Tele-Talk来自我们受人尊敬的行业领袖小组的新鲜拍摄,深入分析和意见

短信诈骗:我们忽视了电信的品牌侵权吗?

“一个可能的解决方案是为每个品牌提供唯一的单一电话号码标识,运营商可以将其作为企业服务的一部分。类似于入站免费电话。对于每个授权代理商,该品牌都可以使用这个唯一的电话号码配置和屏蔽号码,这就相当于该品牌在电信世界的商标。”

费萨尔Kawoosa
费萨尔Kawoosa techARC创始人、首席分析师

However, this is not the only case where a brand\u2019s identity is infringed over telecom services. Perhaps, a bigger issue than these SMSs is receiving sales calls from agencies of brands. We all receive calls from banks, insurance companies, credit card providers, etc., offering us their services. The issue here is that we do not get calls directly from the companies, but their authorized agents. There is no way to verify if these calls are from authorized agents. We just have to believe them.

For us, the reason to believe is when they tell us the name of the bank, insurance company, credit card provider, etc., because all of them are very credible and reputed brands. Many times, we could be their customers also, incidentally. So our reason for engaging with these callers is only the brand which they name. The case is not only with the banking and insurance sector. It is now with every other service as there are sales agencies selling almost everything \u2013 property, holidays, education courses, etc.

The issue is further complicated as barring a few very reputed brands, one can get calls from any number. If the user has a third-party caller identification app like True caller, there would be some indication as to who is calling. But again, it does not verify the authenticity of the caller in being an authorized representative to represent a brand.

A user might feel that there is no harm in such calls as there is no financial loss, unless the conversation goes to the level of asking OTP, etc. Airtel recently launched, Airtel SafePay which adds an additional layer of authentication to curb this issue. But financial loss is not the only fear of falling to such calls.

Using the reputation of a brand, any caller can reach out randomly to users and start collecting data or even updating a stale database to make its use in advertising, marketing, ad-fraud, and other ulterior use cases. Simply, privacy and integrity of an individual can be harmed in the name of reputed brands. There could be no bigger brand infringement abuse than this. If something happens to a user immediately after this call, their user would perceive that the brand which called is leaking data, or something else of this sort.

While blockchain based solutions implemented by operators to trace fake SMS headers is an enablement towards making the system secure and trustworthy, we have still not been able to solve the challenges that surface from pesky calls. One possible solution is to have a unique single phone number identity for every brand, which operators can offer as part of their enterprise services. Something, similar to inbound toll-free numbers.

For every authorized agent, the brand can configure and mask the number with this unique phone number which becomes equivalent to a trademark of the brand in the telecom world. So, whenever, any user receives calls on behalf of any brand through its agencies who may be calling from any number-\u2013mobile or landline, the customer always sees one number which can also be marked verified in caller identification apps as the brands identity.

This way, we can achieve some respite as users and have confidence in taking conversations further. The brands will get added advantage of analysing the outreach efforts of their agents, and also develop quality checks in terms of how frequently they are reaching out to same users to the extent of annoying them.

This decade is the decade of paying attention to the quality of our digital ecosystem including telecom to drive experience for value creation. Only that will engage users meaningfully along with trust and assurance. As we the users dive further into the digital ocean, and face sharks, eels and urchins, it will be only a safety and protection suite that the value chain has to develop together for us to enjoy the spectacular corals of the digital technologies.","blog_img":"","posted_date":"2021-02-07 13:09:48","modified_date":"2021-02-07 13:10:15","featured":"0","status":"Y","seo_title":"SMS scam: Are we ignoring Brand Infringement over telecom?","seo_url":"sms-scam-are-we-ignoring-brand-infringement-over-telecom","url":"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/tele-talk\/sms-scam-are-we-ignoring-brand-infringement-over-telecom\/4786","url_seo":"sms-scam-are-we-ignoring-brand-infringement-over-telecom"}">
德里高等法院已指示TRAI遏制造假行为短信头,这成为了一种以非常流行的数字平台的名义欺骗人们的简单方法。用户觉得他们从所使用的应用程序中收到了这样的短信,通常带有优惠或促销信息。按照收到的信息的指示,他们最终会从这些应用程序甚至银行账户中赔钱。

然而,这并不是电信服务中品牌身份被侵犯的唯一案例。也许,比这些短信更大的问题是接到品牌代理公司的销售电话。我们都会接到来自银行、保险公司、信用卡公司等的电话,向我们提供服务。这里的问题是,我们不会直接接到这些公司的电话,而是接到他们的授权代理人的电话。没有办法验证这些电话是否来自授权代理人。我们只需要相信他们。

对我们来说,相信的理由是当他们告诉我们银行、保险公司、信用卡提供商等的名字时,因为所有这些都是非常可信和知名的品牌。很多时候,顺便说一句,我们也可能是他们的客户。因此,我们与这些来电者接触的原因只是他们所提到的品牌。这种情况不仅发生在银行业和保险业。现在所有其他服务都是如此,因为几乎所有服务都有销售机构销售——房产、度假、教育课程等等。

这个问题更加复杂,因为除了几个非常有名的品牌,你可以接到任何号码的电话。如果用户有一个第三方来电识别应用程序,如True caller,就会有一些关于谁在打电话的提示。但同样,它不能验证呼叫者作为代表品牌的授权代表的真实性。

用户可能会觉得这样的通话没有任何伤害,因为没有经济损失,除非对话达到要求OTP等级别。附近的旅馆最近发布了,Airtel SafePay这增加了一个额外的身份验证层来抑制这个问题。但经济损失并不是人们对这种呼吁的唯一担忧。

