In the pre-historic age when emails were still cutting-edge, Mark Zuckerberg<\/a> mocked early Facebook<\/a> users for trusting him with their information.
\n
\nHe reportedly told a friend on instant message in 2004, “Yea so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard, just ask. I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses.” Friend: “What? How’d you manage that one?”
\n
Zuckerberg: “People just submitted it. I don’t know why. They ‘trust me’. Dumb f***s!” Okay, that was sophomoric and a very 19-year-old-male take on things but 14 years later, Zuckerberg’s habits haven’t changed much. He is still willing to share your
data<\/a> because you didn’t bother to go through multiple links to deny him permission. But he will apologise for it, if it makes you feel better.
\n
Zuckerberg, all grown-up and prepped by an army of image-makers and lawyers, did just that in his two marathon appearances before the
US Congress<\/a>. He was not under oath but he was appropriately contrite, adequately apologetic and generously full of promises to do the right thing in the future. If his past is anything to go by, don’t expect him to suddenly go soft on mining or selling personal data<\/a>.
\n
\nIn 2003, after creating Facemash, a Harvard hot-or-not site, which asked viewers to rate women’s appearances, Zuckerberg said, “This is not how I meant for things to go and I apologise for any harm done as a result of my neglect.” In September 2006, after introducing News Feed, which exposed updates to friends in one central place, he said, “We really messed this one up. We did a bad job of explaining what the new features were and an even worse job of giving you control of them.”
\n
\nIn December 2007, after he launched Beacon, which aggregated information about users across the web and sent it to
Facebook<\/a> for their friends to see and allowed targeted advertising, he said, “We did a bad job with this release and I apologise for it. People need to be able to explicitly choose what they share.” A class action suit shut Beacon down.
\n
More apologies followed in 2009, 2010 and 2011 over privacy controls, in 2016 for fake news, in 2017 over Russian manipulation, and in 2018 for
Cambridge Analytica<\/a>’s giant leap into Facebook’s data of 87 million users. Every time, Zuckerberg promised to do better but the results are murky at best.
\n
\nNo surprise that his latest apology tour sparked more cynicism than sympathy among people. But the lawmakers were different, especially the senators many of whom were twice Zuckerberg’s age and seemed lost in the jungle of digital jargon. They didn’t seem up to the task of making some good, old-fashioned rules for Facebook and other tech companies swimming in data. These battle-hardened politicians repeatedly sought Zuckerberg’s permission to bring order to his sprawling empire, pleading for his cooperation in writing new regulations. It was hardly a confident beginning to curb Facebook’s lusty ways.
\n
\nThings went so well — from Zuckerberg’s point of view. Facebook’s share price was up 4.5% on the first day of his grilling. A report in Axios noted that Zuckerberg benefited from “redundant questioning that rarely included smart followups”. Rest was political theatre. Questioning on the second day by the House Commerce and Energy Committee was sharper, allowed fewer deflections as members demanded to know if Zuckerberg was willing to come back from the abyss.
\n
\nCongressman Bobby Rush compared Facebook’s habits to the methods of J Edgar Hoover, FBI’s founding director notorious for a covert surveillance programme designed to collect information on civil rights activists. “Your methodology is similar,” Rush said.
\n
\nZuckerberg promised to put limits on apps that collect data but the company has indicated in more ways than one it wants users to self-regulate. Facebook wants to shield itself from future fiascos by claiming it had given users the tools. Too bad if you continue to think of the website as an innocent platform for sharing vacation photos and diet regimens, not a voyeur of personal data.
\n
\nIn reality, as the hearings clarified, Facebook could collect your data even if you are not a user, it can and does track user activity even when the user has logged off, it tracks people across devices and it stores data. Facebook had actually approved the terms of service, which eventually led to the selling of data to
Cambridge Analytica<\/a>. It is pretty much a monopoly because it acquires or crushes competition. Plug-ins such as Facebook Pixel and Like buttons are bugs that trace user activity everywhere and always.
\n
\nBut lawmakers failed to press Zuckerberg on the concrete steps he planned to take to give users greater control. They also failed to push him on why he hadn’t done so already since privacy issues have dogged Facebook for years.
\n
\nAs Senator Dan Sullivan asked: “Do you think you are too powerful?” The answer would be yes but Zuckerberg appeared puzzled, he who oversees the world’s largest virtual public square of 2.2 billion people, he whose personal worth is still $67 billion and whose company is worth $477 billion despite the scandals. Since users are the original “dumb f***s,” the burden is on them to become more digitally literate, more data vigilant.
\n
\n(The writer is a Washington-based journalist)<\/em>
\n\n<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":63764637,"title":"100 BPOs catering to women, SC\/ST to come up in Bihar: Ravi Shankar Prasad","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/100-bpos-catering-to-women-sc\/st-to-come-up-in-bihar-ravi-shankar-prasad\/63764637","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":63767643,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Why Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg can't be expected to suddenly go soft on mining or selling users' data","synopsis":"Zuckerberg has sounded genuinely apologetic. But if his past is anything to go by, don\u2019t expect him to suddenly go soft on mining your personal info.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/why-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-cant-be-expected-to-suddenly-go-soft-on-mining-or-selling-users-data","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Seema Sirohi","author_link":"\/author\/479205150\/seema-sirohi","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479205150.cms?width=100&height=100&hostid=268","author_additional":{"thumbsize":true,"msid":479205150,"author_name":"Seema Sirohi","author_seo_name":"seema-sirohi","designation":"Journalist","agency":false}}],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2018-04-15 07:43:17","lastupd":"2018-04-15 07:43:43","breadcrumbTags":["mark zuckerberg","data","US Congress","cambridge analytica","facebook","Sunday ET","Internet"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/why-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-cant-be-expected-to-suddenly-go-soft-on-mining-or-selling-users-data"}}" data-authors="[" seema sirohi"]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2018-04-15" data-index="article_1">

