\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>The reported move to have a sunset date for high import tariffs<\/a> on electronic products<\/a> like mobile phones and TVs makes perfect sense. Artificial value addition behind high tariff walls enriches a few while impoverishing the citizenry, with high costs, obsolescence and incapacity to compete globally.

Reportedly, high tariffs to boost domestic production would have a 4-5-year term limit. In tandem, what’s surely required are innovative industrial and technology policies for Indian producers to build core design and brand capabilities, so as to be globally competitive by duly reaping economies of scale and scope.

The production-linked incentive (
PLI<\/a>) plan envisages that over the next five years, the bulk of electronics production worth over Rs 10.5 lakh crore would be exported.

Hence the imperative to keep the tariff hikes strictly timebound, to build a local ecosystem for cutting-edge manufactures. The Phased Manufacturing Programme (PMP), started in 2016-17, did not quite achieve its goals.

Under the
PLI<\/a> scheme, Apple’s contract manufacturers and Samsung<\/a> have signed up, along with home-grown players like Micromax and Lava, to produce mobile phones worth at least Rs 9 lakh crore. Electrical and electronics imports<\/a> added up to nearly $50 billion in 2019-20.

Microchips<\/a> of various kinds form a very large component of India’s imports and could overtake oil as the single-largest item. While India need not reinvent the wheel and produce everything locally, it is imperative to have technological autonomy, and not be held hostage as Huawei<\/a> currently is, by US sanctions.

That calls for far greater ambition than is contained in PLI or PMP. India must build competitive advantage in high-end semiconductors and chip design.

We need coherent
policy<\/a> incentives for startups and academia-industry incubators for technology spillovers in microelectronic hardware and integrating artificial intelligence into it. Without dedicated backward integration in technology, Atmanirbhar would ring hollow. Tariffs are no substitute for policy<\/a>.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":78800166,"title":"America Movil's capital expenditure will be $6 bln, down from $8.5 bln foreseen","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/america-movils-capital-expenditure-will-be-6-bln-down-from-8-5-bln-foreseen\/78800166","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":78800224,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"View: Tariff shelter must be temporary","synopsis":"' Without dedicated backward integration in technology, Atmanirbhar would ring hollow. Tariffs are no substitute for policy.' ","titleseo":"telecomnews\/view-tariff-shelter-must-be-temporary","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":582,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":2906000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET CONTRIBUTORS","artdate":"2020-10-22 08:25:15","lastupd":"2020-10-22 08:25:15","breadcrumbTags":["PLI","Apple Inc.","huawei","Samsung","import tariffs","electronic products","Microchips","policy","Electronics imports"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/view-tariff-shelter-must-be-temporary"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2020-10-22" data-index="article_1">

观点:关税保护必须是暂时的

没有专门的向后整合技术,Atmanirbhar就成了空话。关税是不能代替政策。”

  • 发布于2020年10月22日08:25点坚持
阅读: 100年行业专业人士
读者的形象读到100年行业专业人士
报道移动日落日期为高进口关税电子产品像手机和电视很有道理。人工价值之外的高关税壁垒后面丰富几而枯竭的公民,与高成本、报废和全球竞争的能力。

据报道,高关税,以刺激国内生产4-5-year任期限制。在串联,肯定是需要创新的工业和技术政策对印度生产商建立核心设计和品牌功能,所以被适时收获全球竞争力的规模经济和范围。

广告
根据激励(照明灯具)计划设想,未来的五年里,大部分的电子产品生产出口价值超过十万的10.5卢比。

因此,必须保持税率严格规定时限,为尖端制造建立一个当地的生态系统。分阶段生产计划(PMP),开始在2016 - 17,没有完全实现其目标。

照明灯具计划,苹果公司的合同制造商和三星已经签署,连同本土球员像Micromax和熔岩,生产手机价值至少9十万的卢比。电气和电子产品进口加起来近500亿美元在2019 - 20。

微芯片各种形式的一个非常大的印度进口的组件,可以取代石油成为单项项目。而印度本地不需要重新发明轮子,产生一切,必须有技术的自主权,而不是作为人质华为目前,美国的制裁。

要求更比包含在PLI或者PMP更大的野心。印度必须在高端半导体和芯片设计建立竞争优势。

我们需要一致的政策鼓励创业和academia-industry孵化器在微电子集成硬件和人工智能技术的溢出效应。没有专门的向后整合技术,Atmanirbhar就成了空话。关税是不可替代的政策
  • 发布于2020年10月22日08:25点坚持

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论
\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>The reported move to have a sunset date for high import tariffs<\/a> on electronic products<\/a> like mobile phones and TVs makes perfect sense. Artificial value addition behind high tariff walls enriches a few while impoverishing the citizenry, with high costs, obsolescence and incapacity to compete globally.

Reportedly, high tariffs to boost domestic production would have a 4-5-year term limit. In tandem, what’s surely required are innovative industrial and technology policies for Indian producers to build core design and brand capabilities, so as to be globally competitive by duly reaping economies of scale and scope.

The production-linked incentive (
PLI<\/a>) plan envisages that over the next five years, the bulk of electronics production worth over Rs 10.5 lakh crore would be exported.

Hence the imperative to keep the tariff hikes strictly timebound, to build a local ecosystem for cutting-edge manufactures. The Phased Manufacturing Programme (PMP), started in 2016-17, did not quite achieve its goals.

Under the
PLI<\/a> scheme, Apple’s contract manufacturers and Samsung<\/a> have signed up, along with home-grown players like Micromax and Lava, to produce mobile phones worth at least Rs 9 lakh crore. Electrical and electronics imports<\/a> added up to nearly $50 billion in 2019-20.

Microchips<\/a> of various kinds form a very large component of India’s imports and could overtake oil as the single-largest item. While India need not reinvent the wheel and produce everything locally, it is imperative to have technological autonomy, and not be held hostage as Huawei<\/a> currently is, by US sanctions.

That calls for far greater ambition than is contained in PLI or PMP. India must build competitive advantage in high-end semiconductors and chip design.

We need coherent
policy<\/a> incentives for startups and academia-industry incubators for technology spillovers in microelectronic hardware and integrating artificial intelligence into it. Without dedicated backward integration in technology, Atmanirbhar would ring hollow. Tariffs are no substitute for policy<\/a>.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":78800166,"title":"America Movil's capital expenditure will be $6 bln, down from $8.5 bln foreseen","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/america-movils-capital-expenditure-will-be-6-bln-down-from-8-5-bln-foreseen\/78800166","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":78800224,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"View: Tariff shelter must be temporary","synopsis":"' Without dedicated backward integration in technology, Atmanirbhar would ring hollow. Tariffs are no substitute for policy.' ","titleseo":"telecomnews\/view-tariff-shelter-must-be-temporary","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":582,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":2906000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET CONTRIBUTORS","artdate":"2020-10-22 08:25:15","lastupd":"2020-10-22 08:25:15","breadcrumbTags":["PLI","Apple Inc.","huawei","Samsung","import tariffs","electronic products","Microchips","policy","Electronics imports"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/view-tariff-shelter-must-be-temporary"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/view-tariff-shelter-must-be-temporary/78800224">