利用品牌的声誉,任何呼叫者都可以随机接触用户,开始收集数据,甚至更新过时的数据库,以便在广告、营销、广告欺诈和其他隐秘的用例中使用。简单地说,个人的隐私和诚信可能会以知名品牌的名义受到损害。没有比这更严重的品牌侵权行为了。如果用户在打完电话后马上发生了什么事,他们的用户就会认为拨打电话的品牌正在泄露数据,或者其他类似的事情。

区块链虽然运营商实施的追踪假短信标题的解决方案是使系统安全可靠的一种手段,但我们仍然无法解决烦人的呼叫所带来的挑战。一种可能的解决方案是为每个品牌提供唯一的单一电话号码标识,运营商可以将其作为企业服务的一部分提供。类似于入站免费电话。

对于每个授权的代理,品牌可以配置和掩码的号码与这个唯一的电话号码,成为相当于品牌的商标在电信世界。因此,无论何时,任何用户通过其代理机构接听代表任何品牌的电话,这些电话可能来自任何号码——移动电话或固定电话,客户总是看到一个号码,该号码也可以在来电显示应用程序中标记为品牌标识。

这样,作为用户,我们可以获得一些喘息机会,并有信心进一步开展对话。这些品牌将获得额外的优势,可以分析其代理商的外联工作,还可以根据他们接触同一用户的频率进行质量检查,以达到惹恼他们的程度。

这个十年是关注我们的数字生态系统质量的十年,包括电信,以推动体验和价值创造。只有这样,用户才会有意义地参与进来,并获得信任和保证。当我们这些用户进一步潜入数字海洋,面对鲨鱼、鳗鱼和海胆时,价值链必须共同开发一套安全和保护措施,才能让我们享受数字技术的壮观珊瑚。

免责声明:所表达的观点仅代表作者,ETTelecom.com并不一定订阅它。乐动体育1002乐动体育乐动娱乐招聘乐动娱乐招聘乐动体育1002乐动体育etelecom.com不对直接或间接对任何人/组织造成的任何损害负责。


However, this is not the only case where a brand\u2019s identity is infringed over telecom services. Perhaps, a bigger issue than these SMSs is receiving sales calls from agencies of brands. We all receive calls from banks, insurance companies, credit card providers, etc., offering us their services. The issue here is that we do not get calls directly from the companies, but their authorized agents. There is no way to verify if these calls are from authorized agents. We just have to believe them.

For us, the reason to believe is when they tell us the name of the bank, insurance company, credit card provider, etc., because all of them are very credible and reputed brands. Many times, we could be their customers also, incidentally. So our reason for engaging with these callers is only the brand which they name. The case is not only with the banking and insurance sector. It is now with every other service as there are sales agencies selling almost everything \u2013 property, holidays, education courses, etc.

The issue is further complicated as barring a few very reputed brands, one can get calls from any number. If the user has a third-party caller identification app like True caller, there would be some indication as to who is calling. But again, it does not verify the authenticity of the caller in being an authorized representative to represent a brand.

A user might feel that there is no harm in such calls as there is no financial loss, unless the conversation goes to the level of asking OTP, etc. Airtel recently launched, Airtel SafePay which adds an additional layer of authentication to curb this issue. But financial loss is not the only fear of falling to such calls.

Using the reputation of a brand, any caller can reach out randomly to users and start collecting data or even updating a stale database to make its use in advertising, marketing, ad-fraud, and other ulterior use cases. Simply, privacy and integrity of an individual can be harmed in the name of reputed brands. There could be no bigger brand infringement abuse than this. If something happens to a user immediately after this call, their user would perceive that the brand which called is leaking data, or something else of this sort.

While blockchain based solutions implemented by operators to trace fake SMS headers is an enablement towards making the system secure and trustworthy, we have still not been able to solve the challenges that surface from pesky calls. One possible solution is to have a unique single phone number identity for every brand, which operators can offer as part of their enterprise services. Something, similar to inbound toll-free numbers.

For every authorized agent, the brand can configure and mask the number with this unique phone number which becomes equivalent to a trademark of the brand in the telecom world. So, whenever, any user receives calls on behalf of any brand through its agencies who may be calling from any number-\u2013mobile or landline, the customer always sees one number which can also be marked verified in caller identification apps as the brands identity.

This way, we can achieve some respite as users and have confidence in taking conversations further. The brands will get added advantage of analysing the outreach efforts of their agents, and also develop quality checks in terms of how frequently they are reaching out to same users to the extent of annoying them.

This decade is the decade of paying attention to the quality of our digital ecosystem including telecom to drive experience for value creation. Only that will engage users meaningfully along with trust and assurance. As we the users dive further into the digital ocean, and face sharks, eels and urchins, it will be only a safety and protection suite that the value chain has to develop together for us to enjoy the spectacular corals of the digital technologies.","blog_img":"","posted_date":"2021-02-07 13:09:48","modified_date":"2021-02-07 13:10:15","featured":"0","status":"Y","seo_title":"SMS scam: Are we ignoring Brand Infringement over telecom?","seo_url":"sms-scam-are-we-ignoring-brand-infringement-over-telecom","url":"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/tele-talk\/sms-scam-are-we-ignoring-brand-infringement-over-telecom\/4786","url_seo":"sms-scam-are-we-ignoring-brand-infringement-over-telecom"},img_object:["","retail_files/author_1509706883_temp.jpg"],fromNewsletter:"",newsletterDate:"",ajaxParams:{action:"get_more_blogs"},pageTrackingKey:"Blog",author_list:"Faisal Kawoosa",complete_cat_name:"Blogs"});" data-jsinvoker_init="_override_history_url = "//www.iser-br.com/tele-talk/sms-scam-are-we-ignoring-brand-infringement-over-telecom/4786";">