Facebook首席执行官马克·扎克伯格为什么不能会突然走软对矿业或出售用户数据

扎克伯格已经发出真诚的歉意。但如果他过去的话,别指望他会突然走软在挖掘你的个人信息。

Seema Sirohi
  • 更新于2018年4月15日07:43点坚持

在史前时代,当电子邮件仍尖端,马克•扎克伯格嘲笑早期脸谱网用他们的信息用户信任他。

据说他在2004年告诉一个朋友即时消息,“是的,所以如果你需要任何信息在哈佛,就问我。我有超过4000封电子邮件,图片,地址。朋友:“什么?你怎么做到的?”

扎克伯格:“人们只是提交。我不知道为什么。“相信我”。愚蠢的f * * *年代!“好了,这是一知半解的,一个19岁男子承担事情但14年后,扎克伯格的习惯没有改变太多。他仍然愿意分享你数据因为你没有麻烦去拒绝允许他通过多个链接。但他会道歉,如果能让你感觉更好。

扎克伯格,所有成年人和预备的军队脚和律师,并在他的两个马拉松前露面美国国会。他不是宣誓而是适当痛悔,充分道歉和慷慨的承诺在未来做正确的事。如果他过去的话,别指望他会突然走软在矿业或出售的个人数据

2003年,在创建Facemash,哈佛热辣的网站,这让观众对女性的外表,扎克伯格说,“这不是我多东西去和我道歉结果做任何伤害我的忽视。“2006年9月,介绍新闻Feed后,暴露在一个中心位置更新的朋友,他说,“我乐动扑克们真的搞砸。我们做了一个不好解释的新特性是什么更糟糕的一个工作给你控制他们。”

2007年12月,在他推出了灯塔,聚合用户通过网络和发送信息脸谱网让他们的朋友看到,允许定向广告,他说,“我们做了一个与这个版本不好,我道歉。人们需要能够明确地选择分享。“集体诉讼关闭灯塔。

更多的道歉之后2009年,2010年和2011年在隐私控制,在2016年为假新闻,2017年在俄罗斯操纵,并于2018年乐动扑克剑桥—的巨大飞跃到Facebook的8700万用户的数据。每次,扎克伯格承诺做得更好,但结果是模糊的。

难怪他最近道歉之旅引发比同情人冷嘲热讽。但议员们是不同的,尤其是参议员他们中的许多人是扎克伯格的年龄的两倍,似乎迷失在丛林中数字术语。他们看起来没有的任务做一些好,老式的Facebook和其他科技公司在游泳规则数据。这些身经百战的政客们反复寻找扎克伯格的许可将为他的庞大帝国,恳求他合作编写新的规定。它几乎是一个自信的开始抑制Facebook的精力充沛的方式。

