Digital Realty JV furthers data center development plan, acquires 10 acres in Chennai","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/brookfield-digital-realty-jv-buys-land-for-data-centre\/89713643","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[{"msid":"89708889","title":"Godspeed the DataProtection Bill","entity_type":"IMAGES","seopath":"opinion\/et-editorial\/godspeed-the-data-protection-bill\/godspeed-the-dataprotection-bill","category_name":"Godspeed the Data Protection Bill","synopsis":false,"thumb":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/thumb\/img-size-658814\/89708889.cms?width=150&height=112","link":"\/image\/opinion\/et-editorial\/godspeed-the-data-protection-bill\/godspeed-the-dataprotection-bill\/89708889"}],"msid":89713645,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"View: Godspeed the Data Protection Bill","synopsis":"India is struggling with fundamental issues about privacy, even as other jurisdictions have granular data protection regimes in place. In some of these, data is better protected now than what India is proposing to do. The law, whichever route it takes, must address issues of regulatory overreach, ease of doing business and trade distortion. ","titleseo":"telecomnews\/view-godspeed-the-data-protection-bill","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2022-02-21 07:44:52","lastupd":"2022-02-21 07:46:27","breadcrumbTags":["Data Protection Bill","india","supreme court","personal data protection","JPC","Policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/view-godspeed-the-data-protection-bill"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/view-godspeed-the-data-protection-bill/89713645">
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动