事情就这么好——从扎克伯格的观点。Facebook的股票价格上涨了4.5%的第一天他的烧烤。报道Axios扎克伯格指出,得益于“多余的质疑,很少包括智能跟踪”。其他政治舞台。询问第二天由众议院贸易和能源委员会尖锐,允许更少的变位成员要求知道扎克伯格是否愿意从深渊回来。

众议员鲍比·拉什Facebook的习惯方法相比胡佛,联邦调查局的创始董事臭名昭著的秘密监察计划旨在收集信息在民权活动家。“你的方法是相似的,”拉什说。

扎克伯格承诺限制应用程序收集数据,但该公司表示以不止一种方式,它希望用户自我调节。Facebook希望保护自己免受未来的惨败,声称它给用户的工具。太糟糕了如果你继续认为该网站是一个无辜的平台分享假期的照片和饮食养生,不是个人数据的一个偷窥狂。

事实上,随着听证会澄清,Facebook可以收集你的数据,即使你不是一个用户,它甚至可以并跟踪用户活动当用户已经注销,其追踪人们在设备和存储数据。Facebook已经批准的服务条款,这最终导致了销售的数据剑桥—。这几乎是一个垄断因为它获得或粉碎竞争。插件如Facebook像素和按钮一样到处都是虫子,跟踪用户活动。

但立法者未能按扎克伯格在他打算采取具体步骤来给用户更大的控制权。他们也没能把他他为什么没有这么做因为隐私问题已经困扰Facebook多年。

参议员丹·沙利文问道:“你以为你是太强大?“答案将是肯定的,但扎克伯格似乎感到困惑,他负责22亿人口的世界上最大的虚拟公共广场,他的个人价值仍然是670亿美元,他的公司价值4770亿美元,尽管丑闻。由于用户最初的“愚蠢的f * * * s,”在他们身上的负担变得更加数字化教育,更多的数据保持警惕。

(作者是华盛顿的记者)

  • 发布于2018年4月15日07:43点坚持

加入2 m +行业专业人士的社区

订阅我们的通讯最新见解与分析。乐动扑克

下载ETTelec乐动娱乐招聘om应用

  • 得到实时更新
  • 保存您最喜爱的文章
扫描下载应用程序
是第一个发表评论。
现在评论

In the pre-historic age when emails were still cutting-edge, Mark Zuckerberg<\/a> mocked early Facebook<\/a> users for trusting him with their information.
\n
\nHe reportedly told a friend on instant message in 2004, “Yea so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard, just ask. I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses.” Friend: “What? How’d you manage that one?”
\n
Zuckerberg: “People just submitted it. I don’t know why. They ‘trust me’. Dumb f***s!” Okay, that was sophomoric and a very 19-year-old-male take on things but 14 years later, Zuckerberg’s habits haven’t changed much. He is still willing to share your
data<\/a> because you didn’t bother to go through multiple links to deny him permission. But he will apologise for it, if it makes you feel better.
\n
Zuckerberg, all grown-up and prepped by an army of image-makers and lawyers, did just that in his two marathon appearances before the
US Congress<\/a>. He was not under oath but he was appropriately contrite, adequately apologetic and generously full of promises to do the right thing in the future. If his past is anything to go by, don’t expect him to suddenly go soft on mining or selling personal data<\/a>.
\n
\nIn 2003, after creating Facemash, a Harvard hot-or-not site, which asked viewers to rate women’s appearances, Zuckerberg said, “This is not how I meant for things to go and I apologise for any harm done as a result of my neglect.” In September 2006, after introducing News Feed, which exposed updates to friends in one central place, he said, “We really messed this one up. We did a bad job of explaining what the new features were and an even worse job of giving you control of them.”
\n
\nIn December 2007, after he launched Beacon, which aggregated information about users across the web and sent it to
Facebook<\/a> for their friends to see and allowed targeted advertising, he said, “We did a bad job with this release and I apologise for it. People need to be able to explicitly choose what they share.” A class action suit shut Beacon down.
\n
More apologies followed in 2009, 2010 and 2011 over privacy controls, in 2016 for fake news, in 2017 over Russian manipulation, and in 2018 for
Cambridge Analytica<\/a>’s giant leap into Facebook’s data of 87 million users. Every time, Zuckerberg promised to do better but the results are murky at best.
\n
\nNo surprise that his latest apology tour sparked more cynicism than sympathy among people. But the lawmakers were different, especially the senators many of whom were twice Zuckerberg’s age and seemed lost in the jungle of digital jargon. They didn’t seem up to the task of making some good, old-fashioned rules for Facebook and other tech companies swimming in data. These battle-hardened politicians repeatedly sought Zuckerberg’s permission to bring order to his sprawling empire, pleading for his cooperation in writing new regulations. It was hardly a confident beginning to curb Facebook’s lusty ways.
\n
\nThings went so well — from Zuckerberg’s point of view. Facebook’s share price was up 4.5% on the first day of his grilling. A report in Axios noted that Zuckerberg benefited from “redundant questioning that rarely included smart followups”. Rest was political theatre. Questioning on the second day by the House Commerce and Energy Committee was sharper, allowed fewer deflections as members demanded to know if Zuckerberg was willing to come back from the abyss.
\n
\nCongressman Bobby Rush compared Facebook’s habits to the methods of J Edgar Hoover, FBI’s founding director notorious for a covert surveillance programme designed to collect information on civil rights activists. “Your methodology is similar,” Rush said.
\n
\nZuckerberg promised to put limits on apps that collect data but the company has indicated in more ways than one it wants users to self-regulate. Facebook wants to shield itself from future fiascos by claiming it had given users the tools. Too bad if you continue to think of the website as an innocent platform for sharing vacation photos and diet regimens, not a voyeur of personal data.
\n
\nIn reality, as the hearings clarified, Facebook could collect your data even if you are not a user, it can and does track user activity even when the user has logged off, it tracks people across devices and it stores data. Facebook had actually approved the terms of service, which eventually led to the selling of data to
Cambridge Analytica<\/a>. It is pretty much a monopoly because it acquires or crushes competition. Plug-ins such as Facebook Pixel and Like buttons are bugs that trace user activity everywhere and always.
\n
\nBut lawmakers failed to press Zuckerberg on the concrete steps he planned to take to give users greater control. They also failed to push him on why he hadn’t done so already since privacy issues have dogged Facebook for years.
\n
\nAs Senator Dan Sullivan asked: “Do you think you are too powerful?” The answer would be yes but Zuckerberg appeared puzzled, he who oversees the world’s largest virtual public square of 2.2 billion people, he whose personal worth is still $67 billion and whose company is worth $477 billion despite the scandals. Since users are the original “dumb f***s,” the burden is on them to become more digitally literate, more data vigilant.
\n
\n(The writer is a Washington-based journalist)<\/em>
\n\n<\/p><\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":63764637,"title":"100 BPOs catering to women, SC\/ST to come up in Bihar: Ravi Shankar Prasad","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/100-bpos-catering-to-women-sc\/st-to-come-up-in-bihar-ravi-shankar-prasad\/63764637","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"msid":63767643,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Why Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg can't be expected to suddenly go soft on mining or selling users' data","synopsis":"Zuckerberg has sounded genuinely apologetic. But if his past is anything to go by, don\u2019t expect him to suddenly go soft on mining your personal info.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/why-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-cant-be-expected-to-suddenly-go-soft-on-mining-or-selling-users-data","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[{"author_name":"Seema Sirohi","author_link":"\/author\/479205150\/seema-sirohi","author_image":"https:\/\/etimg.etb2bimg.com\/authorthumb\/479205150.cms?width=100&height=100&hostid=268","author_additional":{"thumbsize":true,"msid":479205150,"author_name":"Seema Sirohi","author_seo_name":"seema-sirohi","designation":"Journalist","agency":false}}],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"ET Bureau","artdate":"2018-04-15 07:43:17","lastupd":"2018-04-15 07:43:43","breadcrumbTags":["mark zuckerberg","data","US Congress","cambridge analytica","facebook","Sunday ET","Internet"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/why-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-cant-be-expected-to-suddenly-go-soft-on-mining-or-selling-users-data"}}" data-news_link="//www.iser-br.com/news/why-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-cant-be-expected-to-suddenly-go-soft-on-mining-or-selling-users-data/63767643">